K Bloecker1, W Wirth, D J Hunter, J Duryea, A Guermazi, C K Kwoh, H Resch, F Eckstein. 1. Institute of Anatomy and Musculoskeletal Research, Paracelsus Medical University, Strubergasse 21, 5020 Salzburg, Austria; Department of Traumatology and Sports Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020 Salzburg, Austria. Electronic address: katja.bloecker@pmu.ac.at.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Radiographic joint space width (JSW) is considered the reference standard for demonstrating structural therapeutic benefits in knee osteoarthritis. Our objective was to determine the proportion by which 3D (regional) meniscus and cartilage measures explain between-knee differences of JSW in the fixed flexion radiographs. METHODS: Segmentation of the medial meniscus and tibial and femoral cartilage was performed in double echo steady state (DESS) images. Quantitative measures of meniscus size and position, femorotibial cartilage thickness, and radiographic JSW (minimum, and fixed locations) were compared between both knees of 60 participants of the Osteoarthritis Initiative, with strictly unilateral medial joint space narrowing (JSN). Statistical analyses (between-knee, within-person comparison) were performed using regression analysis. RESULTS: A strong relationship with side-differences in minimum and a central fixed location JSW was observed for percent tibial plateau coverage by the meniscus (r = .59 and .47; p<.01) and central femoral cartilage thickness (r = .69 and .75; p<.01); other meniscus and cartilage measures displayed lower coefficients. The correlation of central femoral cartilage thickness with JSW (but not that of meniscus measures) was greater (r = .78 and .85; p<.01) when excluding knees with non-optimal alignment between the tibia and X-ray beam. CONCLUSION: 3D measures of meniscus and cartilage provide significant, independent information in explaining side-differences in radiographic JSW in fixed flexion radiographs. Tibial coverage by the meniscus and central femoral cartilage explained two thirds of the variability in minimum and fixed location JSW. JSW provides a better representation of (central) femorotibial cartilage thickness, when optimal positioning of the fixed flexion radiographs is achieved.
BACKGROUND: Radiographic joint space width (JSW) is considered the reference standard for demonstrating structural therapeutic benefits in knee osteoarthritis. Our objective was to determine the proportion by which 3D (regional) meniscus and cartilage measures explain between-knee differences of JSW in the fixed flexion radiographs. METHODS: Segmentation of the medial meniscus and tibial and femoral cartilage was performed in double echo steady state (DESS) images. Quantitative measures of meniscus size and position, femorotibial cartilage thickness, and radiographic JSW (minimum, and fixed locations) were compared between both knees of 60 participants of the Osteoarthritis Initiative, with strictly unilateral medial joint space narrowing (JSN). Statistical analyses (between-knee, within-person comparison) were performed using regression analysis. RESULTS: A strong relationship with side-differences in minimum and a central fixed location JSW was observed for percent tibial plateau coverage by the meniscus (r = .59 and .47; p<.01) and central femoral cartilage thickness (r = .69 and .75; p<.01); other meniscus and cartilage measures displayed lower coefficients. The correlation of central femoral cartilage thickness with JSW (but not that of meniscus measures) was greater (r = .78 and .85; p<.01) when excluding knees with non-optimal alignment between the tibia and X-ray beam. CONCLUSION: 3D measures of meniscus and cartilage provide significant, independent information in explaining side-differences in radiographic JSW in fixed flexion radiographs. Tibial coverage by the meniscus and central femoral cartilage explained two thirds of the variability in minimum and fixed location JSW. JSW provides a better representation of (central) femorotibial cartilage thickness, when optimal positioning of the fixed flexion radiographs is achieved.
Authors: M D Crema; M C Nevitt; A Guermazi; D T Felson; K Wang; J A Lynch; M D Marra; J Torner; C E Lewis; F W Roemer Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: F Eckstein; A Guermazi; G Gold; J Duryea; M-P Hellio Le Graverand; W Wirth; C G Miller Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: K Bloecker; W Wirth; A Guermazi; D J Hunter; H Resch; J Hochreiter; F Eckstein Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Ming Zhang; Jeffrey B Driban; Lori Lyn Price; Daniel Harper; Grace H Lo; Eric Miller; Robert J Ward; Timothy E McAlindon Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2014-08-06 Impact factor: 2.362