Literature DB >> 24119182

The effect of low-dose carvedilol, nebivolol, and metoprolol on central arterial pressure and its determinants: a randomized clinical trial.

Péter Studinger1, Ádám G Tabák, Chen-Huan Chen, Paolo Salvi, Taha E H Othmane, Péter Torzsa, Judit Kapocsi, Bertalan C Fekete, András Tislér.   

Abstract

In this prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial the effects of low-dose carvedilol, nebivolol, and metoprolol on central arterial pressure and augmentation index (AIx) and its heart rate-corrected value (AIx@75) were assessed. The authors randomized 75 hypertensive patients (18-70 years) to carvedilol 12.5/25 mg, metoprolol 50/100 mg, or nebivolol 2.5/5 mg daily and followed them up for 3 months. Central arterial pressure and AIx were measured with applanation tonometry at baseline and at the end of follow-up. Analyses were restricted to 60 completers. Central systolic pressure decreased equally in all 3 treatment arms. AIx remained unchanged, while AIx@75 decreased significantly by 5.4%±2.5% in the nebivolol group. According to general linear models, individual change in heart rate was a strong predictor of change in AIx in the carvedilol group (r(2) =0.23, P=.03) although no similar association was found in the nebivolol group (r(2) =0.09). The impact of β-blockers with vasodilator effects on pressure augmentation seems to be different with nebivolol having the largest potential of decreasing AIx@75. While AIx changes associated with carvedilol treatment are strongly driven by heart rate changes, those associated with nebivolol treatment seem to be the result of other mechanisms. ©2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24119182      PMCID: PMC8034073          DOI: 10.1111/jch.12210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  25 in total

1.  Quantification of wave reflection in the human aorta from pressure alone: a proof of principle.

Authors:  Berend E Westerhof; Ilja Guelen; Nico Westerhof; John M Karemaker; Alberto Avolio
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Differential impact of blood pressure-lowering drugs on central aortic pressure and clinical outcomes: principal results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) study.

Authors:  Bryan Williams; Peter S Lacy; Simon M Thom; Kennedy Cruickshank; Alice Stanton; David Collier; Alun D Hughes; H Thurston; Michael O'Rourke
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-02-13       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Underestimation of vasodilator effects of nitroglycerin by upper limb blood pressure.

Authors:  K Takazawa; N Tanaka; K Takeda; F Kurosu; C Ibukiyama
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  The dose dependency of the alpha- and beta-adrenoceptor antagonist activity of carvedilol in man.

Authors:  T C Tham; S Guy; B J McDermott; R G Shanks; J G Riddell
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Aortic input impedance in normal man: relationship to pressure wave forms.

Authors:  J P Murgo; N Westerhof; J P Giolma; S A Altobelli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Differential effects of nebivolol and metoprolol on central aortic pressure and left ventricular wall thickness.

Authors:  Priit Kampus; Martin Serg; Jaak Kals; Maksim Zagura; Piibe Muda; Külliki Karu; Mihkel Zilmer; Jaan Eha
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  Effect of carvedilol on coronary flow reserve in patients with hypertensive left-ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  Huang Xiaozhen; Zhang Yun; Zhang Mei; Sun Yu
Journal:  Blood Press       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.835

8.  Effect of different antihypertensive drug classes on central aortic pressure.

Authors:  Trefor Morgan; Jann Lauri; Denise Bertram; Adrianne Anderson
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.689

9.  Mechanism(s) of selective systolic blood pressure reduction after a low-dose combination of perindopril/indapamide in hypertensive subjects: comparison with atenolol.

Authors:  Gérard M London; Roland G Asmar; Michaël F O'Rourke; Michel E Safar
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  A comparison of atenolol and nebivolol in isolated systolic hypertension.

Authors:  Zahid Dhakam; Carmel M McEniery; Tim Burton; Morris J Brown; Ian B Wilkinson
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.844

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Impact of Antihypertensive Agents on Central Systolic Blood Pressure and Augmentation Index: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tracey J McGaughey; Emily A Fletcher; Sachin A Shah
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.689

2.  Effect of Amlodipine/Valsartan Versus Nebivolol/Valsartan Fixed Dose Combinations on Peripheral and Central Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Selvia M Farag; Hoda M Rabea; Hesham B Mahmoud
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2018-11-03

3.  Hypertension treatment in the Asia-Pacific: the role of and treatment strategies with nebivolol.

Authors:  Cheol-Ho Kim; Nelson Abelardo; Peera Buranakitjaroen; Rungroj Krittayaphong; Chin Hock Lim; Sung-Ha Park; Nguyen Vinh Pham; Gregorio Rogelio; Bernard Wong; Lip Ping Low
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2016-02-24

4.  Ivabradine therapy to unmask heart rate-independent effects of β-blockers on pulse wave reflections.

Authors:  Ulrich Fischer-Rasokat; Jörg Honold; Denise Lochmann; Christoph Liebetrau; Jürgen Leick; Christian Hamm; Stephan Fichtlscherer; Helge Möllmann; Ioakim Spyridopoulos
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Are all β-blockers the same? Nebivolol vasodilator properties and evidence for relevance in treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  Mehmet Kanbay; Baris Afsar
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 6.  Rationale for nebivolol/valsartan combination for hypertension: review of preclinical and clinical data.

Authors:  Thomas D Giles; John R Cockcroft; Bertram Pitt; Abhijeet Jakate; Harold M Wright
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.844

7.  Risk of Hospitalization for Cardiovascular Events with β-Blockers in Hypertensive Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jan Basile; Brent Egan; Henry Punzi; Sanjida Ali; Qian Li; Mehul Patel; Joel Neutel
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2018-09-06

8.  Effect of Amlodipine/Nebivolol combination therapy on central BP and PWV compared to Amlodipine/Valsartan combination therapy.

Authors:  El-Zahraa M Sultan; Hoda Rabea; Ahmed A Elberry; Hesham B Mahmoud
Journal:  Egypt Heart J       Date:  2022-03-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.