T Speerschneider1, M B Thomsen. 1. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Danish National Research Foundation Centre for Cardiac Arrhythmia, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
AIM: The murine electrocardiogram (ECG) is a valuable tool in cardiac research, although the definition of the T wave has been a matter of debate for several years potentially leading to incomparable data. By this study, we seek to make a clear definition of the murine T wave. Moreover, we investigate the consequences of performing QT interval correction in anaesthetized mice. METHODS: Electrocardiograms from conscious mice were recorded by implanted telemetry devices. Surface ECGs were recorded from anaesthetized mice before and during pharmacological interventions, ventricular ischaemia and heart failure. Right atrial pacing was performed to evaluate the relationship between heart rate and QT intervals. RESULTS: Electrocardiogram traces of conscious and anaesthetized mice (lead II) showed separable positive J waves and negative T waves. The end of the T wave was determined as the point where the T wave returned to the isoelectric line. Atrial pacing revealed that the duration of the QT interval is independent of heart rate in anaesthetized mice. The calcium channel blocker, verapamil, prolonged the PR interval; however, the polarities of the J and T waves were not changed. Local cardiac ischaemia and β-adrenergic stimulation caused indistinguishable positive J and T waves. In contrast, chronic heart failure caused entirely negative J and T waves. In every case, the end of the T wave was clearly distinguishable on the ECG. CONCLUSION: The end of the T wave is readily available from conscious and anaesthetized mice. Heart rate correction of QT interval duration in the anaesthetized mouse is not recommended.
AIM: The murine electrocardiogram (ECG) is a valuable tool in cardiac research, although the definition of the T wave has been a matter of debate for several years potentially leading to incomparable data. By this study, we seek to make a clear definition of the murine T wave. Moreover, we investigate the consequences of performing QT interval correction in anaesthetized mice. METHODS: Electrocardiograms from conscious mice were recorded by implanted telemetry devices. Surface ECGs were recorded from anaesthetized mice before and during pharmacological interventions, ventricular ischaemia and heart failure. Right atrial pacing was performed to evaluate the relationship between heart rate and QT intervals. RESULTS: Electrocardiogram traces of conscious and anaesthetized mice (lead II) showed separable positive J waves and negative T waves. The end of the T wave was determined as the point where the T wave returned to the isoelectric line. Atrial pacing revealed that the duration of the QT interval is independent of heart rate in anaesthetized mice. The calcium channel blocker, verapamil, prolonged the PR interval; however, the polarities of the J and T waves were not changed. Local cardiac ischaemia and β-adrenergic stimulation caused indistinguishable positive J and T waves. In contrast, chronic heart failure caused entirely negative J and T waves. In every case, the end of the T wave was clearly distinguishable on the ECG. CONCLUSION: The end of the T wave is readily available from conscious and anaesthetized mice. Heart rate correction of QT interval duration in the anaesthetized mouse is not recommended.
Authors: Rocco Hueneke; Adam Adenwala; Rebecca L Mellor; Jonathan G Seidman; Christine E Seidman; Jeanne M Nerbonne Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Jared Tur; Kalyan C Chapalamadugu; Christopher Katnik; Javier Cuevas; Aruni Bhatnagar; Srinivas M Tipparaju Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2016-12-16 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Xiaowei Zhong; Bo Sun; Alexander Vallmitjana; Tao Mi; Wenting Guo; Mingke Ni; Ruiwu Wang; Ang Guo; Henry J Duff; Anne M Gillis; Long-Sheng Song; Leif Hove-Madsen; Raul Benitez; S R Wayne Chen Journal: Biochem J Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 3.857
Authors: Tslil Ast; Joshua D Meisel; Shachin Patra; Hong Wang; Robert M H Grange; Sharon H Kim; Sarah E Calvo; Lauren L Orefice; Fumiaki Nagashima; Fumito Ichinose; Warren M Zapol; Gary Ruvkun; David P Barondeau; Vamsi K Mootha Journal: Cell Date: 2019-04-25 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Louise Reilly; Francisco J Alvarado; Di Lang; Sara Abozeid; Hannah Van Ert; Cordell Spellman; Jarrett Warden; Jonathan C Makielski; Alexey V Glukhov; Lee L Eckhardt Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2020-08-04
Authors: Elizabeth A Schroder; Jennifer L Wayland; Kaitlyn M Samuels; Syed F Shah; Don E Burgess; Tanya Seward; Claude S Elayi; Karyn A Esser; Brian P Delisle Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2021-06-24 Impact factor: 4.566