Literature DB >> 24119005

A behavioral comparison of the common laboratory rat strains Lister Hooded, Lewis, Fischer 344 and Wistar in an automated homecage system.

L E Clemens1, E K H Jansson, E Portal, O Riess, H P Nguyen.   

Abstract

Behavioral characterization is an important part of establishing novel animal models, but classical behavioral tests struggle to reveal conclusive results due to problems with both reproducibility and validity. On the contrary, automated homecage observations are believed to produce robust outcomes that relate more to natural animal behavior. However, information on the behavior of background strains from such observations, which could provide important reference material, is rare. For this reason, we compared the behavior of the commonly used Lister Hooded, Lewis, Fischer 344 and Wistar rats during 70 h of exposure to an automated homecage system at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. We found considerable strain differences in metabolic parameters, novelty-induced and baseline activity-related behavior as well as differences in the development of these parameters with age. The results are discussed in terms of advantages and disadvantages of the system compared to classical behavioral tests, as well as the system's ability to recreate common findings in literature.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and International Behavioural and Neural Genetics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activity; PhenoMaster; animal welfare; automated homecage system; exploratory behavior; fischer 344; lewis; lister hooded; metabolism; rat strains; social isolation; standardization; strain differences; wistar

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24119005     DOI: 10.1111/gbb.12093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Brain Behav        ISSN: 1601-183X            Impact factor:   3.449


  5 in total

1.  Reduced motivation in the BACHD rat model of Huntington disease is dependent on the choice of food deprivation strategy.

Authors:  Erik Karl Håkan Jansson; Laura Emily Clemens; Olaf Riess; Huu Phuc Nguyen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Rodent models in neuroscience research: is it a rat race?

Authors:  Bart Ellenbroek; Jiun Youn
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 5.758

3.  Automated recording of home cage activity and temperature of individual rats housed in social groups: The Rodent Big Brother project.

Authors:  William S Redfern; Karen Tse; Claire Grant; Amy Keerie; David J Simpson; John C Pedersen; Victoria Rimmer; Lauren Leslie; Stephanie K Klein; Natasha A Karp; Rowland Sillito; Agis Chartsias; Tim Lukins; James Heward; Catherine Vickers; Kathryn Chapman; J Douglas Armstrong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Postmeal Optogenetic Inhibition of Dorsal or Ventral Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons Increases Future Intake.

Authors:  Reilly Hannapel; Janavi Ramesh; Amy Ross; Ryan T LaLumiere; Aaron G Roseberry; Marise B Parent
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-01-28

5.  The Norway rat, from an obnoxious pest to a laboratory pet.

Authors:  Klaudia Modlinska; Wojciech Pisula
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 8.140

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.