Literature DB >> 2411894

Comparative study of porous hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate as bone substitute.

K Shimazaki, V Mooney.   

Abstract

This study was performed to quantitate the bone ingrowth and biodegradability of porous calcium phosphate. Two kinds of coralline hydroxyapatite (CHA), along with sintered tricalcium phosphate (TCP), were evaluated. All implants had totally interconnecting pores. These pores measured 260-600 mu for CHA-Goniopora (CHAG), 190-230 microns for CHA-Porites (CHAP), and 100-300 microns for TCP. Cylindrical implants (3 mm in diameter by 8 mm in length) were implanted into the diaphyses of rabbit tibias for 3 to 24 weeks. The quantity of regenerated bone, remaining implant, nonmineralized space, and the middle two quarters of the cortical area were measured by a computerized operator-assisted analysis for bone histomorphometry. At 3 weeks after implantation, 17.3% of CHAG, 11.3% of CHAP, and 7.0% of TCP were infiltrated by regenerated bone. At 24 weeks, 56.1% of CHAG, 52.7% of CHAP, and 44.7% of TCP were occupied by lamellar-type bone. Implant degradation was noted to be 46.4% for TCP and 27.5% for CHAP. In contrast, CHAG did not show appreciable degradation until 24 weeks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2411894     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100030306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  20 in total

1.  Biphasic synthetic bone substitute use in orthopaedic and trauma surgery: clinical, radiological and histological results.

Authors:  C Schwartz; P Liss; B Jacquemaire; P Lecestre; P Frayssinet
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Biocompatible porous ceramics for the cultivation of hematopoietic cells.

Authors:  Almuth Berthold; Astrid Haibel; Natascha Brandes; Lothar Kroh; Ulrich Gross; Lutz Uharek; Helmut Schubert
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  In vivo performance of bilayer hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration in the rabbit radius.

Authors:  Teja Guda; John A Walker; Beth E Pollot; Mark R Appleford; Sunho Oh; Joo L Ong; Joseph C Wenke
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Bone ingrowth in zirconia and hydroxyapatite scaffolds with identical macroporosity.

Authors:  Johan Malmström; Erik Adolfsson; Lena Emanuelsson; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Microvascular response to calcium phosphate bone substitutes: an intravital microscopy analysis.

Authors:  Bernd Roetman; Andrej Ring; Stefan Langer; Thomas A Schildhauer; Gert Muhr; Manfred Köller
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Physicochemical properties and cytotoxicities of Sr-containing biphasic calcium phosphate bone scaffolds.

Authors:  Guo Dagang; Xu Kewei; Liu Yaxiong
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Hydroxyapatite-glass composite as a bone substitute in large metaphyseal cavities in rabbits.

Authors:  E A Suominen; A J Aho; J Juhanoja; A Yli-Urpo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Role of interconnections in porous bioceramics on bone recolonization in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  J X Lu; B Flautre; K Anselme; P Hardouin; A Gallur; M Descamps; B Thierry
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Calcium phosphate ceramics as bone graft substitutes in filling bone tumor defects.

Authors:  K C Saikia; T D Bhattacharya; S K Bhuyan; D J Talukdar; S P Saikia; P Jitesh
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Efficacy of nano-hydroxyapatite prepared by an aqueous solution combustion technique in healing bone defects of goat.

Authors:  Samit Kumar Nandi; Biswanath Kundu; Samir Kumar Ghosh; Dipak Kumar De; Debabrata Basu
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.672

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.