AIMS: To determine the association of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components with diabetes risk in participants with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and whether intervention-related changes in MetS lead to differences in diabetes incidence. METHODS: We used the National Cholesterol Education Program/Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP/ATP III) revised MetS definition at baseline and intervention-related changes of its components to predict incident diabetes using Cox models in 3234 Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) participants with IGT over an average follow-up of 3.2 years. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, the demographic-adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for diabetes in those with MetS (vs. no MetS) at baseline were 1.7 (1.3-2.3), 1.7 (1.2-2.3) and 2.0 (1.3-3.0) for placebo, metformin and lifestyle groups, respectively. Higher levels of fasting plasma glucose and triglycerides at baseline were independently associated with increased risk of diabetes. Greater waist circumference (WC) was associated with higher risk in placebo and lifestyle groups, but not in the metformin group. In a multivariate model, favourable changes in WC (placebo and lifestyle) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (placebo and metformin) contributed to reduced diabetes risk. CONCLUSIONS: MetS and some of its components are associated with increased diabetes incidence in persons with IGT in a manner that differed according to DPP intervention. After hyperglycaemia, the most predictive factors for diabetes were baseline hypertriglyceridaemia and both baseline and lifestyle-associated changes in WC. Targeting these cardiometabolic risk factors may help to assess the benefits of interventions that reduce diabetes incidence. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To determine the association of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components with diabetes risk in participants with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and whether intervention-related changes in MetS lead to differences in diabetes incidence. METHODS: We used the National Cholesterol Education Program/Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP/ATP III) revised MetS definition at baseline and intervention-related changes of its components to predict incident diabetes using Cox models in 3234 Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) participants with IGT over an average follow-up of 3.2 years. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, the demographic-adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for diabetes in those with MetS (vs. no MetS) at baseline were 1.7 (1.3-2.3), 1.7 (1.2-2.3) and 2.0 (1.3-3.0) for placebo, metformin and lifestyle groups, respectively. Higher levels of fasting plasma glucose and triglycerides at baseline were independently associated with increased risk of diabetes. Greater waist circumference (WC) was associated with higher risk in placebo and lifestyle groups, but not in the metformin group. In a multivariate model, favourable changes in WC (placebo and lifestyle) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (placebo and metformin) contributed to reduced diabetes risk. CONCLUSIONS: MetS and some of its components are associated with increased diabetes incidence in persons with IGT in a manner that differed according to DPP intervention. After hyperglycaemia, the most predictive factors for diabetes were baseline hypertriglyceridaemia and both baseline and lifestyle-associated changes in WC. Targeting these cardiometabolic risk factors may help to assess the benefits of interventions that reduce diabetes incidence. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Authors: Ronald M A Henry; Piet J Kostense; Annemieke M W Spijkerman; Jacqueline M Dekker; Giel Nijpels; Robert J Heine; Otto Kamp; Nico Westerhof; Lex M Bouter; Coen D A Stehouwer Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-04-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: A J Dunkley; K Charles; L J Gray; J Camosso-Stefinovic; M J Davies; K Khunti Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2012-02-21 Impact factor: 6.577
Authors: M Kaye Kramer; Donald M Molenaar; Vincent C Arena; Elizabeth M Venditti; Rebecca J Meehan; Rachel G Miller; Karl K Vanderwood; Yvonne Eaglehouse; Andrea M Kriska Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Mary A Hoskin; George A Bray; Kathy Hattaway; Prajakta A Khare-Ranade; Jeremy Pomeroy; Linda N Semler; Valarie A Weinzierl; Judith Wylie-Rosett Journal: Curr Nutr Rep Date: 2014-12-01
Authors: Silvia Carlos; Jokin de Irala; Matt Hanley; Miguel Ángel Martínez-González Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2014-06-24 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Li-Xin Tao; Kun Yang; Fang-Fang Huang; Xiang-Tong Liu; Xia Li; Yan-Xia Luo; Li-Juan Wu; Xiu-Hua Guo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-10-10 Impact factor: 3.390