Literature DB >> 24118717

Selective memories: infants' encoding is enhanced in selection via suppression.

Julie Markant1, Dima Amso.   

Abstract

The present study examined the hypothesis that inhibitory visual selection mechanisms play a vital role in memory by limiting distractor interference during item encoding. In Experiment 1a we used a modified spatial cueing task in which 9-month-old infants encoded multiple category exemplars in the contexts of an attention orienting mechanism involving suppression (i.e. inhibition of return, IOR) versus one that does not (i.e. facilitation). At test, infants in the IOR condition showed both item-specific learning and abstraction of broader category information. In contrast, infants in the facilitation condition did not discriminate across novel and familiar test items. Experiment 1b confirmed that the learning observed in the IOR condition was specific to spatial cueing of attention and was not due to timing differences across the IOR and facilitation conditions. In Experiment 2, we replicated the results of Experiment 1, using a within-subjects design to explicitly examine learning and memory encoding in the context of concurrent suppression. These data show that developing inhibitory selective attention enhances efficacy of memory encoding for subsequent retrieval. Furthermore, these results highlight the importance of considering interactions between developing attention and memory systems.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24118717      PMCID: PMC3801267          DOI: 10.1111/desc.12084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


  31 in total

1.  Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation.

Authors:  S Kastner; M A Pinsk; P De Weerd; R Desimone; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Attentional modulation of learning-related repetition attenuation effects in human parahippocampal cortex.

Authors:  Do-Joon Yi; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Attentional inhibition of visual processing in human striate and extrastriate cortex.

Authors:  Scott D Slotnick; Jens Schwarzbach; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  Infant response to stimuli of similar hue and dissimilar shape: tracing the origins of the categorization of objects by hue.

Authors:  D Catherwood; B Crassini; K Freiberg
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1989-06

6.  Adult gaze influences infant attention and object processing: implications for cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Vincent M Reid; Tricia Striano
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 7.  Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory: a hypothesis (AtoM) on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory retrieval.

Authors:  Elisa Ciaramelli; Cheryl L Grady; Morris Moscovitch
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Infants learn about objects from statistics and people.

Authors:  Rachel Wu; Alison Gopnik; Daniel C Richardson; Natasha Z Kirkham
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2011-09

9.  Attentional control constrains visual short-term memory: insights from developmental and individual differences.

Authors:  Duncan E Astle; Anna C Nobre; Gaia Scerif
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Causal role of the prefrontal cortex in top-down modulation of visual processing and working memory.

Authors:  Theodore P Zanto; Michael T Rubens; Arul Thangavel; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  11 in total

1.  Bottom-up attention orienting in young children with autism.

Authors:  Dima Amso; Sara Haas; Elena Tenenbaum; Julie Markant; Stephen J Sheinkopf
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2014-03

2.  Visual selective attention biases contribute to the other-race effect among 9-month-old infants.

Authors:  Julie Markant; Lisa M Oakes; Dima Amso
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.038

3.  What underlies visual selective attention development? Evidence that age-related improvements in visual feature integration influence visual selective attention performance.

Authors:  Andrew Lynn; Elena K Festa; William C Heindel; Dima Amso
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2019-11-23

4.  The Relation between Infant Covert Orienting, Sustained Attention and Brain Activity.

Authors:  Wanze Xie; John E Richards
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Gaining knowledge mediates changes in perception (without differences in attention): A case for perceptual learning.

Authors:  Lauren L Emberson
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 6.  The attentive brain: insights from developmental cognitive neuroscience.

Authors:  Dima Amso; Gaia Scerif
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  The Development of Selective Attention Orienting is an Agent of Change in Learning and Memory Efficacy.

Authors:  Julie Markant; Dima Amso
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2015-08-14

8.  Leveling the playing field: attention mitigates the effects of intelligence on memory.

Authors:  Julie Markant; Dima Amso
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-02-16

9.  Top-down contextual knowledge guides visual attention in infancy.

Authors:  Kristen Tummeltshammer; Dima Amso
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2017-10-26

10.  ERP markers of target selection discriminate children with high vs. low working memory capacity.

Authors:  Andria Shimi; Anna Christina Nobre; Gaia Scerif
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.