BACKGROUND: In the Spectra apheresis instrument (Terumo BCT), both manual (Spectra-MNC) and automated (Spectra-Auto) programs have been widely used to collect peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs). However, direct comparison of these programs remains extremely limited. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We investigated 188 collections and products from autologous (patient) and allogeneic (donor) subjects and analyzed a subset of 89 allogeneic collections and products. Twenty-nine subjects who received apheresis for 2 consecutive days using both programs were also evaluated with a paired crossover comparison. RESULTS: The two programs processed similar volumes, but run time was longer with Spectra-Auto. Yield and efficiency of CD34+ cell collection were similar between these programs in the whole cohort, although white blood cell (WBC) and mononuclear cell (MNC) yields were higher with Spectra-MNC. In the allogeneic cohort, yield and efficiency of WBC collection were greater in Spectra-MNC. However, collected WBCs, MNCs, and CD34+ cells were similar between these programs in paired comparison. Regardless of program, preapheresis peripheral WBC, MNC, and CD34+ cell counts correlated with the number of cells collected. In contrast, preapheresis WBC counts in the whole cohort were negatively correlated with collection efficiencies of CD34+ cells in Spectra-MNC but not Spectra-Auto. The products collected using Spectra-MNC contained more contaminating platelets (PLTs) than Spectra-Auto, with a corresponding reduction in postdonation circulating PLTs. CONCLUSION: Spectra-MNC and Spectra-Auto showed distinct features that should be considered on a case-by-case basis. Similar investigations should be undertaken as new collection platforms are introduced.
BACKGROUND: In the Spectra apheresis instrument (Terumo BCT), both manual (Spectra-MNC) and automated (Spectra-Auto) programs have been widely used to collect peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs). However, direct comparison of these programs remains extremely limited. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We investigated 188 collections and products from autologous (patient) and allogeneic (donor) subjects and analyzed a subset of 89 allogeneic collections and products. Twenty-nine subjects who received apheresis for 2 consecutive days using both programs were also evaluated with a paired crossover comparison. RESULTS: The two programs processed similar volumes, but run time was longer with Spectra-Auto. Yield and efficiency of CD34+ cell collection were similar between these programs in the whole cohort, although white blood cell (WBC) and mononuclear cell (MNC) yields were higher with Spectra-MNC. In the allogeneic cohort, yield and efficiency of WBC collection were greater in Spectra-MNC. However, collected WBCs, MNCs, and CD34+ cells were similar between these programs in paired comparison. Regardless of program, preapheresis peripheral WBC, MNC, and CD34+ cell counts correlated with the number of cells collected. In contrast, preapheresis WBC counts in the whole cohort were negatively correlated with collection efficiencies of CD34+ cells in Spectra-MNC but not Spectra-Auto. The products collected using Spectra-MNC contained more contaminating platelets (PLTs) than Spectra-Auto, with a corresponding reduction in postdonation circulating PLTs. CONCLUSION: Spectra-MNC and Spectra-Auto showed distinct features that should be considered on a case-by-case basis. Similar investigations should be undertaken as new collection platforms are introduced.