PURPOSE: To study the utility of magnetoencephalography (MEG) in patients with refractory insular epilepsy. Covered by highly functional temporal, frontal, and parietal opercula, insular-onset seizures can manifest a variety of ictal symptoms falsely leading to a diagnosis of temporal, frontal, or parietal lobe seizures. Lack of recognition of insular seizures may be responsible for some epilepsy surgery failures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed MEG data in 14 patients with refractory insular seizures defined through intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) or by the presence of an epileptogenic lesion in the insula with compatible seizure semiology. MEG was performed as part of the noninvasive presurgical evaluation, using a 275-channel whole head MEG system. MEG data were analyzed using a single equivalent current dipole model. MEG localization was compared to interictal positron emission tomography (PET) and ictal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) results and to the resection margin. KEY FINDINGS: Three patterns of MEG spike sources were observed. Seven patients showed an anterior operculoinsular clusters and two patients had a posterior operculoinsular cluster. No spikes were detected in one patient, and the remaining four patients showed a diffuse perisylvian distribution. Spike sources showed uniform orientation perpendicular to the sylvian fissure. Nine patients proceeded to insular epilepsy surgery with favorable surgical outcome. Among patients with anterior operculoinsular cluster who proceeded to have surgery, MEG provided superior information to ictal SPECT in four of six patients and to interictal PET in five of six patients. SIGNIFICANCE: MEG is useful in identifying patients who are likely to benefit from epilepsy surgery targeting the insula, particularly if a tight dipole cluster is identified even if other noninvasive modalities fail to produce localizing results. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PURPOSE: To study the utility of magnetoencephalography (MEG) in patients with refractory insular epilepsy. Covered by highly functional temporal, frontal, and parietal opercula, insular-onset seizures can manifest a variety of ictal symptoms falsely leading to a diagnosis of temporal, frontal, or parietal lobe seizures. Lack of recognition of insular seizures may be responsible for some epilepsy surgery failures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed MEG data in 14 patients with refractory insular seizures defined through intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) or by the presence of an epileptogenic lesion in the insula with compatible seizure semiology. MEG was performed as part of the noninvasive presurgical evaluation, using a 275-channel whole head MEG system. MEG data were analyzed using a single equivalent current dipole model. MEG localization was compared to interictal positron emission tomography (PET) and ictal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) results and to the resection margin. KEY FINDINGS: Three patterns of MEG spike sources were observed. Seven patients showed an anterior operculoinsular clusters and two patients had a posterior operculoinsular cluster. No spikes were detected in one patient, and the remaining four patients showed a diffuse perisylvian distribution. Spike sources showed uniform orientation perpendicular to the sylvian fissure. Nine patients proceeded to insular epilepsy surgery with favorable surgical outcome. Among patients with anterior operculoinsular cluster who proceeded to have surgery, MEG provided superior information to ictal SPECT in four of six patients and to interictal PET in five of six patients. SIGNIFICANCE: MEG is useful in identifying patients who are likely to benefit from epilepsy surgery targeting the insula, particularly if a tight dipole cluster is identified even if other noninvasive modalities fail to produce localizing results. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors: Andrew T Hale; Sonali Sen; Ali S Haider; Freedom F Perkins; Dave F Clarke; Mark R Lee; Luke D Tomycz Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Naoaki Tanaka; Christos Papadelis; Eleonora Tamilia; Michel AlHilani; Joseph R Madsen; Phillip L Pearl; Steven M Stufflebeam Journal: Pediatr Neurol Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 3.372
Authors: J S Gofshteyn; T Le; S Kessler; R Kamens; C Carr; W Gaetz; L Bloy; T P L Roberts; E S Schwartz; E D Marsh Journal: Epilepsy Res Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Barbara C Jobst; Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez; Jean Isnard; Philippe Kahane; Nuria Lacuey; Samden D Lahtoo; Dang K Nguyen; Chengyuan Wu; Fred Lado Journal: Epilepsy Curr Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 7.500