Xiahui Tan1, Michael J Sanderson. 1. Department of Microbiology and Physiological Systems, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: While selective, bitter tasting, TAS2R agonists can relax agonist-contracted airway smooth muscle (ASM), their mechanism of action is unclear. However, ASM contraction is regulated by Ca²⁺ signalling and Ca²⁺ sensitivity. We have therefore investigated how the TAS2R10 agonists chloroquine, quinine and denotonium regulate contractile agonist-induced Ca²⁺ signalling and sensitivity. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Airways in mouse lung slices were contracted with either methacholine (MCh) or 5HT and bronchodilation assessed using phase-contrast microscopy. Ca²⁺ signalling was measured with 2-photon fluorescence microscopy of ASM cells loaded with Oregon Green, a Ca²⁺-sensitive indicator (with or without caged-IP₃). Effects on Ca²⁺ sensitivity were assessed on lung slices treated with caffeine and ryanodine to permeabilize ASM cells to Ca²⁺ . KEY RESULTS: The TAS2R10 agonists dilated airways constricted by either MCh or 5HT, accompanied by inhibition of agonist-induced Ca²⁺ oscillations. However, in non-contracted airways, TAS2R10 agonists, at concentrations that maximally dilated constricted airways, did not evoke Ca²⁺ signals in ASM cells. Ca²⁺ increases mediated by the photolysis of caged-IP₃ were also attenuated by chloroquine, quinine and denotonium. In Ca²⁺-permeabilized ASM cells, the TAS2R10 agonists dilated MCh- and 5HT-constricted airways. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: TAS2R10 agonists reversed bronchoconstriction by inhibiting agonist-induced Ca²⁺ oscillations while simultaneously reducing the Ca²⁺ sensitivity of ASM cells. Reduction of Ca²⁺ oscillations may be due to inhibition of Ca²⁺ release through IP₃ receptors. Further characterization of bronchodilatory TAS2R agonists may lead to the development of novel therapies for the treatment of bronchoconstrictive conditions.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: While selective, bitter tasting, TAS2R agonists can relax agonist-contracted airway smooth muscle (ASM), their mechanism of action is unclear. However, ASM contraction is regulated by Ca²⁺ signalling and Ca²⁺ sensitivity. We have therefore investigated how the TAS2R10 agonists chloroquine, quinine and denotonium regulate contractile agonist-induced Ca²⁺ signalling and sensitivity. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Airways in mouse lung slices were contracted with either methacholine (MCh) or 5HT and bronchodilation assessed using phase-contrast microscopy. Ca²⁺ signalling was measured with 2-photon fluorescence microscopy of ASM cells loaded with Oregon Green, a Ca²⁺-sensitive indicator (with or without caged-IP₃). Effects on Ca²⁺ sensitivity were assessed on lung slices treated with caffeine and ryanodine to permeabilize ASM cells to Ca²⁺ . KEY RESULTS: The TAS2R10 agonists dilated airways constricted by either MCh or 5HT, accompanied by inhibition of agonist-induced Ca²⁺ oscillations. However, in non-contracted airways, TAS2R10 agonists, at concentrations that maximally dilated constricted airways, did not evoke Ca²⁺ signals in ASM cells. Ca²⁺ increases mediated by the photolysis of caged-IP₃ were also attenuated by chloroquine, quinine and denotonium. In Ca²⁺-permeabilized ASM cells, the TAS2R10 agonists dilated MCh- and 5HT-constricted airways. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: TAS2R10 agonists reversed bronchoconstriction by inhibiting agonist-induced Ca²⁺ oscillations while simultaneously reducing the Ca²⁺ sensitivity of ASM cells. Reduction of Ca²⁺ oscillations may be due to inhibition of Ca²⁺ release through IP₃ receptors. Further characterization of bronchodilatory TAS2R agonists may lead to the development of novel therapies for the treatment of bronchoconstrictive conditions.
Authors: Cheng-Hai Zhang; Chen Chen; Lawrence M Lifshitz; Kevin E Fogarty; Min-Sheng Zhu; Ronghua ZhuGe Journal: Nat Med Date: 2012-05-04 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Kathryn S Robinett; Deepak A Deshpande; Molly M Malone; Stephen B Liggett Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2011-06-03 Impact factor: 6.914
Authors: Deepak A Deshpande; Wayne C H Wang; Elizabeth L McIlmoyle; Kathryn S Robinett; Rachel M Schillinger; Steven S An; James S K Sham; Stephen B Liggett Journal: Nat Med Date: 2010-10-24 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Sebastian D Parlee; Becky R Simon; Erica L Scheller; Emilyn U Alejandro; Brian S Learman; Venkatesh Krishnan; Ernesto Bernal-Mizrachi; Ormond A MacDougald Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2014-01-23 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Hideki Nakano; Miranda R Lyons-Cohen; Gregory S Whitehead; Keiko Nakano; Donald N Cook Journal: J Leukoc Biol Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 4.962
Authors: Kang Wu; Qian Zhang; Xiongting Wu; Wenju Lu; Haiyang Tang; Zhihao Liang; Yali Gu; Shanshan Song; Ramon J Ayon; Ziyi Wang; Kimberly M McDermott; Angela Balistrieri; Christina Wang; Stephen M Black; Joe G N Garcia; Ayako Makino; Jason X-J Yuan; Jian Wang Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2017-10-02 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Sumati Ram-Mohan; Yan Bai; Niccole Schaible; Allen J Ehrlicher; Daniel P Cook; Bela Suki; David A Stoltz; Julian Solway; Xingbin Ai; Ramaswamy Krishnan Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Gene T Yocum; Jun Chen; Christine H Choi; Elizabeth A Townsend; Yi Zhang; Dingbang Xu; Xiao W Fu; Michael J Sanderson; Charles W Emala Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Kaizhi Zheng; Ping Lu; Ellen Delpapa; Karl Bellve; Ruitang Deng; Jennifer C Condon; Kevin Fogarty; Lawrence M Lifshitz; Tiffany A Moore Simas; Fangxiong Shi; Ronghua ZhuGe Journal: FASEB J Date: 2017-05-30 Impact factor: 5.191