Literature DB >> 24116747

A randomised prospective trial of intra-operative oesophageal Doppler-guided fluid administration in major gynaecological surgery.

M McKenny1, P Conroy, A Wong, M Farren, N Gleeson, C Walsh, C O'Malley, N Dowd.   

Abstract

Intra-operative oesophageal Doppler monitor-guided fluid management has been associated with improved postoperative length of hospital stay and morbidity in gastrointestinal and orthopaedic surgery. We designed a randomised controlled trial to test the hypothesis that this approach to intra-operative fluid management in major elective open gynaecological surgery would shorten the length of postoperative stay, defined as time to readiness for hospital discharge. Postoperative morbidity was evaluated as a secondary outcome. The oesophageal Doppler monitor group underwent intra-operative fluid management using an oesophageal Doppler-guided stroke volume optimisation algorithm. Control group (conventional fluid therapy) intra-operative fluid management was based on conventional haemodynamic indices. In a single centre, 102 patients were randomly assigned: 51 to the oesophageal Doppler monitor group (51 analysed) and 51 to the control group (50 analysed). Evaluators who were blinded to patient assignment collected postoperative outcome data. There was no difference in the length of postoperative hospital stay between the groups: median (IQR [range]) number of days until ready for discharge was 6 (5-8 [4-25]) days in the oesophageal Doppler monitor group compared with 7 (5-9 [4-42]) days in the control group, p = 0.5. There was no difference between the groups in postoperative morbidity survey scores on postoperative days 1, 3 or 5. Seven patients in the oesophageal Doppler monitor group and 11 in the control group experienced postoperative complications (p = 0.41). These findings question whether intra-operative oesophageal Doppler-guided fluid therapy is of benefit in patients undergoing open gynaecological surgery.
© 2013 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24116747     DOI: 10.1111/anae.12355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  11 in total

1.  Association of conflicts of interest with the results and conclusions of goal-directed hemodynamic therapy research: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lina Zhang; Feng Dai; Alexandria Brackett; Yuhang Ai; Lingzhong Meng
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Perioperative goal-directed fluid management using noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in gynecologic oncology.

Authors:  Gunes O Yildiz; Gulsum O Hergunsel; Gokhan Sertcakacilar; Duygu Akyol; Sema Karakaş; Zafer Cukurova
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-02-01

3.  Goal-directed haemodynamic therapy (GDHT) in surgical patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of GDHT on post-operative pulmonary complications.

Authors:  Ahilanandan Dushianthan; Martin Knight; Peter Russell; Michael Pw Grocott
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-10-15

4.  Effect of goal-directed therapy on outcome after esophageal surgery: A quality improvement study.

Authors:  Denise P Veelo; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten S Ouwehand; Bart F Geerts; Maarten C J Anderegg; Susan van Dieren; Benedikt Preckel; Jan M Binnekade; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Markus W Hollmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Effect of perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy on postoperative recovery following major abdominal surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yanxia Sun; Fang Chai; Chuxiong Pan; Jamie Lee Romeiser; Tong J Gan
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Hemodynamic goal-directed therapy and postoperative kidney injury: an updated meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Mariateresa Giglio; Lidia Dalfino; Filomena Puntillo; Nicola Brienza
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Association between perioperative fluid administration and postoperative outcomes: a 20-year systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized goal-directed trials in major visceral/noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  Antonio Messina; Chiara Robba; Lorenzo Calabrò; Daniel Zambelli; Francesca Iannuzzi; Edoardo Molinari; Silvia Scarano; Denise Battaglini; Marta Baggiani; Giacomo De Mattei; Laura Saderi; Giovanni Sotgiu; Paolo Pelosi; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Perioperative restrictive versus goal-directed fluid therapy for adults undergoing major non-cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Anna Wrzosek; Joanna Jakowicka-Wordliczek; Renata Zajaczkowska; Wojciech T Serednicki; Milosz Jankowski; Malgorzata M Bala; Mateusz J Swierz; Maciej Polak; Jerzy Wordliczek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-12

9.  Intraoperative Goal-directed Fluid Therapy in Elective Major Abdominal Surgery: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Katie E Rollins; Dileep N Lobo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Targeting urine output and 30-day mortality in goal-directed therapy: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Authors:  Esther N van der Zee; Mohamud Egal; Diederik Gommers; A B Johan Groeneveld
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.