Literature DB >> 24116340

Stuttering among children exposed to (family) high expressed emotion families.

N Aslam1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24116340      PMCID: PMC3793466          DOI: 10.4103/2141-9248.117941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res        ISSN: 2141-9248


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, Stuttering is a disorder of speech fluency that commonly appears between the age of two and five.[1] A child with stuttering not only experiences academic and social consequences,[2] but may also face the emotional/behavioral disorders.[3] Stuttering leads individuals to feel a range of negative feelings and emotions, including, low confidence,[4] frustration, shame, embarrassment, poor self-image,[5] and negative social identity[6] Parents reported emotional reactions of these children include frustration, low mood, loss of confidence, talked less overall, and withdraw from interactions. Adolescents who stutter, report higher anxiety, fear of negative evaluation, and greater difficulty with their functional communication.[7] Long-term stuttering may leave people more vulnerable to becoming socially anxious. Furthermore, those who stutter is at a greater risk of poor emotional functioning than those who stutter less severely.[8] Twin and family studies have indicated a strong genetic component associated to stutter.[9] Approximately 70% of the variance in liability for stuttering can be attributed to additive genetic effects, whereas the remaining 30% is due to non-shared environmental effects[10] Familial aggregation of stuttering is more common in Ist degree relatives.[11] Earlier researches suggest a higher concordance rate and maximum likelihood in families where a Ist degree relative has the problem. Despite the fact, that stuttering tends to run in families and underlying genetic cause, there may be the environmental factors (i.e., emotional expressive families) that includes the caregivers, who are more critical to the child. Expressed emotions (EEs) are the hostility, criticism, and over involvement demonstrated by some families toward a family member. In the case of acquired stuttering, children may develop stuttering because of derogatory and critical comments related to speech by their family members. In collective cultures, an emotionally expressive member can be any person with-in the family (i.e., grand parents, parents or the uncle). The consequences of the stuttering are devastating. The children remain with are less maturity and less success in their academic endeavors, relationships, and interactions. Children who continue to stutter into school-age and beyond may have long-term social, emotional, educational, financial, and vocational consequences.[12] The present article is aimed to raise interest on the role of socio-familial factors in stuttering. With the baseline knowledge about the role of these socio-familial therapeutic interventions can be devised for children at risk of stuttering. In our culture (i.e., Azad Kashmir), most of the time supernatural explanations are sought to explain the etiology of stammering. This is needed to be dealt with proper scientific education. Specialized in counseling services for the family members can be started that can explain the negative role of EEs for the child. The psychosocial assessment and interventions specifically focused on family psycho education can potentially reduce high EEs. Awareness campaigns, training workshops can be launched for the parents and families on the negative consequences of EEs on child. Further studies should be conducted to examine the factors that influence and explain the relationship between EEs and stuttering.
  10 in total

1.  Managing stuttering beyond the preschool years.

Authors:  Marilyn A Nippold; Ann Packman
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  An investigation into the personal financial costs associated with stuttering.

Authors:  Elaine Blumgart; Yvonne Tran; Ashley Craig
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 2.538

3.  Genetic studies of stuttering in a founder population.

Authors:  Jacqueline K Wittke-Thompson; Nicoline Ambrose; Ehud Yairi; Cheryl Roe; Edwin H Cook; Carole Ober; Nancy J Cox
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2006-12-30       Impact factor: 2.538

4.  New complexities in the genetics of stuttering: significant sex-specific linkage signals.

Authors:  Rathi Suresh; Nicoline Ambrose; Cheryl Roe; Anna Pluzhnikov; Jacqueline K Wittke-Thompson; Maggie C-Y Ng; Xiaolin Wu; Edwin H Cook; Cecilia Lundstrom; Marie Garsten; Ruth Ezrati; Ehud Yairi; Nancy J Cox
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Effects of stuttering severity and therapy involvement on attitudes towards people who stutter.

Authors:  Rodney M Gabel
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2006-07-11       Impact factor: 2.538

Review 6.  Assessing quality of life in stuttering treatment outcomes research.

Authors:  J Scott Yaruss
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 2.538

7.  Life experiences of people who stutter, and the perceived impact of stuttering on quality of life: personal accounts of South African individuals.

Authors:  Michelle Klompas; Eleanor Ross
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 2.538

8.  Social anxiety and the severity and typography of stuttering in adolescents.

Authors:  Kylie Mulcahy; Neville Hennessey; Janet Beilby; Michelle Byrnes
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 2.538

9.  Communication disorders: prevalence and comorbid intellectual disability, autism, and emotional/behavioral disorders.

Authors:  Judith Pinborough-Zimmerman; Robert Satterfield; Judith Miller; Deborah Bilder; Shaheen Hossain; William McMahon
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.408

10.  The impact of stuttering on the quality of life in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Ashley Craig; Elaine Blumgart; Yvonne Tran
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 2.538

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.