Literature DB >> 24116308

Sonographic evaluation of the splenic length in normal pregnancy in a tertiary hospital in southern Nigeria: a pilot study.

Ew Ugboma1, Haa Ugboma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The spleen is affected by the changes that occur in pregnancy. Ultrasound is the commonest imaging modality used in the evaluation of the abdominal organs in pregnancy; however, there is a paucity of information on the sonographic measurement of the splenic length in normal pregnancy in our environment. AIM: To establish sonographically the range of splenic length in normal pregnant women. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A prospective descriptive cross sectional study of the sonographic measurements of the splenic length was performed on 150 healthy normal pregnant women correlating this with the body mass index, gestational age and parity. Data were analyzed using software SPSS version 15 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Correlations and variance between variables were calculated. P values 0.05 were considered as significant.
RESULTS: A mean splenic length of 10.0 cm (SD) 1.8 throughout pregnancy was obtained with a range of 9.7-10.3 cm. The splenic length significantly correlated positively with the body mass index (r = 0.006, P < 0.01) but not with parity (r = 0.94, P < 0.01), and gestational age (r = 0.31, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: This study was able to establish a range of sonographic measurement of the splenic length for the locality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Normal pregnancy; South Nigeria; Splenic length; Ultrasound scan

Year:  2013        PMID: 24116308      PMCID: PMC3793434          DOI: 10.4103/2141-9248.117928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res        ISSN: 2141-9248


  9 in total

1.  Normal sonographic values of maternal spleen size throughout pregnancy.

Authors:  Ron Maymon; Simon Strauss; Zwi Vaknin; Zwi Weinraub; Arie Herman; Gabriela Gayer
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Sonographic evaluation of spleen size in tall healthy athletes.

Authors:  Audrey L Spielmann; David M DeLong; Mark A Kliewer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Sonographic measurement of splenic length: correlation with measurement at autopsy.

Authors:  W K Loftus; L T Chow; C Metreweli
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 0.910

4.  Ultrasound assessment of spleen size in collegiate athletes.

Authors:  R G Hosey; C G Mattacola; V Kriss; T Armsey; J D Quarles; J Jagger
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Sonographic assessment of normal spleen volume.

Authors:  A J Rodrigues Júnior; C J Rodrigues; M A Germano; I Rasera Júnior; G G Cerri
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.414

6.  Sonographic measurements of the normal liver, spleen, pancreas, and portal vein.

Authors:  C Niederau; A Sonnenberg; J E Müller; J F Erckenbrecht; T Scholten; W P Fritsch
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Measurement of spleen volume by ultrasound scanning in patients with thrombocytosis: a prospective study.

Authors:  Marco Picardi; Vincenzo Martinelli; Rosanna Ciancia; Ernesto Soscia; Roberto Morante; Antonio Sodano; Giuliana Fortunato; Bruno Rotoli
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Spleen size: how well do linear ultrasound measurements correlate with three-dimensional CT volume assessments?

Authors:  P M Lamb; A Lund; R R Kanagasabay; A Martin; J A W Webb; R H Reznek
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Examiner dependence on physical diagnostic tests for the detection of splenomegaly: a prospective study with multiple observers.

Authors:  S G Tamayo; L S Rickman; W C Mathews; S C Fullerton; A E Bartok; J T Warner; D W Feigal; D G Arnstein; N S Callandar; K D Lyche
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.128

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.