| Literature DB >> 24116026 |
Qi Chang1, Xinfang Miao, Xiaowei Ju, Lvgang Zhu, Changlin Huang, Tao Huang, Xincheng Zuo, Chunfang Gao.
Abstract
Fatigue is synonymous with a wide spectrum of familiar physiological conditions, from pathology and general health, to sport and physical exercise. Strenuous, prolonged exercise training causes fatigue. Although several studies have investigated the effects of electrical stimulation frequency on muscle fatigue, the effects of percutaneous pulse current stimulation on fatigue in the hepatic tissue of trained rats is still unclear. In order to find an effective strategy to prevent fatigue or enhance recovery, the effects of pulse current on endurance exercise and its anti-fatigue properties in exercised rats were studied. Rats were subjected to one, three or five weeks of swimming exercise training. After exercise training, rats in the treated group received daily applications of pulse current. All rats were sacrificed after one, three or five weeks of swimming exercise, and the major biochemical indexes were measured in serum and liver. The results demonstrate that pulse current could prolong the exhaustion swimming time, as well as decrease serum ALT, AST and LD levels and liver MDA content. It also elevated serum LDH activity, liver SOD activity and glycogen content. Furthermore, pulse current increased the expression of Bcl-2 and decreased the expression of Bax. Taken together, these results show that pulse current can elevate endurance capacity and facilitate recovery from fatigue.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24116026 PMCID: PMC3792977 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075093
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Effect of pulse current on swimming time to exhaustion of rats.
| groups | Swimming time to exhaustion (min) | ||
| 1 W | 3 W | 5 W | |
| control | 154.42±13.43 | 155.76±13.40 | 156.45±12.44 |
| training | 142.05±16.54 | 100.08±11.61 | 81.72±13.27 |
| A | 145.80±13.20 | 123.05±16.47 | 102.55±15.74 |
| B | 150.46±13.88 | 140.96±12.56 | 122.58±18.14 |
| C | 149.53±12.04 | 122.55±17.02 | 103.11±16.20 |
Compared with control group: P>0.05;
Compared with training group, P>0.05;
Compared with control group: P<0.05;
Compared with training group, P<0.05;
Compared with A and C group: P<0.05;
Compared with A group: P>0.05.
Effect of pulse current on ALT, AST, LD and LDA in blood serum.
| Index | Group | week | ||
| 1 W | 3 W | 5 W | ||
| ALT(U/L) | control | 38.62±3.11 | 38.75±2.92 | 38.88±2.70 |
| training | 58.25±5.82 | 65.38±5.12 | 73.00±6.37 | |
| A | 47.86±6.38 | 55.88±3.91 | 66.75±5.28 | |
| B | 39.50±5.04 | 46.00±5.34 | 58.62±7.00 | |
| C | 51.75±5.26 | 59.62±5.42 | 66.25±4.68 | |
| AST(U/L) | control | 107.25±13.02 | 108.88±16.06 | 106.50±13.79 |
| training | 149.88±14.32 | 169.25±14.60 | 187.25±16.10 | |
| A | 129.75±13.49 | 150.25±17.13 | 172.00±14.01 | |
| B | 110.12±9.85 | 128.00±19.95 | 153.50±11.56 | |
| C | 127.88±15.60 | 148.12±15.68 | 170.12±12.48 | |
| LD(mmol/L) | control | 6.52±1.99 | 6.38±1.99 | 6.33±1.94 |
| training | 14.75±2.56 | 18.89±2.50 | 22.18±2.14 | |
| A | 11.13±1.82 | 16.17±2.58 | 19.23±2.50 | |
| B | 8.05±1.80 | 12.69±1.95 | 16.04±1.97 | |
| C | 10.91±2.06 | 15.95±2.13 | 18.68±2.42 | |
| LDH (U/L) | control | 1059.75±103.88 | 1056.88±95.72 | 1058.38±99.31 |
| training | 1335.50±126.81 | 1476.50±105.30 | 1831.00±106.06 | |
| A | 1108.12±81.54 | 1261.38±144.72 | 1523.00±125.50 | |
| B | 1072.25±93.24 | 1185.38±125.12 | 1421.63±111.77 | |
| C | 1097.25±77.80 | 1232.75±137.54 | 1511.75±109.66 | |
Compared with control group: P<0.05;
Compared with stimulating groups: P<0.05;
Compared with stimulating B group: P<0.05;
Compared with stimulating A group: P>0.05;
Compared with control group: P>0.05;
Comparison between stimulating groups: P>0.05.
Effect of pulse current on SOD, MDA and glycogen contents of liver.
| Index | Group | week | ||
| 1 W | 3 W | 5 W | ||
| SOD(U/mgprot) | control | 323.96±23.72 | 322.22±21.24 | 314.88±19.33 |
| Training | 259.90±24.87 | 226.70±17.65 | 211.40±21.74 | |
| B | 322.94±20.90 | 290.79±15.02 | 262.44±23.00 | |
| MDA(U/mgprot) | control | 7.19±0.45 | 7.24±0.53 | 7.15±0.47 |
| Training | 9.60±0.70 | 11.18±0.63 | 12.37±0.67 | |
| B | 7.25±0.52 | 8.12±0.57 | 9.59±0.81 | |
| Glycogen(mg/g) | control | 20.80±1.34 | 20.82±1.07 | 20.89±1.61 |
| Training | 15.67±1.80 | 12.37±1.56 | 10.63±1.47 | |
| B | 21.27±1.80 | 18.56±1.53 | 16.18±1.54 | |
Compared with control group: P>0.05;
Compared with control group: P<0.05;
Compared with exercise training group: P<0.05.
Figure 1Sections of liver tissue were stained with hematoxylin and eosin.
A, control group; B, five weeks exercise-training group; C, five weeks stimulating group.
Figure 2TEM of liver tissue.
A and B, control group; C, one week exercise-training group; D, one week stimulating group; E, three weeks exercise-training group; F, three weeks stimulating group; G, five weeks exercise-training group; H, five weeks stimulating group.
Figure 3Immunohistochemical staining of Bcl-2 and Bax in liver tissue.
A, Bcl-2 of control group; B, Bax of control group; C, Bcl-2 of one week exercise-training group; D, Bax of one week exercise-training group; E, Bcl-2 of one week stimulating group; F, Bax of one week stimulating group; G, Bcl-2 of three weeks exercise-training group; H, Bax of three weeks exercise-training group; I, Bcl-2 of three weeks stimulating group; J, Bax of three weeks stimulating group; K, Bcl-2 of five weeks exercise-training group; L, Bax of five weeks exercise-training group; M, Bcl-2 of five weeks stimulating group; N, Bax of five weeks stimulating group.
Effect of pulse current on the expression of Bcl-2 and Bax.
| week | Group | Bcl-2 (IOD) | Bax (IOD) | Bcl-2/Bax |
| 1 W | control | 63.40±6.73 | 68.42±5.84 | 0.9250±0.0316 |
| training | 61.21±5.65 | 89.95±6.41 | 0.6788±0.0295 | |
| B | 62.89±5.04 | 68.03±6.06 | 0.6788±0.0295 | |
| 3 W | control | 65.38±3.96 | 69.86±5.03 | 0.9349±0.0333 |
| training | 54.39±5.68 | 107.99±4.69 | 0.5025±0.0413 | |
| B | 61.60±5.79 | 92.63±9.53 | 0.6675±0.0570 | |
| 5 W | control | 62.71±4.26 | 67.86±4.53 | 0.9238±0.0350 |
| training | 48.10±5.05 | 120.08±4.08 | 0.4000±0.0457 | |
| B | 54.43±4.84 | 109.64±7.03 | 0.4963±0.0385 |
Compared with control group: P>0.05;
Compared with training group: P>0.05;
Compared with control group: P<0.05;
Compared with training group: P<0.05.