Literature DB >> 24115780

A Simulation Based Evaluation of the Asymptotic Power Formulae for Cox Models in Small Sample Cases.

Mehmet Kocak1, Arzu Onar-Thomas.   

Abstract

Cox proportional hazards (PH) models are commonly used in medical research to investigate the associations between covariates and time to event outcomes. It is frequently noted that with less than ten events per covariate, these models produce spurious results, and therefore, should not be used. Statistical literature contains asymptotic power formulae for the Cox model which can be used to determine the number of events needed to detect an association. Here we investigate via simulations the performance of these formulae in small sample settings for Cox models with 1- or 2-covariates. Our simulations indicate that, when the number of events is small, the power estimate based on the asymptotic formulae is often inflated. The discrepancy between the asymptotic and empirical power is larger for the dichotomous covariate especially in cases where allocation of sample size to its levels is unequal. When more than one covariate is included in the same model, the discrepancy between the asymptotic power and the empirical power is even larger, especially when a high positive correlation exists between the two covariates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cox Proportional Hazards Model; Time to event data; event size formula; number of events per covariate

Year:  2012        PMID: 24115780      PMCID: PMC3791864          DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2012.703873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Stat        ISSN: 0003-1305            Impact factor:   8.710


  7 in total

1.  Sample-size calculations for the Cox proportional hazards regression model with nonbinary covariates.

Authors:  F Y Hsieh; P W Lavori
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2000-12

2.  Sample size formula for proportional hazards modelling of competing risks.

Authors:  Aurélien Latouche; Raphaël Porcher; Sylvie Chevret
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression.

Authors:  Eric Vittinghoff; Charles E McCulloch
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis. II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates.

Authors:  P Peduzzi; J Concato; A R Feinstein; T R Holford
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards analysis. I. Background, goals, and general strategy.

Authors:  J Concato; P Peduzzi; T R Holford; A R Feinstein
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Sample-size formula for the proportional-hazards regression model.

Authors:  D A Schoenfeld
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Survival analysis Part III: multivariate data analysis -- choosing a model and assessing its adequacy and fit.

Authors:  M J Bradburn; T G Clark; S B Love; D G Altman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Outcome of Liver Transplant Recipients With Revascularized Coronary Artery Disease: A Comparative Analysis With and Without Cardiovascular Risk Factors.

Authors:  Sanjaya K Satapathy; Jason M Vanatta; Ryan A Helmick; Albert Flowers; Satish K Kedia; Yu Jiang; Bilal Ali; James Eason; Satheesh P Nair; Uzoma N Ibebuogu
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Outcomes of Liver Transplant Recipients With Autoimmune Liver Disease Using Long-Term Dual Immunosuppression Regimen Without Corticosteroid.

Authors:  Sanjaya K Satapathy; Ollie D Jones; Jason M Vanatta; Faisal Kamal; Satish K Kedia; Yu Jiang; Satheesh P Nair; James D Eason
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2017-06-23

3.  Neutrophil-mediated oxidative stress and albumin structural damage predict COVID-19-associated mortality.

Authors:  Mohamed A Badawy; Basma A Yasseen; Riem M El-Messiery; Engy A Abdel-Rahman; Aya A Elkhodiry; Azza G Kamel; Hajar El-Sayed; Asmaa M Shedra; Rehab Hamdy; Mona Zidan; Diaa Al-Raawi; Mahmoud Hammad; Nahla Elsharkawy; Mohamed El Ansary; Ahmed Al-Halfawy; Alaa Elhadad; Ashraf Hatem; Sherif Abouelnaga; Laura L Dugan; Sameh Saad Ali
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Proximal femoral reconstruction with modular megaprostheses in non-oncological patients.

Authors:  Kevin Döring; Klemens Vertesich; Luca Martelanz; Kevin Staats; Christoph Böhler; Christian Hipfl; Reinhard Windhager; Stephan Puchner
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.075

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.