Literature DB >> 2411516

Auditory middle latency responses in children: effects of age and diagnostic category.

N Kraus, D I Smith, N L Reed, L K Stein, C Cartee.   

Abstract

The nature of auditory middle latency responses (MLRs) in children has been the subject of considerable debate. In order to study MLRs as a function of age, MLRs were obtained in 217 subjects ranging in age from 6 days to 20 years, all with normal auditory brain-stem responses (ABRs). Subjects were classified into several diagnostic categories: normal; communicative disorders (language delay, learning disability); mentally retarded, multiply handicapped; and post-meningitic. Age effects, the effects of diagnostic category, and possible differences in MLRs of males vs. females and right vs. left ears were examined. The detectability of both Na and Pa was found to increase significantly as a function of age. Detection of these MLR components became similar to adult values (approaching 100% detectability) at approximately 10 years of age. No significant differences were found among diagnostic categories. There were also no significant differences in the detectability of MLRs in males as compared to females, and there were no right vs. left ear differences. The strong age effect which appears to exist in the MLR influences their clinical use. When responses are present, they may be useful indicators of hearing sensitivity, but the absence of MLRs in children cannot be taken as an indication of hearing loss. Similarly, absent or abnormal MLRs cannot be interpreted as a manifestation of auditory pathway dysfunction, since there appears to be little difference in MLRs in normal subjects and MLRs in patients with a wide range of neurologic, cognitive, and speech and language disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2411516     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(85)90043-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  7 in total

1.  [Detection of intraoperative awareness via auditory evoked potentials in an infant].

Authors:  M S Feuerecker; M Daunderer; N-B Pape; G E H Kuhnle
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Magnetoencephalography and the infant brain.

Authors:  Yu-Han Chen; Joni Saby; Emily Kuschner; William Gaetz; J Christopher Edgar; Timothy P L Roberts
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Brainstem and middle latency auditory evoked potentials in autism and developmental language disorder.

Authors:  C Grillon; E Courchesne; N Akshoomoff
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  1989-06

4.  Analysis of p1 latency in normal hearing and profound sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Jeong Hun Jang; Hyun Kyung Jang; Sung Eun Kim; Seung Ha Oh; Sun O Chang; Jun Ho Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.372

5.  Mapping symbols to sounds: electrophysiological correlates of the impaired reading process in dyslexia.

Authors:  Andreas Widmann; Erich Schröger; Mari Tervaniemi; Satu Pakarinen; Teija Kujala
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-03-02

6.  Maturational Changes in Ear Advantage for Monaural Word Recognition in Noise Among Listeners with Central Auditory Processing Disorders.

Authors:  Mohsin Ahmed Shaikh; Lisa Fox-Thomas; Denise Tucker
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2017-02-24

7.  Auditory Middle Latency Responses: a study of healthy children.

Authors:  Ana Claudia Figueiredo Frizzo; Carolina Araújo Rodrigues Funayama; Myriam Lima Isaac; José Fernando Colafêmina
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007 May-Jun
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.