Literature DB >> 24115100

Temporal trends in obesity, osteoporosis treatment, bone mineral density, and fracture rates: a population-based historical cohort study.

William D Leslie1, Lisa M Lix, Marina S Yogendran, Suzanne N Morin, Colleen J Metge, Sumit R Majumdar.   

Abstract

Diverging international trends in fracture rates have been observed, with most reports showing that fracture rates have stabilized or decreased in North American and many European populations. We studied two complementary population-based historical cohorts from the Province of Manitoba, Canada (1996-2006) to determine whether declining osteoporotic fracture rates in Canada are attributable to trends in obesity, osteoporosis treatment, or bone mineral density (BMD). The Population Fracture Registry included women aged 50 years and older with major osteoporotic fractures, and was used to assess impact of changes in osteoporosis treatment. The BMD Registry included all women aged 50 years and older undergoing BMD tests, and was used to assess impact of changes in obesity and BMD. Model-based estimates of temporal changes in fracture rates (Fracture Registry) were calculated. Temporal changes in obesity and BMD and their association with fracture rates (BMD Registry) were estimated. In the Fracture Registry (n=27,341), fracture rates declined 1.6% per year (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3% to 2.0%). Although osteoporosis treatment increased from 5.6% to 17.4%, the decline in fractures was independent of osteoporosis treatment. In the BMD Registry (n=36,587), obesity increased from 12.7% to 27.4%. Femoral neck BMD increased 0.52% per year and lumbar spine BMD increased 0.32% per year after covariate adjustment (p<0.001). Major osteoporotic fracture rates decreased in models that did not include femoral neck BMD (fully adjusted annual change -1.8%; 95% CI, -2.9 to -0.5), but adjusting for femoral neck BMD accounted for the observed reduction (annual change -0.5%; 95% CI, -1.8 to +1.0). In summary, major osteoporotic fracture rates declined substantially and linearly from 1996 to 2006, and this was explained by improvements in BMD rather than greater rates of obesity or osteoporosis treatment.
© 2014 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BONE MINERAL DENSITY; DXA; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FRACTURES; OSTEOPOROSIS

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24115100     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  5 in total

1.  Secular trends of hip fractures in France: impact of changing characteristics of the background population.

Authors:  R Garofoli; M Maravic; A Ostertag; M Cohen-Solal
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Hip fracture incidence and social deprivation: results from a French ecological study.

Authors:  M -P Petit; J Bryère; M Maravic; F Pallaro; C Marcelli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Comparison of Bone Mineral Density in Lumbar Spine and Fracture Rate among Eight Drugs in Treatments of Osteoporosis in Men: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ling-Xiao Chen; Zhi-Rui Zhou; Yu-Lin Li; Guang-Zhi Ning; Tian-Song Zhang; Di Zhang; Shi-Qing Feng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Recent hip fracture trends in Sweden and Denmark with age-period-cohort effects.

Authors:  B E Rosengren; J Björk; C Cooper; B Abrahamsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Association of Osteoporosis with Anthropometric Measures in a Representative Sample of Iranian Adults: The Iranian Multicenter Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  Shirin Hasani-Ranjbar; Shahrzad Jafari-Adli; Moloud Payab; Mostafa Qorbani; Farzaneh Ahanjideh; Abbasali Keshtkar; Bagher Larijani
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2019-10-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.