Literature DB >> 24114912

Comparison of two immunoassays for measurement of faecal calprotectin in detection of inflammatory bowel disease: (pre)-analytical and diagnostic performance characteristics.

Matthijs Oyaert, Charlotte Trouvé, Filip Baert, Dieter De Smet, Michel Langlois, Hilde Vanpoucke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) can overlap. Faecal calprotectin has recently been established to be a non-invasive marker for neutrophilic intestinal inflammation. We compared two devices for extraction of faecal calprotectin. Based on these results, two immunoassays for measurement of faecal calprotectin were evaluated.
METHODS: Samples were extracted using the Thermo Fisher extraction device (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Smart Pep extraction device (Roche Diagnostics) and measured with the EliA Calprotectin immunoassay (Thermo Fisher Scientific) on ImmunoCAP 250. The performance of both assays was investigated by enrolling 183 consecutive patients (79 males, 104 females; median age 32 years) with clinical suspicion of IBD. Faecal calprotectin was measured using a recently launched immunoassay, EliA Calprotectin in comparison with an established immunochomatographic point-of-care-test (POCT, Quantum Blue Calprotectin; Bühlmann). Results were compared with endoscopic and histological findings.
RESULTS: The use of the Thermo Fisher extraction device resulted in an underestimation of faecal calprotectin concentrations, especially in liquid stool samples. IBD was diagnosed in 51/183 patients (27.9%) [Crohn's disease (CD, n=37), ulcerative colitis (UC, n=14)]. After adjusting the optimal cut-off for detection of IBD using receiver operating curve analysis, a sensitivity of 94.1% and 90.2% and specificity of 87.9% and 90.9% for the EliA and POCT assay, respectively, were obtained.
CONCLUSIONS: The Thermo Fisher device is not reliable for extraction of faecal calprotectin. The performance characteristics of the EliA Calprotectin assay are statistically equivalent to the Bühlmann POCT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24114912     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2013-0699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  14 in total

Review 1.  Practical guidance on the use of faecal calprotectin.

Authors:  Matthew J Brookes; Simon Whitehead; Daniel R Gaya; Antony Barney Hawthorne
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02-22

Review 2.  Comparing outcomes from tailored meta-analysis with outcomes from a setting specific test accuracy study using routine data of faecal calprotectin testing for inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Karoline Freeman; Brian H Willis; Ronan Ryan; Sian Taylor-Phillips; Aileen Clarke
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.612

3.  Accuracy of three different fecal calprotectin tests in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Hui Won Jang; Hyun Sook Kim; Soo Jung Park; Sung Pil Hong; Tae Il Kim; Won Ho Kim; Jae Hee Cheon
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2016-10-17

4.  Comparison of Fecal Calprotectin Methods for Predicting Relapse of Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Saranya Kittanakom; Md Sharif Shajib; Kristine Garvie; Joceline Turner; Dan Brooks; Sufian Odeh; Robert Issenman; V Tony Chetty; Joseph Macri; Waliul I Khan
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-04-16

5.  Predicting inflammatory bowel disease in children with abdominal pain and diarrhoea: calgranulin-C versus calprotectin stool tests.

Authors:  Anke Heida; Els Van de Vijver; Don van Ravenzwaaij; Stephanie Van Biervliet; Thalia Z Hummel; Zehre Yuksel; Gieneke Gonera-de Jong; Renate Schulenberg; Anneke Muller Kobold; Patrick Ferry van Rheenen
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Analytical and clinical performance of the fully-automated LIAISONXL calprotectin immunoassay from DiaSorin in IBD patients.

Authors:  R Vicente-Steijn; J M Jansen; R Bisheshar; I-A Haagen
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2020-06-24

7.  Faecal calprotectin to detect inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis of test accuracy.

Authors:  Karoline Freeman; Brian H Willis; Hannah Fraser; Sian Taylor-Phillips; Aileen Clarke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Detection of calprotectin in inflammatory bowel disease: Fecal and serum levels and immunohistochemical localization.

Authors:  Shuhei Fukunaga; Kotaro Kuwaki; Keiichi Mitsuyama; Hidetoshi Takedatsu; Shinichiro Yoshioka; Hiroshi Yamasaki; Ryosuke Yamauchi; Atsushi Mori; Tatsuyuki Kakuma; Osamu Tsuruta; Takuji Torimura
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.101

9.  Fecal calprotectin correlates with active colonic inflammatory bowel disease but not with small intestinal Crohn's disease activity.

Authors:  Eran Zittan; Orlaith B Kelly; Ian M Gralnek; Mark S Silverberg; A Hillary Steinhart
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2018-07-17

10.  Faecal calprotectin determination: impact of preanalytical sample treatment and stool consistency on within- and between-method variability.

Authors:  Gordana Juricic; Tina Brencic; Andrea Tesija-Kuna; Milena Njegovan; Lorena Honovic
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 2.313

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.