Literature DB >> 24114857

Discordance in ERα, PR and HER2 receptor status across different distant breast cancer metastases within the same patient.

L D C Hoefnagel1, P van der Groep, M J van de Vijver, J E Boers, P Wesseling, J Wesseling, E van der Wall, P J van Diest.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We studied discordance in estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status between multiple distant metastases from the same breast cancer patient.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multiple distant metastases from 55 female patients were stained for ERα, PR and HER2 by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization for confirmation of the HER2 status.
RESULTS: Different metastatic sites within the same patient showed discordance in ERα receptor status in 7.3% or 10.9% of patients (using a 10% or 1% threshold for positivity, respectively). For PR, 29.1% or 30.9% of patients showed discordance. Taking ERα and PR together, 36.4% of cases (both thresholds) showed discrepancy between metastases. In 10.9% (10% threshold) or 14.5% of patients (1% threshold), such discordance could have clinical consequences with regard to hormonal treatment. For HER2, there was 3.6% discordance on the immunohistochemical level but 0% on the gene level.
CONCLUSION: In a significant proportion of metastatic breast cancer patients, discordance in ERα and PR receptor status between different metastatic sites was observed. This implies that multiple metastases may need to be biopsied to optimally reassess receptors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERα; HER2; PR; breast cancer; immunohistochemistry; multiple metastases

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24114857     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  21 in total

1.  Deciding site of biopsy at metastatic relapse.

Authors:  Ajit Venniyoor
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 2.  Genetic insights into the morass of metastatic heterogeneity.

Authors:  Kent W Hunter; Ruhul Amin; Sarah Deasy; Ngoc-Han Ha; Lalage Wakefield
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 3.  Challenges in the management of advanced, ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Christopher D Hart; Ilenia Migliaccio; Luca Malorni; Cristina Guarducci; Laura Biganzoli; Angelo Di Leo
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Metastasis-Specific Gene Expression in Autochthonous and Allograft Mouse Mammary Tumor Models: Stratification and Identification of Targetable Signatures.

Authors:  Christina Ross; Karol Szczepanek; Maxwell Lee; Howard Yang; Cody J Peer; Jessica Kindrick; Priya Shankarappa; Zhi-Wei Lin; Jack D Sanford; William D Figg; Kent W Hunter
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 5.852

5.  Genomic Heterogeneity as a Barrier to Precision Medicine in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Eirini Pectasides; Matthew D Stachler; Sarah Derks; Yang Liu; Steven Maron; Adam J Bass; Daniel V Catenacci; Mirazul Islam; Lindsay Alpert; Heewon Kwak; Hedy Kindler; Blase Polite; Manish R Sharma; Kenisha Allen; Emily O'Day; Samantha Lomnicki; Melissa Maranto; Rajani Kanteti; Carrie Fitzpatrick; Christopher Weber; Namrata Setia; Shu-Yuan Xiao; John Hart; Rebecca J Nagy; Kyoung-Mee Kim; Min-Gew Choi; Byung-Hoon Min; Katie S Nason; Lea O'Keefe; Masayuki Watanabe; Hideo Baba; Rick Lanman; Agoston T Agoston; David J Oh; Andrew Dunford; Aaron R Thorner; Matthew D Ducar; Bruce M Wollison; Haley A Coleman; Yuan Ji; Mitchell C Posner; Kevin Roggin; Kiran Turaga; Paul Chang; Kyle Hogarth; Uzma Siddiqui; Andres Gelrud; Gavin Ha; Samuel S Freeman; Justin Rhoades; Sarah Reed; Greg Gydush; Denisse Rotem; Jon Davison; Yu Imamura; Viktor Adalsteinsson; Jeeyun Lee
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 39.397

6.  The bone microenvironment increases phenotypic plasticity of ER+ breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Igor L Bado; Weijie Zhang; Jingyuan Hu; Zhan Xu; Hai Wang; Poonam Sarkar; Lucian Li; Ying-Wooi Wan; Jun Liu; William Wu; Hin Ching Lo; Ik Sun Kim; Swarnima Singh; Mahnaz Janghorban; Aaron M Muscarella; Amit Goldstein; Purba Singh; Hyun-Hwan Jeong; Chaozhong Liu; Rachel Schiff; Shixia Huang; Matthew J Ellis; M Waleed Gaber; Zbigniew Gugala; Zhandong Liu; Xiang H-F Zhang
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 12.270

7.  Clonal expansion and linear genome evolution through breast cancer progression from pre-invasive stages to asynchronous metastasis.

Authors:  Anne Bruun Krøigård; Martin Jakob Larsen; Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm; Ann S Knoop; Jeanette D Jensen; Martin Bak; Jan Mollenhauer; Torben A Kruse; Mads Thomassen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-03-20

8.  Promoter hypermethylation profiling of distant breast cancer metastases.

Authors:  Willemijne A M E Schrijver; Laura S Jiwa; Paul J van Diest; Cathy B Moelans
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Contrasting breast cancer molecular subtypes across serial tumor progression stages: biological and prognostic implications.

Authors:  Siker Kimbung; Anikó Kovács; Anna Danielsson; Pär-Ola Bendahl; Kristina Lövgren; Marianne Frostvik Stolt; Nicholas P Tobin; Linda Lindström; Jonas Bergh; Zakaria Einbeigi; Mårten Fernö; Thomas Hatschek; Ingrid Hedenfalk
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-10-20

Review 10.  The use of molecular imaging combined with genomic techniques to understand the heterogeneity in cancer metastasis.

Authors:  R Chowdhury; B Ganeshan; S Irshad; K Lawler; M Eisenblätter; H Milewicz; M Rodriguez-Justo; K Miles; P Ellis; A Groves; S Punwani; T Ng
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.