BACKGROUND: We studied discordance in estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status between multiple distant metastases from the same breast cancer patient. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multiple distant metastases from 55 female patients were stained for ERα, PR and HER2 by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization for confirmation of the HER2 status. RESULTS: Different metastatic sites within the same patient showed discordance in ERα receptor status in 7.3% or 10.9% of patients (using a 10% or 1% threshold for positivity, respectively). For PR, 29.1% or 30.9% of patients showed discordance. Taking ERα and PR together, 36.4% of cases (both thresholds) showed discrepancy between metastases. In 10.9% (10% threshold) or 14.5% of patients (1% threshold), such discordance could have clinical consequences with regard to hormonal treatment. For HER2, there was 3.6% discordance on the immunohistochemical level but 0% on the gene level. CONCLUSION: In a significant proportion of metastatic breast cancer patients, discordance in ERα and PR receptor status between different metastatic sites was observed. This implies that multiple metastases may need to be biopsied to optimally reassess receptors.
BACKGROUND: We studied discordance in estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), progesterone receptor (PR) and humanepidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status between multiple distant metastases from the same breast cancerpatient. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multiple distant metastases from 55 female patients were stained for ERα, PR and HER2 by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization for confirmation of the HER2 status. RESULTS: Different metastatic sites within the same patient showed discordance in ERα receptor status in 7.3% or 10.9% of patients (using a 10% or 1% threshold for positivity, respectively). For PR, 29.1% or 30.9% of patients showed discordance. Taking ERα and PR together, 36.4% of cases (both thresholds) showed discrepancy between metastases. In 10.9% (10% threshold) or 14.5% of patients (1% threshold), such discordance could have clinical consequences with regard to hormonal treatment. For HER2, there was 3.6% discordance on the immunohistochemical level but 0% on the gene level. CONCLUSION: In a significant proportion of metastatic breast cancerpatients, discordance in ERα and PR receptor status between different metastatic sites was observed. This implies that multiple metastases may need to be biopsied to optimally reassess receptors.
Entities:
Keywords:
ERα; HER2; PR; breast cancer; immunohistochemistry; multiple metastases
Authors: Christopher D Hart; Ilenia Migliaccio; Luca Malorni; Cristina Guarducci; Laura Biganzoli; Angelo Di Leo Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2015-05-26 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Christina Ross; Karol Szczepanek; Maxwell Lee; Howard Yang; Cody J Peer; Jessica Kindrick; Priya Shankarappa; Zhi-Wei Lin; Jack D Sanford; William D Figg; Kent W Hunter Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2020-06-08 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: Eirini Pectasides; Matthew D Stachler; Sarah Derks; Yang Liu; Steven Maron; Adam J Bass; Daniel V Catenacci; Mirazul Islam; Lindsay Alpert; Heewon Kwak; Hedy Kindler; Blase Polite; Manish R Sharma; Kenisha Allen; Emily O'Day; Samantha Lomnicki; Melissa Maranto; Rajani Kanteti; Carrie Fitzpatrick; Christopher Weber; Namrata Setia; Shu-Yuan Xiao; John Hart; Rebecca J Nagy; Kyoung-Mee Kim; Min-Gew Choi; Byung-Hoon Min; Katie S Nason; Lea O'Keefe; Masayuki Watanabe; Hideo Baba; Rick Lanman; Agoston T Agoston; David J Oh; Andrew Dunford; Aaron R Thorner; Matthew D Ducar; Bruce M Wollison; Haley A Coleman; Yuan Ji; Mitchell C Posner; Kevin Roggin; Kiran Turaga; Paul Chang; Kyle Hogarth; Uzma Siddiqui; Andres Gelrud; Gavin Ha; Samuel S Freeman; Justin Rhoades; Sarah Reed; Greg Gydush; Denisse Rotem; Jon Davison; Yu Imamura; Viktor Adalsteinsson; Jeeyun Lee Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2017-10-04 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Igor L Bado; Weijie Zhang; Jingyuan Hu; Zhan Xu; Hai Wang; Poonam Sarkar; Lucian Li; Ying-Wooi Wan; Jun Liu; William Wu; Hin Ching Lo; Ik Sun Kim; Swarnima Singh; Mahnaz Janghorban; Aaron M Muscarella; Amit Goldstein; Purba Singh; Hyun-Hwan Jeong; Chaozhong Liu; Rachel Schiff; Shixia Huang; Matthew J Ellis; M Waleed Gaber; Zbigniew Gugala; Zhandong Liu; Xiang H-F Zhang Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2021-04-19 Impact factor: 12.270
Authors: Anne Bruun Krøigård; Martin Jakob Larsen; Anne-Vibeke Lænkholm; Ann S Knoop; Jeanette D Jensen; Martin Bak; Jan Mollenhauer; Torben A Kruse; Mads Thomassen Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2015-03-20
Authors: Willemijne A M E Schrijver; Laura S Jiwa; Paul J van Diest; Cathy B Moelans Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2015-04-05 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Siker Kimbung; Anikó Kovács; Anna Danielsson; Pär-Ola Bendahl; Kristina Lövgren; Marianne Frostvik Stolt; Nicholas P Tobin; Linda Lindström; Jonas Bergh; Zakaria Einbeigi; Mårten Fernö; Thomas Hatschek; Ingrid Hedenfalk Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2015-10-20
Authors: R Chowdhury; B Ganeshan; S Irshad; K Lawler; M Eisenblätter; H Milewicz; M Rodriguez-Justo; K Miles; P Ellis; A Groves; S Punwani; T Ng Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 3.039