Literature DB >> 24114749

Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for smoking patients.

Sung-Jae Kim1, Su-Keon Lee, Chong Hyuk Choi, Sung-Hwan Kim, Seong-Hun Kim, Min Jung.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been no previous study regarding graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction for smoking patients.
PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes of ACL reconstruction between smokers and nonsmokers and to find an optimal graft in ACL reconstruction with regard to clinical outcomes for smoking patients. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: A total of 487 patients who underwent unilateral ACL reconstruction were retrospectively reviewed. Included patients were divided into 2 groups according to their history of smoking. Group 1 was composed of patients who had never smoked (n = 322), and group 2 consisted of patients who had reported smoking before ACL reconstruction and during rehabilitation (n = 165). Additionally, each group was divided into 4 subgroups according to the selected graft type (bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft, hamstring [semitendinosus-gracilis] tendon autograft, quadriceps tendon-bone autograft, or Achilles tendon-bone allograft). Patients were assessed for knee instability with the Lachman and pivot-shift tests as well as anterior translation measured by the KT-2000 arthrometer. Functional outcomes were evaluated with the Lysholm knee score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, and IKDC objective grade.
RESULTS: The minimum follow-up period was 24 months. At the final follow-up evaluation, there were significant mean between-group differences regarding the side-to-side difference in anterior translation (group 1, 2.15 ± 1.11 mm; group 2, 2.88 ± 1.38 mm; P < .001), Lysholm knee score (group 1, 90.25 ± 6.18; group 2, 84.79 ± 6.67; P < .001), IKDC subjective score (group 1, 89.16 ± 5.01; group 2, 83.60 ± 7.48; P < .001), and IKDC objective grade (group 1, grade A = 151, B = 130, C = 36, D = 5 patients; group 2, grade A = 48, B = 71, C = 37, D = 9 patients; P < .001). With regard to differences in outcomes between the selected grafts within each group, the Achilles tendon-bone allograft showed the worst outcomes, with statistically significant mean differences for smoking patients in the side-to-side difference in anterior translation (3.59 ± 1.26 mm), Lysholm knee score (81.05 ± 2.82), and IKDC subjective score (79.73 ± 4.29).
CONCLUSION: Unsatisfactory outcomes with regard to stability and functional scores were shown in the smoking group compared with the nonsmoking group. In smokers, the patients receiving an Achilles tendon-bone allograft had poorer outcomes than those with autografts. The bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft is recommendable for ACL reconstruction in a smoking patient.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior cruciate ligament; arthroscopic surgery; graft; reconstruction; risk factor; smoking

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24114749     DOI: 10.1177/0363546513505191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  11 in total

1.  Bone-Albumin filling decreases donor site morbidity and enhances bone formation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts.

Authors:  Károly Schandl; Dénes B Horváthy; Attila Doros; Ernő Majzik; Charlotte M Schwarz; Lajos Csönge; Géza Abkarovits; László Bucsi; Zsombor Lacza
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The Effect of Tobacco Smoking on Musculoskeletal Health: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ahmad M Al-Bashaireh; Linda G Haddad; Michael Weaver; Debra Lynch Kelly; Xing Chengguo; Saunjoo Yoon
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2018-07-11

Review 3.  Principles of postoperative anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation.

Authors:  Tolga Saka
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-09-18

4.  There is no difference between quadriceps- and hamstring tendon autografts in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 2-year patient-reported outcome study.

Authors:  Armin Runer; Guido Wierer; Elmar Herbst; Caroline Hepperger; Mirco Herbort; Peter Gföller; Christian Hoser; Christian Fink
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Evaluation of the short-term outcomes of anatomic ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft in patients with generalized joint laxity: A retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Nima Hosseinzadeh; Mehdi Mohammadpour; Mehdi Moghtadaei; Hossein Farahini; Ahmad Khazanchin; Shirin Nasiri; Amir Khazanchin
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-09-20

6.  Effect of Cigarette Smoking on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: A Matched-Pair Controlled Study With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Ajay C Lall; Jon E Hammarstedt; Asheesh G Gupta; Joseph R Laseter; Mitchell R Mohr; Itay Perets; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-01-29

Review 7.  Quadriceps tendon autograft for primary ACL reconstruction: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Jörg Eschweiler; Yasser El Mansy; Valentin Quack; Markus Tingart; Arne Driessen
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-05-04

8.  MRI evaluation to predict tendon size for knee ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Lawrence Camarda; Emanuele Grassedonio; Domenico Albano; Massimo Galia; Massimo Midiri; Michele D'Arienzo
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2018-01-10

9.  Bone Versus All Soft Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Raphael J Crum; Jeffrey Kay; Bryson P Lesniak; Alan Getgood; Volker Musahl; Darren de Sa
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  The Quad Link Technique for an All-Soft-Tissue Quadriceps Graft in Minimally Invasive, All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Gregory R Sprowls; Brett N Robin
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2018-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.