Literature DB >> 24114412

Technical note: geometric morphometrics and sexual dimorphism of the greater sciatic notch in adults from two skeletal collections: the accuracy and reliability of sex classification.

Jana Velemínská1, Václav Krajíček, Ján Dupej, Jorge A Goméz-Valdés, Petr Velemínský, Alena Šefčáková, Josef Pelikán, Gabriela Sánchez-Mejorada, Jaroslav Brůžek.   

Abstract

The greater sciatic notch (GSN) is one of the most important and frequently used characteristics for determining the sex of skeletons, but objective assessment of this characteristic is not without its difficulties. We tested the robustness of GSN sex classification on the basis of geometric morphometrics (GM) and support vector machines (SVM), using two different population samples. Using photographs, the shape of the GSN in 229 samples from two assemblages (documented collections of a Euroamerican population from the Maxwell Museum, University of New Mexico, and a Hispanic population from Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City) was segmented automatically and evaluated using six curve representations. The optimal dimensionality for each representation was determined by finding the best sex classification. The classification accuracy of the six curve representations in our study was similar but the highest and concurrently homologous cross-validated accuracy of 92% was achieved for a pooled sample using Fourier coefficient and Legendre polynomial methods. The success rate of our classification was influenced by the number of semilandmarks or coefficients and was only slightly affected by GSN marginal point positions. The intrapopulation variability of the female GSN shape was significantly lower compared with the male variability, possibly as a consequence of the intense selection pressure associated with reproduction. Males were misclassified more often than females. Our results show that by using a suitable GSN curve representation, a GM approach, and SVM analysis, it is possible to obtain a robust separation between the sexes that is stable for a multipopulation sample.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SVM learning model; curve segmentation; hip bone; sex assessment; shape analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24114412     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  5 in total

Review 1.  Elliptical Fourier analysis: fundamentals, applications, and value for forensic anthropology.

Authors:  Jodi Caple; John Byrd; Carl N Stephan
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Morphometric analysis of pelvic sexual dimorphism in a contemporary Western Australian population.

Authors:  Daniel Franklin; Andrea Cardini; Ambika Flavel; Murray K Marks
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Can you make morphometrics work when you know the right answer? Pick and mix approaches for apple identification.

Authors:  Maria D Christodoulou; Nicholas Hugh Battey; Alastair Culham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Variation in pelvic shape and size in Eastern European males: a computed tomography comparative study.

Authors:  Bartosz Musielak; Anna Maria Kubicka; Michał Rychlik; Jarosław Czubak; Adam Czwojdziński; Andrzej Grzegorzewski; Marek Jóźwiak
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Three-dimensional geometric morphometric sex determination of the whole and modeled fragmentary human pubic bone.

Authors:  Katherine Baca; Brandon Bridge; Meradeth Snow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.