Literature DB >> 24114403

Bird community responses to the edge between suburbs and reserves.

Karen Ikin1, Philip S Barton, Emma Knight, David B Lindenmayer, Joern Fischer, Adrian D Manning.   

Abstract

New insights into community-level responses at the urban fringe, and the mechanisms underlying them, are needed. In our study, we investigated the compositional distinctiveness and variability of a breeding bird community at both sides of established edges between suburban residential areas and woodland reserves in Canberra, Australia. Our goals were to determine if: (1) community-level responses were direct (differed with distance from the edge, independent of vegetation) or indirect (differed in response to edge-related changes in vegetation), and (2) if guild-level responses provided the mechanism underpinning community-level responses. We found that suburbs and reserves supported significantly distinct bird communities. The suburban bird community, characterised by urban-adapted native and exotic species, had a weak direct edge response, with decreasing compositional variability with distance from the edge. In comparison, the reserve bird community, characterised by woodland-dependent species, was related to local tree and shrub cover. This was not an indirect response, however, as tree and shrub cover was not related to edge distance. We found that the relative richness of nesting, foraging and body size guilds also displayed similar edge responses, indicating that they underpinned the observed community-level responses. Our study illustrates how community-level responses provide valuable insights into how communities respond to differences in resources between two contrasting habitats. Further, the effects of the suburban matrix penetrate into reserves for greater distances than previously thought. Suburbs and adjacent reserves, however, provided important habitat resources for many native species and the conservation of these areas should not be discounted from continued management strategies.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24114403     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-013-2793-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biotic homogenization.

Authors:  Julian D Olden; N Leroy Poff; Marlis R Douglas; Michael E Douglas; Kurt D Fausch
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity.

Authors:  Marti J Anderson; Kari E Ellingsen; Brian H McArdle
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  Functional homogenization effect of urbanization on bird communities.

Authors:  Vincent Devictor; Romain Julliard; Denis Couvet; Alexandre Lee; Frédéric Jiguet
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  Butterfly edge effects are predicted by a simple model in a complex landscape.

Authors:  Leslie Ries; Thomas D Sisk
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Pervasive impact of large-scale edge effects on a beetle community.

Authors:  Robert M Ewers; Raphael K Didham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Conservation in the city.

Authors:  Eric W Sanderson; Amanda Huron
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.560

Review 7.  Global consequences of land use.

Authors:  Jonathan A Foley; Ruth Defries; Gregory P Asner; Carol Barford; Gordon Bonan; Stephen R Carpenter; F Stuart Chapin; Michael T Coe; Gretchen C Daily; Holly K Gibbs; Joseph H Helkowski; Tracey Holloway; Erica A Howard; Christopher J Kucharik; Chad Monfreda; Jonathan A Patz; I Colin Prentice; Navin Ramankutty; Peter K Snyder
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The paradox of invasion in birds: competitive superiority or ecological opportunism?

Authors:  Daniel Sol; Ignasi Bartomeus; Andrea S Griffin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-12-04       Impact factor: 3.225

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Anthropogenic impacts in protected areas: assessing the efficiency of conservation efforts using Mediterranean ant communities.

Authors:  Elena Angulo; Raphaël Boulay; Francisca Ruano; Alberto Tinaut; Xim Cerdá
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Urbanization impacts on mammals across urban-forest edges and a predictive model of edge effects.

Authors:  Nélida R Villaseñor; Don A Driscoll; Martín A H Escobar; Philip Gibbons; David B Lindenmayer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.