PURPOSE: We performed a UGT1A1 genotype-guided study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and evaluate the toxicities and pharmacokinetics of the combination of capecitabine (CAP), oxaliplatin (OX), and irinotecan (IRIN). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients were screened for UGT1A1 *28 genotype prior to treatment. The starting dose (mg/m(2)) was IRIN (150), OX (85) and CAP (400), days 2-15. Doses were escalated or de-escalated within each genotype group (*28/*28, *1/*28 and *1/*1). IRIN pharmacokinetics was performed at the MTD. RESULTS: 50 patients were evaluable for toxicity [11 (*28/*28); 18 (*1/*28); 21 (*1/*1)]. UGT1A1 *28/*28 patients experienced hematologic dose limiting toxicity (DLT), requiring dose-de-escalation. The UGT1A1 *28/*28 recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was IRIN (75), OX (85), and CAP (400). In contrast, both UGT1A1 *1/*28 and *1/*1 tolerated higher doses of IRIN and non-hematologic toxicity was dose limiting for UGT1A1 *1/*1. The RP2D was IRIN (150), OX (85), and CAP (400) for UGT1A1*1/*28 and IRIN (150), OX (100), and CAP (1600) for UGT1A1 *1/*1. UGT1A1 *1/*28 and *1/*1 patients treated with IRIN (150) had similar AUCs for the active irinotecan metabolite, SN38 (366 +/- 278 and 350 +/- 159 ng/ml*hr, respectively). UGT1A1 *28/*28 patients (n = 3) treated with a lower IRIN dose (100) had non-significantly higher mean SN38 exposures (604 +/- 289 ng/ml*hr, p = 0.14). Antitumor activity was observed in all genotype groups. CONCLUSIONS: UGT1A1 genotype affects the dose and pharmacokinetics of the CAPIRINOX regimen and UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of CAPIRINOX is ongoing in a phase II study of small bowel cancer (NCT00433550).
PURPOSE: We performed a UGT1A1 genotype-guided study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and evaluate the toxicities and pharmacokinetics of the combination of capecitabine (CAP), oxaliplatin (OX), and irinotecan (IRIN). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Patients were screened for UGT1A1 *28 genotype prior to treatment. The starting dose (mg/m(2)) was IRIN (150), OX (85) and CAP (400), days 2-15. Doses were escalated or de-escalated within each genotype group (*28/*28, *1/*28 and *1/*1). IRIN pharmacokinetics was performed at the MTD. RESULTS: 50 patients were evaluable for toxicity [11 (*28/*28); 18 (*1/*28); 21 (*1/*1)]. UGT1A1 *28/*28 patients experienced hematologic dose limiting toxicity (DLT), requiring dose-de-escalation. The UGT1A1 *28/*28 recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was IRIN (75), OX (85), and CAP (400). In contrast, both UGT1A1 *1/*28 and *1/*1 tolerated higher doses of IRIN and non-hematologic toxicity was dose limiting for UGT1A1 *1/*1. The RP2D was IRIN (150), OX (85), and CAP (400) for UGT1A1*1/*28 and IRIN (150), OX (100), and CAP (1600) for UGT1A1 *1/*1. UGT1A1 *1/*28 and *1/*1 patients treated with IRIN (150) had similar AUCs for the active irinotecan metabolite, SN38 (366 +/- 278 and 350 +/- 159 ng/ml*hr, respectively). UGT1A1 *28/*28 patients (n = 3) treated with a lower IRIN dose (100) had non-significantly higher mean SN38 exposures (604 +/- 289 ng/ml*hr, p = 0.14). Antitumor activity was observed in all genotype groups. CONCLUSIONS:UGT1A1 genotype affects the dose and pharmacokinetics of the CAPIRINOX regimen and UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of CAPIRINOX is ongoing in a phase II study of small bowel cancer (NCT00433550).
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: L Iyer; C D King; P F Whitington; M D Green; S K Roy; T R Tephly; B L Coffman; M J Ratain Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1998-02-15 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: M Zeuli; E Di Costanzo; A Sdrobolini; S Gasperoni; F P Paoloni; A Carpi; L Moscetti; R Cherubini; F Cognetti Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Matthew P Goetz; Charles Erlichman; Anthony J Windebank; Joel M Reid; Jeffrey A Sloan; Pamela Atherton; Alex A Adjei; Joseph Rubin; Henry Pitot; Evanthia Galanis; Matthew M Ames; Richard M Goldberg Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-09-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: K Akaba; T Kimura; A Sasaki; S Tanabe; T Ikegami; M Hashimoto; H Umeda; H Yoshida; K Umetsu; H Chiba; I Yuasa; K Hayasaka Journal: Biochem Mol Biol Int Date: 1998-09
Authors: Robert R McWilliams; Nathan R Foster; Michelle R Mahoney; Thomas C Smyrk; Joseph A Murray; Matthew M Ames; L Elise Horvath; Daniel J Schneider; Timothy J Hobday; Aminah Jatoi; Jeffrey P Meyers; Matthew P Goetz Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Steven G DuBois; Yael P Mosse; Elizabeth Fox; Rachel A Kudgus; Joel M Reid; Renee McGovern; Susan Groshen; Rochelle Bagatell; John M Maris; Clare J Twist; Kelly Goldsmith; M Meaghan Granger; Brian Weiss; Julie R Park; Margaret E Macy; Susan L Cohn; Greg Yanik; Lars M Wagner; Randall Hawkins; Jesse Courtier; Hollie Lai; Fariba Goodarzian; Hiroyuki Shimada; Najee Boucher; Scarlett Czarnecki; Chunqiao Luo; Denice Tsao-Wei; Katherine K Matthay; Araz Marachelian Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-08-09 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Paolo Tarantino; Dario Trapani; Stefania Morganti; Emanuela Ferraro; Giulia Viale; Paolo D'Amico; Bruno Achutti Duso; Giuseppe Curigliano Journal: Cancer Drug Resist Date: 2019-03-19
Authors: Steven G DuBois; Araz Marachelian; Elizabeth Fox; Rachel A Kudgus; Joel M Reid; Susan Groshen; Jemily Malvar; Rochelle Bagatell; Lars Wagner; John M Maris; Randall Hawkins; Jesse Courtier; Hollie Lai; Fariba Goodarzian; Hiroyuki Shimada; Scarlett Czarnecki; Denice Tsao-Wei; Katherine K Matthay; Yael P Mosse Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-02-16 Impact factor: 44.544