BACKGROUND: A phase I study to assess the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), pharmacokinetics (PK) and antitumor activity of vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: Patients received vorinostat orally once daily on days 1-14 and bortezomib intravenously on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 21-day cycle. Starting dose (level 1) was vorinostat (400 mg) and bortezomib (0.7 mg/m(2)). Bortezomib dosing was increased using a standard phase I dose-escalation schema. PKs were evaluated during cycle 1. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients received 57 cycles of treatment on four dose levels ranging from bortezomib 0.7 mg/m(2) to 1.5 mg/m(2). The MTD was established at vorinostat 400 mg daily and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2). DLTs consisted of grade 3 fatigue in three patients (1 mg/m(2),1.3 mg/m(2) and 1.5 mg/m(2)) and grade 3 hyponatremia in one patient (1.5 mg/m(2)). The most common grade 1/2 toxicities included nausea (60.9%), fatigue (34.8%), diaphoresis (34.8%), anorexia (30.4%) and constipation (26.1%). Objective partial responses were observed in one patient with NSCLC and in one patient with treatment-refractory soft tissue sarcoma. Bortezomib did not affect the PKs of vorinostat; however, the Cmax and AUC of the acid metabolite were significantly increased on day 2 compared with day 1. CONCLUSIONS: This combination was generally well-tolerated at doses that achieved clinical benefit. The MTD was established at vorinostat 400 mg daily × 14 days and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 21-day cycle.
BACKGROUND: A phase I study to assess the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), pharmacokinetics (PK) and antitumor activity of vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS:Patients received vorinostat orally once daily on days 1-14 and bortezomib intravenously on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 21-day cycle. Starting dose (level 1) was vorinostat (400 mg) and bortezomib (0.7 mg/m(2)). Bortezomib dosing was increased using a standard phase I dose-escalation schema. PKs were evaluated during cycle 1. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients received 57 cycles of treatment on four dose levels ranging from bortezomib 0.7 mg/m(2) to 1.5 mg/m(2). The MTD was established at vorinostat 400 mg daily and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2). DLTs consisted of grade 3 fatigue in three patients (1 mg/m(2),1.3 mg/m(2) and 1.5 mg/m(2)) and grade 3 hyponatremia in one patient (1.5 mg/m(2)). The most common grade 1/2 toxicities included nausea (60.9%), fatigue (34.8%), diaphoresis (34.8%), anorexia (30.4%) and constipation (26.1%). Objective partial responses were observed in one patient with NSCLC and in one patient with treatment-refractory soft tissue sarcoma. Bortezomib did not affect the PKs of vorinostat; however, the Cmax and AUC of the acid metabolite were significantly increased on day 2 compared with day 1. CONCLUSIONS: This combination was generally well-tolerated at doses that achieved clinical benefit. The MTD was established at vorinostat 400 mg daily × 14 days and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 21-day cycle.
Authors: Robert G Maki; Andrew S Kraft; Kelly Scheu; Jennifer Yamada; Scott Wadler; Cristina R Antonescu; John J Wright; Gary K Schwartz Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-04-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Nicholas Mitsiades; Constantine S Mitsiades; Paul G Richardson; Ciaran McMullan; Vassiliki Poulaki; Galinos Fanourakis; Robert Schlossman; Dharminder Chauhan; Nikhil C Munshi; Teru Hideshima; Victoria M Richon; Paul A Marks; Kenneth C Anderson Journal: Blood Date: 2003-01-16 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Constantine S Mitsiades; Nicholas S Mitsiades; Ciaran J McMullan; Vassiliki Poulaki; Reshma Shringarpure; Teru Hideshima; Masaharu Akiyama; Dharminder Chauhan; Nikhil Munshi; Xuesong Gu; Charles Bailey; Marie Joseph; Towia A Libermann; Victoria M Richon; Paul A Marks; Kenneth C Anderson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-12-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Melissa J Peart; Kellie M Tainton; Astrid A Ruefli; Anthony E Dear; Karin A Sedelies; Lorraine A O'Reilly; Nigel J Waterhouse; Joseph A Trapani; Ricky W Johnstone Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-08-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Dustin A Deming; Jacob Ninan; Howard H Bailey; Jill M Kolesar; Jens Eickhoff; Joel M Reid; Matthew M Ames; Renee M McGovern; Dona Alberti; Rebecca Marnocha; Igor Espinoza-Delgado; John Wright; George Wilding; William R Schelman Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Beata Holkova; Maciej Kmieciak; Prithviraj Bose; Victor Y Yazbeck; Paul M Barr; Mary Beth Tombes; Ellen Shrader; Caryn Weir-Wiggins; April D Rollins; Erin M Cebula; Emily Pierce; Megan Herr; Heidi Sankala; Kevin T Hogan; Wen Wan; Changyong Feng; Derick R Peterson; Richard I Fisher; Steven Grant; Jonathan W Friedberg Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2015-10-12
Authors: Ivan Kopljar; David J Gallacher; An De Bondt; Laure Cougnaud; Eddy Vlaminckx; Ilse Van den Wyngaert; Hua Rong Lu Journal: Stem Cells Transl Med Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 6.940