Literature DB >> 24114099

Reliability and validity of the functional analysis screening tool.

Brian A Iwata1, Iser G Deleon, Eileen M Roscoe.   

Abstract

The Functional Analysis Screening Tool (FAST) is a 16-item questionnaire about antecedent and consequent events that might be correlated with the occurrence of problem behavior. Items are organized into 4 functional categories based on contingencies that maintain problem behavior. We assessed interrater reliability of the FAST with 196 problem behaviors through independent administration to pairs of raters (Study 1). Mean item-by-item agreement between pairs of raters was 71.5%. Agreement for individual items ranged from 53.3% to 84.5%. Agreement on FAST outcomes, based on comparison of informants' highest totals, was 64.8%. We assessed the validity of the FAST by comparing its outcomes with results of 69 functional analyses (Study 2). The FAST score predicted the condition of the functional analysis in which the highest rate of problem behavior occurred in 44 cases (63.8%). Potential uses of the FAST in the context of a clinical interview, as well as limitations, are discussed. © Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

Keywords:  assessment; functional analysis; problem behavior; rating scale

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24114099     DOI: 10.1002/jaba.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  20 in total

1.  Functional analysis of problem behavior: A systematic approach for identifying idiosyncratic variables.

Authors:  Eileen M Roscoe; Kevin J Schlichenmeyer; William V Dube
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2015-05-01

2.  A Clinical Demonstration of Correlational and Experimental Analyses of Precursor Behavior.

Authors:  Jonathan D Schmidt; Michael P Kranak; Amanda L Goetzel; Jasmeen Kaur; Griffin W Rooker
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2020-06-22

3.  Problem behaviour in adolescent boys with fragile X syndrome: relative prevalence, frequency and severity.

Authors:  S S Hall; R P Barnett; K M Hustyi
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2016-10-11

4.  The Practical Importance of the Distinction Between Open and Closed-Ended Indirect Assessments.

Authors:  Mitch J Fryling; Natalia A Baires
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2016-02-17

5.  A Preliminary Evaluation of Interrater Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Open-Ended Indirect Assessment.

Authors:  Valdeep Saini; Kelly Ubdegrove; Shany Biran; Rebecca Duncan
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2019-05-28

6.  Blending Stimulus Fading Procedures with Forward Chaining to Address Treatment Resistance in an Adult with an Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  John M Guercio; Robert J Cormier
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2015-05-16

7.  Practice Recommendations for Addressing Problem Behaviors in Siblings with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Joanna E Lomas Mevers; Nathan A Call; Sarah J Miller
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2017-05-17

8.  Reliability and Validity of Indirect Assessment Outcomes: Experts versus Caregivers.

Authors:  Joseph D Dracobly; Claudia L Dozier; Adam M Briggs; Jessica F Juanico
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2017-03-20

9.  Brief Report: Understanding Crisis Behaviors in Hospitalized Psychiatric Patients with Autism Spectrum Disorder--Iceberg Assessment Interview.

Authors:  Kate H Stark; Julia C Barnes; Nicholas D Young; Robin L Gabriels
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-11

10.  A statewide survey assessing practitioners' use and perceived utility of functional assessment.

Authors:  Eileen M Roscoe; Katurri M Phillips; Maureen A Kelly; Rachel Farber; William V Dube
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2015-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.