Literature DB >> 24113922

Analysis of postoperative bleeding and risk factors in transoral surgery of the oropharynx.

Taylor R Pollei1, Michael L Hinni, Eric J Moore, Richard E Hayden, Kerry D Olsen, John D Casler, Logan C Walter.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: With an increasing incidence of oropharyngeal carcinoma and prevalence of transoral surgical techniques, postoperative bleeding, with its associated risk factors, deserves evaluation.
OBJECTIVE: To classify and review postoropharyngectomy hemorrhage rates and associated risk factors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Single-institution, multicenter retrospective medical chart review analyzing surgical procedures in 906 patients treated with transoral surgery for oropharyngeal carcinoma at a tertiary care, academic referral center from 1994 to 2012. Tumor stage, previous treatment, resection method, and transcervical external carotid branch ligation were analyzed in relationship to postoperative hemorrhage rate, and severity. A novel classification system was created, grading bleeding episodes as minor, intermediate, major, or severe based on management method and related sequelae.
RESULTS: Postoperative bleeding occurred in 5.4% of patients (49 of 906) with 67.3% of these (33 of 49) requiring operative intervention. Severe bleeding episodes were very rare (1.1% of patients). Transcervical external carotid system vessel ligation was performed with the primary resection in 15.6% of patients with no overall difference in bleeding rate or severity of bleeding in patients who underwent ligation vs those who did not (P = .21 and P = .66, respectively). Vessel ligation was performed more frequently in patients with a higher T stage (P = .002). In previously treated patients, severity of bleeding was decreased if vessels were ligated (P > .05). Higher T-stage tumors had a higher bleeding rate (P = .02). Bleeding rates were similar between those treated with laser (5.6%) and robotic (5.9%) oropharyngectomy (P = .80); however, patients with significantly higher T-stage tumors were treated with laser vs robot techniques (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Transoral resection of oropharyngeal carcinoma is safe, and severe life-threatening hemorrhage is rare. Although transcervical vessel ligation did not result in an overall decrease in bleeding rate, there is a trend toward reduced postoropharyngectomy bleeding severity with ligation. We recommend ligation for higher T-stage tumors, primary tonsil tumors, and patients undergoing revision surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24113922     DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.5097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  20 in total

1.  Evaluating the risks and benefits of ketorolac in transoral robotic surgery.

Authors:  Morgan M Sandelski; Sarah M Drejet; David Zimmer; Jessica A Yesensky; Michael Moore; Avinash V Mantravadi; Michael W Sim
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-01-16

Review 2.  The role of transoral robotic surgery in the management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a current review.

Authors:  E Ritter Sansoni; Neil D Gross
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Perioperative safety, feasibility, and oncologic utility of transoral robotic surgery with da Vinci Xi platform.

Authors:  Fanny Gabrysz-Forget; Taha Mur; Robert Dolan; Bharat Yarlagadda
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-03-01

4.  Postoperative hemorrhage and hospital revisit after transoral robotic surgery.

Authors:  Joseph Zenga; Jasmina Suko; Dorina Kallogjeri; Patrik Pipkorn; Brian Nussenbaum; Ryan S Jackson
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  How we improve the transoral resection for oral and oropharyngeal cancer: the CO2 waveguide laser.

Authors:  G Tirelli; F Boscolo Nata; R Bussani; A Gatto; E Quatela; S Rigo; M Piovesana
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Complications following transoral robotic surgery (TORS): A detailed institutional review of complications.

Authors:  Ashley Hay; Jocelyn Migliacci; Daniella Karassawa Zanoni; Jay O Boyle; Bhuvanesh Singh; Richard J Wong; Snehal G Patel; Ian Ganly
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 5.337

7.  Effect of transcervical arterial ligation on the severity of postoperative hemorrhage after transoral robotic surgery.

Authors:  Mark Kubik; Rajarsi Mandal; William Albergotti; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Robert L Ferris; Seungwon Kim
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  Lateral Oropharyngeal Wall Coverage with Buccinator Myomucosal and Buccal Fat Pad Flaps.

Authors:  Bok Ki Jung; Seung Yong Song; Se-Heon Kim; Young Seok Kim; Won Jai Lee; Jong Won Hong; Tai Suk Roh; Dae Hyun Lew
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-07-14

9.  Haemorrhage following transoral robotic surgery.

Authors:  A Hay; J Migliacci; D Karassawa Zanoni; J O Boyle; B Singh; R J Wong; S G Patel; I Ganly
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 2.597

10.  A novel surgeon credentialing and quality assurance process using transoral surgery for oropharyngeal cancer in ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group Trial E3311.

Authors:  Robert L Ferris; Yael Flamand; F Christopher Holsinger; Gregory S Weinstein; Harry Quon; Ranee Mehra; Joaquin J Garcia; Michael L Hinni; Neil D Gross; Erich M Sturgis; Umamaheswar Duvvuri; Eduardo Méndez; John A Ridge; J Scott Magnuson; Kerry A Higgins; Mihir R Patel; Russel B Smith; Daniel W Karakla; Michael E Kupferman; James P Malone; Benjamin L Judson; Jeremy Richmon; Jay O Boyle; Rodrigo Bayon; Bert W O'Malley; Enver Ozer; Giovana R Thomas; Wayne M Koch; R Bryan Bell; Nabil F Saba; Shuli Li; Elin R Sigurdson; Barbara Burtness
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 5.337

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.