Literature DB >> 24113831

Jack-of-all-trades master of all? Snake vertebrae have a generalist inner organization.

Alexandra Houssaye1, Renaud Boistel, Wolfgang Böhme, Anthony Herrel.   

Abstract

Snakes are a very speciose group of squamates that adapted to various habitats and ecological niches. Their ecological diversity is of particular interest and functional demands associated with their various styles of locomotion are expected to result in anatomical specializations. In order to explore the potential adaptation of snakes to their environment we here analyze variation in vertebral structure at the microanatomical level in species with different locomotor adaptations. Vertebrae, being a major element of the snake body, are expected to display adaptations to the physical constraints associated with the different locomotor modes and environments. Our results revealed a rather homogenous vertebral microanatomy in contrast to what has been observed for other squamates and amniotes more generally. We here suggest that the near-absence of microanatomical specializations in snake vertebrae might be correlated to their rather homogeneous overall morphology and reduced range of morphological diversity, as compared to lizards. Thus, snakes appear to retain a generalist inner morphology that allows them to move efficiently in different environments. Only a few ecologically highly specialized taxa appear to display some microanatomical specializations that remain to be studied in greater detail.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24113831     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-013-1102-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  20 in total

1.  Developmental basis of limblessness and axial patterning in snakes.

Authors:  M J Cohn; C Tickle
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-06-03       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Pattern and process in constructional morphology.

Authors:  Jorge Cubo
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.930

3.  A comment on phylogenetic correction.

Authors:  F James Rohlf
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Marine invasions by non-sea snakes, with thoughts on terrestrial-aquatic-marine transitions.

Authors:  John C Murphy
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.326

Review 5.  Three rules for bone adaptation to mechanical stimuli.

Authors:  C H Turner
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 6.  "Pachyostosis" in aquatic amniotes: a review.

Authors:  Alexandra Houssaye
Journal:  Integr Zool       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.654

7.  Testing an inference of function from structure: snake vertebrae do the twist.

Authors:  B R Moon
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.804

Review 8.  Snake phylogeny based on osteology, soft anatomy and ecology.

Authors:  Michael S Y Lee; John D Scanlon
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2002-08

9.  Micromechanical analyses of vertebral trabecular bone based on individual trabeculae segmentation of plates and rods.

Authors:  X Sherry Liu; Grant Bevill; Tony M Keaveny; Paul Sajda; X Edward Guo
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Inner architecture of vertebral centra in terrestrial and aquatic mammals: a two-dimensional comparative study.

Authors:  Maitena Dumont; Michel Laurin; Florian Jacques; Eric Pellé; Willy Dabin; Vivian de Buffrénil
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 1.804

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Form and function remixed: developmental physiology in the evolution of vertebrate body plans.

Authors:  Stuart A Newman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Comparative morphology of snake (Squamata) endocasts: evidence of phylogenetic and ecological signals.

Authors:  Rémi Allemand; Renaud Boistel; Gheylen Daghfous; Zoé Blanchet; Raphaël Cornette; Nathalie Bardet; Peggy Vincent; Alexandra Houssaye
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Differing effects of size and lifestyle on bone structure in mammals.

Authors:  Eli Amson; Faysal Bibi
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 7.431

4.  Molecular Footprints of Aquatic Adaptation Including Bone Mass Changes in Cetaceans.

Authors:  Xuming Zhou; Di Sun; Xuanmin Guang; Siming Ma; Xiaodong Fang; Marco Mariotti; Rasmus Nielsen; Vadim N Gladyshev; Guang Yang
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.416

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.