Literature DB >> 24113504

Prospective clinical trial on dosage optimizing of tranexamic acid in non-emergency cardiac surgery procedures.

T Waldow1, M Szlapka1, M Haferkorn1, L Bürger1, K Plötze1, K Matschke1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: After withdrawal of aprotinin in 2008 only tranexamic acid (TxA, Cyclocapron, Pfitzer, Germany) remains available as antihyperfibrinolytic agent in Europe. Dosage (from 1 g to 20 g) and application strategy (single shot i.v., infusion i.v., topical) reflect an indiscriminate use of TXA in cardiac surgery. We use data analysis of three registries to evaluate safety issues and sufficiency of different TxA dosages in our center.
METHODS: Registry 1: Single shot ultra-low dose TxA (1 g in priming volume). Registry 2: Single shot medium dose TxA (5 g in priming volume). Registry 3: Single shot medium dose TxA (3 g in priming volume) and continuous, weight-adapted administration during cross clamping. Independence of surgeon's preference was achieved by changing dosage every surgery day regardless of operation schedule.
RESULTS: Data analysis was carried out on 1182 consecutive, elective patients (1 g TxA n = 415; 3 g + x g TA n = 367; mean TxA dose 4.4 g ± 1.0 g; 5 g TxA n = 400). Patient characteristics were well matched in all three registries (mean age: 69 ± 9.5y, BMI 28.2 ± 4.7, Creatinin 107.5 ± 52.8 μM), as were performed surgical procedures (excluding organ transplantation). Postoperative data showed no significant differences for blood loss and major adverse events (1 g vs. 3 + g vs. 5 g: blood loss: 894 ± 1479 vs. 903 ± 1282 vs. 1004 ± 1604 ml; stroke: 1.5 vs. 1.6 vs. 1.5%; myocardial infarction 2.7 vs. 3.3 vs. 1.3%; 30d mortality 3.9 vs. 4.2 vs. 4.8%, respectively). Secondary endpoints (de novo dialysis, transfusion requirement, ICU and total treatment time) showed no significant differences between registries.
CONCLUSION: Use of 1 g TxA is safe and sufficient for elective patients with on pump cardiac surgery and thus has been established as strategy of choice in our center.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24113504     DOI: 10.3233/CH-131782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Hemorheol Microcirc        ISSN: 1386-0291            Impact factor:   2.375


  5 in total

1.  Effect of High- vs Low-Dose Tranexamic Acid Infusion on Need for Red Blood Cell Transfusion and Adverse Events in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: The OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jia Shi; Chenghui Zhou; Wei Pan; Hansong Sun; Sheng Liu; Wei Feng; Weijian Wang; Zhaoyun Cheng; Yang Wang; Zhe Zheng
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 157.335

2.  A comparison of high-dose and low-dose tranexamic acid antifibrinolytic protocols for primary coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Stephen M McHugh; Lavinia Kolarczyk; Robert S Lang; Lawrence M Wei; Marquez Jose; Kathirvel Subramaniam
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2016-02

3.  Tranexamic acid in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis (protocol).

Authors:  Thamer Alaifan; Ahmed Alenazy; Dominic Xiang Wang; Shannon M Fernando; Jessica Spence; Emilie Belley-Cote; Alison Fox-Robichaud; Craig Ainswoth; Tim Karachi; Kwadwo Kyeremanteng; Ryan Zarychanski; Richard Whitlock; Bram Rochwerg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Different dose regimes and administration methods of tranexamic acid in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Jingfei Guo; Xurong Gao; Yan Ma; Huran Lv; Wenjun Hu; Shijie Zhang; Hongwen Ji; Guyan Wang; Jia Shi
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  High-Dose Tranexamic Acid in Patients Underwent Surgical Repair of Aortic Dissection Might Reduce Postoperative Blood Loss: A Cohort Analysis.

Authors:  Jingfei Guo; Liang Cao; Hongbai Wang; Guangyu Liu; Yong Zhou; Lijing Yang; Yuan Jia; Su Yuan
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.