Literature DB >> 24113488

Innovation in healthcare. The challenge for laboratory medicine.

Christopher P Price1, Andrew St John.   

Abstract

The delivery of healthcare is the product of a complex organization and it is not entirely surprising that innovation is not always considered to deliver on the expectations generated by invention. As policymakers and payers seek to improve the quality and value-for-money of healthcare, more attention is being directed at the barriers to innovation, and the challenges of translating inventions into outcomes. Laboratory medicine is one facet of healthcare that has generated considerable levels of invention but, while showing increasing volumes of activity over the past decades, it has not been recognized for generating the benefit in outcomes that might have been expected. One of the major reasons for this position has been the poor quality of evidence available to demonstrate the impact of laboratory investigations on health outcomes. Consequently an absence of evidence stifles the opportunity to develop the business case that demonstrates the link between test result and improved outcome. This has a major influence on the success of innovation in laboratory medicine. This review explores the process of innovation applied to laboratory medicine and offers an insight into how the impact of laboratory medicine on health outcomes can be improved.
© 2013.

Keywords:  Evidence-based practice; Health outcomes; Innovation; Invention; Laboratory medicine

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24113488     DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.09.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chim Acta        ISSN: 0009-8981            Impact factor:   3.786


  5 in total

1.  The march of technology through the clinical laboratory and beyond.

Authors:  Andrew St John; Christopher Price
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2014-08

2.  Molecular chlamydia and gonorrhoea point of care tests implemented into routine practice: Systematic review and value proposition development.

Authors:  Sebastian S Fuller; Eleanor Clarke; Emma M Harding-Esch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Assessing E-Health adoption readiness using diffusion of innovation theory and the role mediated by each adopter's category in a Mauritian context.

Authors:  Manish Putteeraj; Nandhini Bhungee; Jhoti Somanah; Numrata Moty
Journal:  Int Health       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 3.131

4.  Academic Pathology: A New Journal.

Authors:  James M Crawford
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2014-11-25

5.  Improving American Healthcare Through "Clinical Lab 2.0": A Project Santa Fe Report.

Authors:  James M Crawford; Khosrow Shotorbani; Gaurav Sharma; Michael Crossey; Tarush Kothari; Thomas S Lorey; Jeffrey W Prichard; Myra Wilkerson; Nancy Fisher
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2017-04-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.