BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Workup of incidental thyroid nodules detected on CT imaging could be contributing to the increased diagnosis of small thyroid cancers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate recent trends in the incidence of thyroid cancer, and to determine the relationship between annual CT imaging volume and rate of thyroid cancer diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data bases for thyroid cancer and CT imaging volume. Thyroid cancer data from 1983-2009 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data base. National Council of Radiation Protection and Measurements Report No. 160 provided data on hospital and nonhospital CT imaging volume for 1993-2006. Trends in thyroid cancer were modeled for overall incidence on the basis of patient age, tumor histologic features, and tumor size and stage. Linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the strength of the relationship between annual CT scan volume and the incidence of thyroid cancer by tumor size and histologic type. RESULTS: In 2009, the incidence of thyroid cancer was 14 per 100,000, which represented a 1.9-fold increase compared with 2000. The growth in incidence was exponential compared with a minimal linear increase in thyroid cancer mortality rate. The subgroup with the greatest change was subcentimeter papillary carcinoma, with doubling in incidence approximately every 6.2 years. The linear relationship between annual CT scan volume and the incidence of subcentimeter papillary carcinoma was very strong (R(2) = 0.98; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of subcentimeter papillary carcinoma is growing at an exponential rate without significant change in mortality rate. The strong linear relationship between new cases of subcentimeter papillary carcinomas and the number of CT scans per year suggests that an increase in CT scans may increase the detection of incidental thyroid cancers.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Workup of incidental thyroid nodules detected on CT imaging could be contributing to the increased diagnosis of small thyroid cancers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate recent trends in the incidence of thyroid cancer, and to determine the relationship between annual CT imaging volume and rate of thyroid cancer diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data bases for thyroid cancer and CT imaging volume. Thyroid cancer data from 1983-2009 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data base. National Council of Radiation Protection and Measurements Report No. 160 provided data on hospital and nonhospital CT imaging volume for 1993-2006. Trends in thyroid cancer were modeled for overall incidence on the basis of patient age, tumor histologic features, and tumor size and stage. Linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the strength of the relationship between annual CT scan volume and the incidence of thyroid cancer by tumor size and histologic type. RESULTS: In 2009, the incidence of thyroid cancer was 14 per 100,000, which represented a 1.9-fold increase compared with 2000. The growth in incidence was exponential compared with a minimal linear increase in thyroid cancer mortality rate. The subgroup with the greatest change was subcentimeter papillary carcinoma, with doubling in incidence approximately every 6.2 years. The linear relationship between annual CT scan volume and the incidence of subcentimeter papillary carcinoma was very strong (R(2) = 0.98; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of subcentimeter papillary carcinoma is growing at an exponential rate without significant change in mortality rate. The strong linear relationship between new cases of subcentimeter papillary carcinomas and the number of CT scans per year suggests that an increase in CT scans may increase the detection of incidental thyroid cancers.
Authors: Vijay M Rao; David C Levin; Laurence Parker; Andrea J Frangos; Jonathan H Sunshine Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Mary C Frates; Carol B Benson; J William Charboneau; Edmund S Cibas; Orlo H Clark; Beverly G Coleman; John J Cronan; Peter M Doubilet; Douglas B Evans; John R Goellner; Ian D Hay; Barbara S Hertzberg; Charles M Intenzo; R Brooke Jeffrey; Jill E Langer; P Reed Larsen; Susan J Mandel; William D Middleton; Carl C Reading; Steven I Sherman; Franklin N Tessler Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Sanjay K Shetty; Michael M Maher; Peter F Hahn; Elkan F Halpern; Suzanne L Aquino Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Hasan A Hobbs; Manisha Bahl; Rendon C Nelson; Peter G Kranz; Ramon M Esclamado; Nathan M Wnuk; Jenny K Hoang Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Leandro Luongo de Matos; Adriana Braz Del Giglio; Carolina Ogawa Matsubayashi; Michelle de Lima Farah; Auro Del Giglio; Maria Aparecida da Silva Pinhal Journal: Diagn Pathol Date: 2012-08-13 Impact factor: 2.644
Authors: Abhineet Uppal; Michael G White; Sapna Nagar; Briseis Aschebrook-Kilfoy; Paul J Chang; Peter Angelos; Edwin L Kaplan; Raymon H Grogan Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Manisha Bahl; Julie A Sosa; Rendon C Nelson; Ramon M Esclamado; Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; Jenny K Hoang Journal: World J Surg Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Hilary L Colbeth; Natalia Genere; Charles B Hall; Nadia Jaber; Juan P Brito; Omar M El Kawkgi; David G Goldfarb; Mayris P Webber; Theresa M Schwartz; David J Prezant; Rachel Zeig-Owens Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Jonathan C L Rodrigues; Stephen M Lyen; William Loughborough; Antonio Matteo Amadu; Anna Baritussio; Amardeep Ghosh Dastidar; Nathan E Manghat; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 5.364