Literature DB >> 24113268

Threat and error management for anesthesiologists: a predictive risk taxonomy.

Keith J Ruskin1, Marjorie P Stiegler, Kellie Park, Patrick Guffey, Viji Kurup, Thomas Chidester.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patient care in the operating room is a dynamic interaction that requires cooperation among team members and reliance upon sophisticated technology. Most human factors research in medicine has been focused on analyzing errors and implementing system-wide changes to prevent them from recurring. We describe a set of techniques that has been used successfully by the aviation industry to analyze errors and adverse events and explain how these techniques can be applied to patient care. RECENT
FINDINGS: Threat and error management (TEM) describes adverse events in terms of risks or challenges that are present in an operational environment (threats) and the actions of specific personnel that potentiate or exacerbate those threats (errors). TEM is a technique widely used in aviation, and can be adapted for the use in a medical setting to predict high-risk situations and prevent errors in the perioperative period. A threat taxonomy is a novel way of classifying and predicting the hazards that can occur in the operating room. TEM can be used to identify error-producing situations, analyze adverse events, and design training scenarios.
SUMMARY: TEM offers a multifaceted strategy for identifying hazards, reducing errors, and training physicians. A threat taxonomy may improve analysis of critical events with subsequent development of specific interventions, and may also serve as a framework for training programs in risk mitigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24113268      PMCID: PMC4301728          DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0952-7907            Impact factor:   2.706


  9 in total

1.  On error management: lessons from aviation.

Authors:  R L Helmreich
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-18

Review 2.  Reducing medical errors and adverse events.

Authors:  Julius Cuong Pham; Monica S Aswani; Michael Rosen; HeeWon Lee; Matthew Huddle; Kristina Weeks; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 13.739

3.  Crisis resource management and teamwork training in anaesthesia.

Authors:  D M Gaba
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Understanding diagnostic errors in medicine: a lesson from aviation.

Authors:  H Singh; L A Petersen; E J Thomas
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-06

5.  Hangar talk survey: using stories as a naturalistic method of informing threat and error management training.

Authors:  Suzanne K Kearns; Jennifer E Sutton
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  Striving for a zero-error patient surgical journey through adoption of aviation-style challenge and response flow checklists: a quality improvement project.

Authors:  Daniel K Low; Mark A Reed; Jeremy M Geiduschek; Lynn D Martin
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.556

7.  Human factors in anaesthetic practice: insights from a task analysis.

Authors:  D Phipps; G H Meakin; P C W Beatty; C Nsoedo; D Parker
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  The Human Factors Analysis Classification System (HFACS) applied to health care.

Authors:  Thomas Diller; George Helmrich; Sharon Dunning; Stephanie Cox; April Buchanan; Scott Shappell
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 9.  Review article: improving drug safety for patients undergoing anesthesia and surgery.

Authors:  Beverley A Orser; Sylvia Hyland; David U; Ian Sheppard; C Ruth Wilson
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 5.063

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.