Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 How can we improve surgical research and innovation?: the IDEAL framework for action.

Literature DB >> 24113195

How can we improve surgical research and innovation?: the IDEAL framework for action.

Allison Hirst¹, Riaz A Agha, David Rosin, Peter McCulloch.

Abstract

Keywords: Ethics; IDEAL collaboration; Methodology; Reporting quality; Research quality; Surgical research

Mesh：

Year: 2013 PMID： 24113195 DOI： 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.09.016

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Surg ISSN： 1743-9159 Impact factor: 6.071

Keyword Cloud
Cited

× No keyword cloud information.

13 in total

Review 1. Evidence-Based Plastic Surgery: Its Rise, Importance, and a Practical Guide.

Authors: Riaz A Agha; Dennis P Orgill
Journal: Aesthet Surg J Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 4.283

2. Learning Curves of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Introduction of a Standardization.

Authors: F S Wehrtmann; J R de la Garza; K F Kowalewski; M W Schmidt; K Müller; C Tapking; P Probst; M K Diener; L Fischer; B P Müller-Stich; F Nickel
Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 4.129

3. OpenHELP (Heidelberg laparoscopy phantom): development of an open-source surgical evaluation and training tool.

Authors: H G Kenngott; J J Wünscher; M Wagner; A Preukschas; A L Wekerle; P Neher; S Suwelack; S Speidel; F Nickel; D Oladokun; Lorenzo Albala; L Maier-Hein; R Dillmann; H P Meinzer; B P Müller-Stich
Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4. Critical appraisal of literature comparing minimally invasive extraperitoneal and transperitoneal radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors: Panagiotis Kallidonis; Bhavan Prasad Rai; Hasan Qazi; Roman Ganzer; Minh Do; Anja Dietel; Evangelos Liatsikos; Nabi Ghulam; Iason Kyriazis; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
Journal: Arab J Urol Date: 2017-08-31

Review 5. Innovation in neurosurgery: less than IDEAL? A systematic review.

Authors: I S Muskens; S J H Diederen; J T Senders; A H Zamanipoor Najafabadi; W R van Furth; A M May; T R Smith; A L Bredenoord; M L D Broekman
Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2017-08-06 Impact factor: 2.216

6. Development of reporting guidance and core outcome sets for seamless, standardised evaluation of innovative surgical procedures and devices: a study protocol for content generation and a Delphi consensus process (COHESIVE study).

Authors: Kerry Avery; Shelley Potter; Jane Blazeby; Nicholas Wilson; Rhiannon Macefield; Sian Cousins; Barry Main; Natalie S Blencowe; Jesmond Zahra; Daisy Elliott; Robert Hinchliffe
Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-09-12 Impact factor: 2.692

How can we improve surgical research and innovation?: the IDEAL framework for action.

Review 1. Evidence-Based Plastic Surgery: Its Rise, Importance, and a Practical Guide.

2. Learning Curves of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Introduction of a Standardization.

3. OpenHELP (Heidelberg laparoscopy phantom): development of an open-source surgical evaluation and training tool.

Review 4. Critical appraisal of literature comparing minimally invasive extraperitoneal and transperitoneal radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Review 5. Innovation in neurosurgery: less than IDEAL? A systematic review.

6. Development of reporting guidance and core outcome sets for seamless, standardised evaluation of innovative surgical procedures and devices: a study protocol for content generation and a Delphi consensus process (COHESIVE study).

7. Conceptualising Surgical Innovation: An Eliminativist Proposal.

8. Advancing research by publishing research protocols and negative studies.

9. A protocol for the development of reporting guidelines for IDEAL stage studies.

Review 10. Surgical innovation: the ethical agenda: A systematic review.