| Literature DB >> 24112819 |
Henrique César Santejo Silveira1, Marina Schmidt-Carrijo, Ervald Henrique Seidel, Cristovam Scapulatempo-Neto, Adhemar Longatto-Filho, Andre Lopes Carvalho, Rui Manuel Vieira Reis, Paulo Hilário Nascimento Saldiva.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To determine the possible genotoxic effect of exposure to the smoke generated by biomass burning on workers involved in manual sugar cane harvesting.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24112819 PMCID: PMC4126064 DOI: 10.1186/1476-069X-12-87
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health ISSN: 1476-069X Impact factor: 5.984
Demographic characteristics of the subjects
| Individuals (N) | 30 | 23 |
| Mean age (± SD*) | 30.50 (5.5) | 31.00 ( 6.7) |
| Work hours, mean (± SD) | 46.33 (8.3) | 51.39 (3.9) |
| N** of Smokers (± SD) | 7 | 5 |
| N** Ex-smokers | 1 | 0 |
| Mean age for beginning cigarette smoking (± DP) | 17.00 (2.0) | 16.40 (2.3) |
| N Risk of inhalation of harmful substances*** (in earlier jobs) | 9 | - |
| N Medication (Current) | 30 | 21 |
| No (%) | 26 (86.7) | 18 (85.8) |
| Yes (%)**** | 4 (13.3) | 3 (14.2) |
| N Diseases related to work | 30 | 23 |
| Yes (%)***** | 1 (3.3) | 1 (4.3) |
| No (%) | 29 (96.7) | 22 (95.7) |
SD* = Standard Deviation; N** = Number of subjects; ***Harmful substances: dust, smoke, gases and chemicals; ****Anti-inflammatory, anti-allergic, anti-muscarinic, antihypertensive and analgesic; *****1 control with wrist synovial tendinitis and 1 sugar cane cutter with muscle aches and cramps.
(−) Not applied to the cutter group.
Comparison of the MN frequencies by Student’s t-test, considering independent groups
| | | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lymphocytes | Control (N = 30) | 1.27 | 1.34 | −6.95 | −8.58 | −5.32 | <0.001 |
| Cutters (N = 23) | 8.22 | 4.18 | |||||
| Buccal cells | Control (N = 27) | 9.70 | 4.76 | −13.05 | −16.33 | −9.76 | <0.001 |
| Cutters (N = 16) | 22.75 | 5.78 | |||||
N number of subjects per group considered in the analysis, SD Standard deviation, DM differences of the mean, considered statistically significant when p <0.05.
Figure 1Graphic representation of distribution of both groups according to their MN frequency. The MN frequency in lymphocytes (light gray) and the MN frequencies of exfoliated buccal cells (dark gray) were considered for this analysis. (°) indicates discrepancy points, bars indicate percentile values, and lines indicate minimum and maximum standard deviations.
Analysis of mean MN frequencies versus MN frequencies of lymphocytes and MN frequencies of buccal cells
| | | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Lymphocytes (N = 27) | 1.11 | 1.28 | −8.59 | 0.89 | −10.43 | −6.75 | <0.001 |
| Buccal cells (N = 27) | 9.70 | 4.76 | ||||||
| Cutters | Lymphocytes (N = 16) | 8.87 | 4.05 | −13.87 | 1.78 | −17.68 | −10.07 | <0.001 |
| Buccal cells (N = 16) | 22.75 | 5.78 | ||||||
N number of subjects per group considered in the analysis, SD Standard Deviation, DM Differences of the mean, considered statistically significant when p < 0.05. We only considered both individuals for which the obtained information was collected in these analyses.
Figure 2Graph representing of the ROC curve. Receiver operating characteristics curves of the MN frequency in lymphocytes (trace) and the MN frequency in cells exfoliated from the mouth (black). Reference line (gray). The proximity of curves to the upper left corner of the most accurate methods was analyzed.