Literature DB >> 24112717

Programming implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with primary prevention indication to prolong time to first shock: results from the PROVIDE study.

Mohammad Saeed1, Ibrahim Hanna, Dionyssios Robotis, Robert Styperek, Leo Polosajian, Ahmed Khan, Joseph Alonso, Yelena Nabutovsky, Curtis Neason.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Shock therapy delivery by implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) can be painful and may have adverse consequences. Reducing shock burden for patients with ICDs would be beneficial.
METHODS: PROVIDE was a prospective, randomized study of primary prevention ICD patients. Patients in the experimental group received a combination of programmed parameters with higher detection rates, longer detection intervals, empiric antitachycardia pacing (ATP), and optimized supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) discriminators, while those in the control group were programmed with conventional parameters. Shock therapy and arrhythmic syncope were compared.
RESULTS: Of 1,670 patients enrolled (846 in the experimental group, 824 in the control group) and monitored over a follow-up of 530 ± 241 days, 202 patients received shock therapy for any cause (82 in the experimental group and 120 in the control group). The median time to first shock was significantly prolonged (13.1 vs 7.8 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47 to 0.82, P = 0.0005) and the 2-year shock rate significantly reduced (12.4% vs 19.4%, P < 0.001) in the experimental group compared to the control group. There was no increase in arrhythmic syncope (HR: 1.64, 95% CI: 0.69 to 3.90, P = 0.26), while the overall mortality was reduced (HR: 0.7, 95% CI: 0.50 to 0.98, P = 0.036) in the experimental group compared to the control group.
CONCLUSION: A combination of programmed parameters utilizing higher detection rate, longer detection intervals, empiric ATP, and optimized SVT discriminators reduced ICD therapies without increasing arrhythmic syncope and was associated with reduction in all-cause mortality among ICD patients.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PROVIDE study; antitachycardia pacing; implantable cardioverter defibrillator; shock reduction; sudden cardiac death; ventricular fibrillation; ventricular tachycardia

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24112717     DOI: 10.1111/jce.12273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  28 in total

Review 1.  Roles and indications for use of implantable defibrillator and resynchronization therapy in the prevention of sudden cardiac death in heart failure.

Authors:  Yitschak Biton; Jayson R Baman; Bronislava Polonsky
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Reduction of inappropriate ICD therapies in patients with primary prevention of sudden cardiac death: DECREASE study.

Authors:  Jörg Otto Schwab; Hendrik Bonnemeier; Thomas Kleemann; Johannes Brachmann; Sven Fischer; Frank Birkenhauer; Frank Eberhardt
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 3.  [Fitness to drive in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices].

Authors:  Dejan Mijic; Bernd Lemke; Harilaos Bogossian
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2019-05-09

4.  Impaired left atrial function predicts inappropriate shocks in primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator candidates.

Authors:  Susumu Tao; Hiroshi Ashikaga; Luisa A Ciuffo; Kihei Yoneyama; Joao A C Lima; Terry F Frank; Robert G Weiss; Gordon F Tomaselli; Katherine C Wu
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-06-22

5.  Reduction of inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies using enhanced supraventricular tachycardia discriminators: the ReduceIT study.

Authors:  Johann Christoph Geller; Armin Wöhrle; Mathias Busch; Albrecht Elsässer; Thomas Kleemann; Frank Birkenhauer; Peter Bramlage; Christian Veltmann
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  [Inappropriate ICD therapies: All problems solved with MADIT-RIT?].

Authors:  Christof Kolb
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2015-04-21

Review 7.  Recommendations for driving after implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation and the use of a wearable cardioverter defibrillator : Different viewpoints around the world.

Authors:  Mona Cooper; Theresa Berent; Johann Auer; Robert Berent
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 8.  Value of The Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator (WCD) as a Bridging-Therapy before Implantation of a Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD).

Authors:  Priv Doz; Johannes Sperzel
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-02-29

9.  For Whom the Bell Tolls : Refining Risk Assessment for Sudden Cardiac Death.

Authors:  Ivaylo Tonchev; David Luria; David Orenstein; Chaim Lotan; Yitschak Biton
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 10.  Optimal tachycardia programming in ICDs : Recommendations in the post-MADIT-RIT era.

Authors:  Carsten W Israel; Tatsiana Burmistrava
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2016-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.