Literature DB >> 24112694

Mitigating the effect of development on bats in England with derogation licensing.

Emma Louise Stone1, Gareth Jones, Stephen Harris.   

Abstract

The Convention on Biological Diversity has catalyzed worldwide awareness of threats to biological diversity and stimulated global conservation strategies. These have led to national and international legislation and have generated debate about the most effective conservation actions. Under the EU Habitats Directive, all member states are obliged to establish a system for strict protection of species listed in Annex IV(a), which includes all bats. In England, this obligation has resulted in legislation that allows for derogation from strict protection under license, provided activities are undertaken to mitigate any potential negative effects on bat numbers. We used an evidence-based approach to assess the cost-effectiveness of mitigation strategies and the English bat-derogation licensing process as a whole. We analyzed data from 389 bat derogation licenses issued in England from 2003 to 2005 relating to 1776 roosts and 15 species to determine the nature and extent of development and mitigation activities and their effects on bats. Overall the effects of licensed activities on roosts were negative. Despite the level of protection afforded to bats, the majority (68%) of roosts for which derogation licenses were issued were destroyed. There were species-specific differences in the probability of roosts being destroyed, and impacts on roosts did not reflect a species' conservation status. Information provided by licensees was inadequate and inconsistent. Most licensees (67%) failed to submit postdevelopment reports, and postdevelopment monitoring was conducted at only 19% of sites. Despite a minimum of £4.13 million spent on mitigation structures for bats from 2003 to 2005, it was unclear whether the licensing process meets EU obligations. On the basis of our results, we believe there is a need to overhaul the licensing process, to establish a comprehensive, standardized postdevelopment monitoring system, and to demonstrate that mitigation is commensurate with Britain's legal obligations. Mitigando el Efecto del Desarrollo sobre los Murciélagos en Inglaterra con Licencias de Derogación.
© 2013 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chiroptera; Directiva de Hábitats; Habitats Directive; conflicto humanos-vida silvestre; conservación basada en la evidencia; conservation policy; evidence-based conservation; human-wildlife conflict; legislación; legislation; licencias de mitigación; mitigation licensing; política de conservación

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24112694     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  2 in total

1.  Effects of hierarchical roost removal on northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis) maternity colonies.

Authors:  Alexander Silvis; W Mark Ford; Eric R Britzke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Managing Conflict between Bats and Humans: The Response of Soprano Pipistrelles (Pipistrellus pygmaeus) to Exclusion from Roosts in Houses.

Authors:  Emma Stone; Matt R K Zeale; Stuart E Newson; William J Browne; Stephen Harris; Gareth Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.