Lindsay Malloch1, Alice Rhoton-Vlasak. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical use and practice attitudes among Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) members regarding the use of letrozole for ovulation induction and infertility treatment. DESIGN: The SART clinic physicians were mailed a cover letter and consent form, a two-page survey, and return envelope. The surveys were returned and analyzed using descriptive statistics. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): None. INTERVENTION(S): A 13-question survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Reproductive endocrinology and infertility physicians use patterns and attitudes regarding letrozole. RESULT(S): A total of 77.9% of physician prescribe letrozole. Of those who do not, 32.4% cited concern about the US Food and Drug Administration warning, 35.1% cited satisfaction with current medications, 25.7% cited both reasons, and 6.8% cited no experience with letrozole. Physicians (11.5%) were unaware of the US Food and Drug Administration warning. Physicians (99.7%) were aware that ovulation induction is an off-label use of letrozole. The most common use was for ovulation induction in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Physicians (14.9%) prescribe letrozole as first-line ovulation therapy prior to clomid, 47.9% use for clomid failures, and 25.7% reported use in both situations. CONCLUSION(S): Most physicians surveyed use letrozole for ovulation induction despite the current US Food and Drug Administration warning. Even when accounting for nonrespondents, more than 25% of physicians indicated success with letrozole use. Questions regarding doses and clinical concerns about letrozole revealed no standardized manner of letrozole administration despite wide interest, therefore additional research is warranted.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical use and practice attitudes among Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) members regarding the use of letrozole for ovulation induction and infertility treatment. DESIGN: The SART clinic physicians were mailed a cover letter and consent form, a two-page survey, and return envelope. The surveys were returned and analyzed using descriptive statistics. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): None. INTERVENTION(S): A 13-question survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Reproductive endocrinology and infertility physicians use patterns and attitudes regarding letrozole. RESULT(S): A total of 77.9% of physician prescribe letrozole. Of those who do not, 32.4% cited concern about the US Food and Drug Administration warning, 35.1% cited satisfaction with current medications, 25.7% cited both reasons, and 6.8% cited no experience with letrozole. Physicians (11.5%) were unaware of the US Food and Drug Administration warning. Physicians (99.7%) were aware that ovulation induction is an off-label use of letrozole. The most common use was for ovulation induction in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Physicians (14.9%) prescribe letrozole as first-line ovulation therapy prior to clomid, 47.9% use for clomid failures, and 25.7% reported use in both situations. CONCLUSION(S): Most physicians surveyed use letrozole for ovulation induction despite the current US Food and Drug Administration warning. Even when accounting for nonrespondents, more than 25% of physicians indicated success with letrozole use. Questions regarding doses and clinical concerns about letrozole revealed no standardized manner of letrozole administration despite wide interest, therefore additional research is warranted.
Authors: Richard S Legro; Robert G Brzyski; Michael P Diamond; Christos Coutifaris; William D Schlaff; Peter Casson; Gregory M Christman; Hao Huang; Qingshang Yan; Ruben Alvero; Daniel J Haisenleder; Kurt T Barnhart; G Wright Bates; Rebecca Usadi; Scott Lucidi; Valerie Baker; J C Trussell; Stephen A Krawetz; Peter Snyder; Dana Ohl; Nanette Santoro; Esther Eisenberg; Heping Zhang Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-07-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Libei Du; Raymond Hang Wun Li; Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson; Yan Hong Du; Li Zhang; Wei Yu Diao; Pak Chung Ho Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-01-31 Impact factor: 2.692