Literature DB >> 24112105

Benefits of investing in ecosystem restoration.

Rudolf S DE Groot1, James Blignaut, Sander VAN DER Ploeg, James Aronson, Thomas Elmqvist, Joshua Farley.   

Abstract

Measures aimed at conservation or restoration of ecosystems are often seen as net-cost projects by governments and businesses because they are based on incomplete and often faulty cost-benefit analyses. After screening over 200 studies, we examined the costs (94 studies) and benefits (225 studies) of ecosystem restoration projects that had sufficient reliable data in 9 different biomes ranging from coral reefs to tropical forests. Costs included capital investment and maintenance of the restoration project, and benefits were based on the monetary value of the total bundle of ecosystem services provided by the restored ecosystem. Assuming restoration is always imperfect and benefits attain only 75% of the maximum value of the reference systems over 20 years, we calculated the net present value at the social discount rates of 2% and 8%. We also conducted 2 threshold cum sensitivity analyses. Benefit-cost ratios ranged from about 0.05:1 (coral reefs and coastal systems, worst-case scenario) to as much as 35:1 (grasslands, best-case scenario). Our results provide only partial estimates of benefits at one point in time and reflect the lower limit of the welfare benefits of ecosystem restoration because both scarcity of and demand for ecosystem services is increasing and new benefits of natural ecosystems and biological diversity are being discovered. Nonetheless, when accounting for even the incomplete range of known benefits through the use of static estimates that fail to capture rising values, the majority of the restoration projects we analyzed provided net benefits and should be considered not only as profitable but also as high-yielding investments. Beneficios de Invertir en la Restauración de Ecosistemas.
© 2013 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  análisis de costo-beneficio; cost-benefit analysis; economic values; ecosystem restoration; restauración de ecosistemas; services; servicios; valores económicos

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24112105     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  15 in total

1.  Are Urban Stream Restoration Plans Worth Implementing?

Authors:  Auri Sarvilinna; Virpi Lehtoranta; Turo Hjerppe
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  How Can We Increase Pro-environmental Behavior During COVID-19 Pandemic? Focusing on the Altruistic (vs. Egoistic) Concerns.

Authors:  Yaeri Kim; Seojin Stacey Lee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-03

3.  Enhancing protection for vulnerable waters.

Authors:  Irena F Creed; Charles R Lane; Jacqueline N Serran; Laurie C Alexander; Nandita B Basu; Aram J K Calhoun; Jay R Christensen; Matthew J Cohen; Christopher Craft; Ellen D'Amico; Edward DeKeyser; Laurie Fowler; Heather E Golden; James W Jawitz; Peter Kalla; L Katherine Kirkman; Megan Lang; Scott G Leibowitz; David B Lewis; John Marton; Daniel L McLaughlin; Hadas Raanan-Kiperwas; Mark C Rains; Kai C Rains; Lora Smith
Journal:  Nat Geosci       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 21.531

4.  More green infrastructure is required to maintain ecosystem services under current trends in land-use change in Europe.

Authors:  Joachim Maes; Ana Barbosa; Claudia Baranzelli; Grazia Zulian; Filipe Batista E Silva; Ine Vandecasteele; Roland Hiederer; Camino Liquete; Maria Luisa Paracchini; Sarah Mubareka; Chris Jacobs-Crisioni; Carolina Perpiña Castillo; Carlo Lavalle
Journal:  Landsc Ecol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.848

5.  Rapid assessment of ecosystem services provided by two mineral extraction sites restored for nature conservation in an agricultural landscape in eastern England.

Authors:  Phillip J Blaen; Li Jia; Kelvin S-H Peh; Rob H Field; Andrew Balmford; Michael A MacDonald; Richard B Bradbury
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Optimal conservation outcomes require both restoration and protection.

Authors:  Hugh P Possingham; Michael Bode; Carissa J Klein
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Restoration and repair of Earth's damaged ecosystems.

Authors:  Holly P Jones; Peter C Jones; Edward B Barbier; Ryan C Blackburn; Jose M Rey Benayas; Karen D Holl; Michelle McCrackin; Paula Meli; Daniel Montoya; David Moreno Mateos
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  An inventory of continental U.S. terrestrial candidate ecological restoration areas based on landscape context.

Authors:  James Wickham; Kurt Riitters; Peter Vogt; Jennifer Costanza; Anne Neale
Journal:  Restor Ecol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.404

9.  Restoration enhances wetland biodiversity and ecosystem service supply, but results are context-dependent: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Paula Meli; José María Rey Benayas; Patricia Balvanera; Miguel Martínez Ramos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Enhanced larval supply and recruitment can replenish reef corals on degraded reefs.

Authors:  Dexter W Dela Cruz; Peter L Harrison
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.