Sheryl R Haut1, Charles B Hall, Thomas Borkowski, Howard Tennen, Richard B Lipton. 1. Montefiore-Einstein Epilepsy Center, Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, U.S.A; Department of Neurology, Montefiore Medical Center and the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, U.S.A.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A subset of patients with epilepsy successfully self-predicted seizures in a paper diary study. We conducted an e-diary study to ensure that prediction precedes seizures, and to characterize the prodromal features and time windows that underlie self-prediction. METHODS: Subjects 18 or older with localization-related epilepsy (LRE) and ≥3 seizures per month maintained an e-diary, reporting a.m./p.m. data daily, including mood, premonitory symptoms, and all seizures. Self-prediction was rated by, "How likely are you to experience a seizure (time frame)?" Five choices ranged from almost certain (>95% chance) to very unlikely. Relative odds of seizure (odds ratio, OR) within time frames was examined using Poisson models with log normal random effects to adjust for multiple observations. KEY FINDINGS: Nineteen subjects reported 244 eligible seizures. OR for prediction choices within 6 h was as high as 9.31 (CI 1.92-45.23) for "almost certain." Prediction was most robust within 6 h of diary entry, and remained significant up to 12 h. For nine best predictors, average sensitivity was 50%. Older age contributed to successful self-prediction, and self-prediction appeared to be driven by mood and premonitory symptoms. In multivariate modeling of seizure occurrence, self-prediction (2.84; CI 1.68-4.81), favorable change in mood (0.82; CI 0.67-0.99), and number of premonitory symptoms (1.11; CI 1.00-1.24) were significant. SIGNIFICANCE: Some persons with epilepsy can self-predict seizures. In these individuals, the odds of a seizure following a positive prediction are high. Predictions were robust, not attributable to recall bias, and were related to self-awareness of mood and premonitory features. The 6-h prediction window is suitable for the development of preemptive therapy. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PURPOSE: A subset of patients with epilepsy successfully self-predicted seizures in a paper diary study. We conducted an e-diary study to ensure that prediction precedes seizures, and to characterize the prodromal features and time windows that underlie self-prediction. METHODS: Subjects 18 or older with localization-related epilepsy (LRE) and ≥3 seizures per month maintained an e-diary, reporting a.m./p.m. data daily, including mood, premonitory symptoms, and all seizures. Self-prediction was rated by, "How likely are you to experience a seizure (time frame)?" Five choices ranged from almost certain (>95% chance) to very unlikely. Relative odds of seizure (odds ratio, OR) within time frames was examined using Poisson models with log normal random effects to adjust for multiple observations. KEY FINDINGS: Nineteen subjects reported 244 eligible seizures. OR for prediction choices within 6 h was as high as 9.31 (CI 1.92-45.23) for "almost certain." Prediction was most robust within 6 h of diary entry, and remained significant up to 12 h. For nine best predictors, average sensitivity was 50%. Older age contributed to successful self-prediction, and self-prediction appeared to be driven by mood and premonitory symptoms. In multivariate modeling of seizure occurrence, self-prediction (2.84; CI 1.68-4.81), favorable change in mood (0.82; CI 0.67-0.99), and number of premonitory symptoms (1.11; CI 1.00-1.24) were significant. SIGNIFICANCE: Some persons with epilepsy can self-predict seizures. In these individuals, the odds of a seizure following a positive prediction are high. Predictions were robust, not attributable to recall bias, and were related to self-awareness of mood and premonitory features. The 6-h prediction window is suitable for the development of preemptive therapy. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors: Michael R Sperling; Courtney A Schilling; David Glosser; Joseph I Tracy; Ali A Asadi-Pooya Journal: Seizure Date: 2007-10-31 Impact factor: 3.184
Authors: N J Giffin; L Ruggiero; R B Lipton; S D Silberstein; J F Tvedskov; J Olesen; J Altman; P J Goadsby; A Macrae Journal: Neurology Date: 2003-03-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: P Rajna; B Clemens; E Csibri; E Dobos; A Geregely; M Gottschal; I György; A Horváth; F Horváth; L Mezöfi; I Velkey; J Veres; E Wagner Journal: Seizure Date: 1997-10 Impact factor: 3.184
Authors: Irena Balzekas; Vladimir Sladky; Petr Nejedly; Benjamin H Brinkmann; Daniel Crepeau; Filip Mivalt; Nicholas M Gregg; Tal Pal Attia; Victoria S Marks; Lydia Wheeler; Tori E Riccelli; Jeffrey P Staab; Brian Nils Lundstrom; Kai J Miller; Jamie Van Gompel; Vaclav Kremen; Paul E Croarkin; Gregory A Worrell Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2021-07-26 Impact factor: 3.473
Authors: Bo Biering-Sørensen; Helle K Iversen; Inge M S Frederiksen; Jeanet R Vilhelmsen; Fin Biering-Sørensen Journal: Int J Rehabil Res Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 1.479
Authors: Andrea Biondi; Petroula Laiou; Elisa Bruno; Pedro F Viana; Martijn Schreuder; William Hart; Ewan Nurse; Deb K Pal; Mark P Richardson Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2021-03-19
Authors: Benjamin H Brinkmann; Philippa J Karoly; Ewan S Nurse; Sonya B Dumanis; Mona Nasseri; Pedro F Viana; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage; Dean R Freestone; Greg Worrell; Mark P Richardson; Mark J Cook Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2021-07-13 Impact factor: 4.003