Literature DB >> 24108532

Pediatric oncology surveillance imaging: two recommendations. Abandon CT scanning, and randomize to imaging or solely clinical follow-up.

Kieran McHugh1, Derek J Roebuck.   

Abstract

Radiologic assessments in children with cancer provide information crucial to patient management at diagnosis and during follow-up. Many studies have now been published, however, questioning the usefulness of off-therapy surveillance imaging. There is growing concern regarding the hazards from diagnostic irradiation to young patients, most notably from CT scanning. In this paper we advocate abandoning repeated CT surveillance in young patients with a previously treated solid malignancy not arising in the central nervous system. In addition, randomized studies of imaging surveillance versus no imaging surveillance strategies are needed to determine whether earlier detection of recurrence results in improved survival.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; pediatric oncology; radiology; surveillance

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24108532     DOI: 10.1002/pbc.24757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer        ISSN: 1545-5009            Impact factor:   3.167


  8 in total

Review 1.  Ionizing radiation from computed tomography versus anesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging in infants and children: patient safety considerations.

Authors:  Michael J Callahan; Robert D MacDougall; Sarah D Bixby; Stephan D Voss; Richard L Robertson; Joseph P Cravero
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-11-27

2.  Accuracy of pre-contrast imaging in abdominal magnetic resonance imaging of pediatric oncology patients.

Authors:  Faizah Mohd Zaki; Rahim Moineddin; Ronald Grant; Govind B Chavhan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-07-12

Review 3.  Surveillance imaging in pediatric lymphoma.

Authors:  Stephan D Voss; Mitchell S Cairo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-10-16

4.  Impact of Surveillance Imaging Modality on Survival After Recurrence in Patients With Favorable-Histology Wilms Tumor: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Mullen; Yueh-Yun Chi; Emily Hibbitts; James R Anderson; Katarina J Steacy; James I Geller; Daniel M Green; Geetika Khanna; Marcio H Malogolowkin; Paul E Grundy; Conrad V Fernandez; Jeffrey S Dome
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Neuroblastoma and nephroblastoma: a radiological review.

Authors:  Maureen Dumba; Noorulhuda Jawad; Kieran McHugh
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.909

6.  A systematic review of evidence for and against routine surveillance imaging after completing treatment for childhood extracranial solid tumors.

Authors:  Jessica E Morgan; Ruth Walker; Melissa Harden; Robert S Phillips
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 4.452

7.  Does routine surveillance imaging after completing treatment for childhood solid tumours cause more harm than good? A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Authors:  Jessica E Morgan; Melissa Harden; Robert S Phillips
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-12

8.  Is surveillance imaging in pediatric patients treated for localized rhabdomyosarcoma useful? The European experience.

Authors:  Bas Vaarwerk; Coralie Mallebranche; Maria C Affinita; Johanna H van der Lee; Andrea Ferrari; Julia C Chisholm; Anne-Sophie Defachelles; Gian Luca De Salvo; Nadège Corradini; Veronique Minard-Colin; Carlo Morosi; Hervé J Brisse; Kieran McHugh; Gianni Bisogno; Rick R van Rijn; Daniel Orbach; Johannes H M Merks
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 6.860

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.