Literature DB >> 24108277

Femoral nerve strain at L4-L5 is minimized by hip flexion and increased by table break when performing lateral interbody fusion.

Joseph OʼBrien1, Colin Haines, Zachary A Dooley, Alexander W L Turner, David Jackson.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Anatomic studies have demonstrated that nerves and blood vessels have excursion with extremity range of motion. We have measured femoral nerve excursion with the lateral lumbar transpsoas interbody fusion (LLIF) procedure with changes in table flexion and ipsilateral hip flexion on both sides of 5 cadavers.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of hip range of motion on femoral nerve strain near the L4-L5 disc space because it pertains to the LLIF procedure. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Postoperative thigh symptoms are common after the LLIF procedure. Although nerve strain in general has been shown to impair function, it has not been tested specifically with LLIF.
METHODS: Five cadavers were placed in the lateral position as though undergoing the L4-L5 LLIF procedure. Radiographical markers were implanted into the femoral nerve. Lateral and anteroposterior fluoroscopic images were recorded with 0° initial table flexion and the hip at 0, 20, 40, and 60° flexion. The table was flexed to 40°, and the process repeated. Examination was repeated on the contralateral side and nerve strain and excursion were calculated.
RESULTS: Table flexion results in preloading the femoral nerve when approaching L4-L5. Nerve strain was highest with the table flexed to 40° and the hip at 0° (average, 6%-7%). Strain in the femoral nerve decreased with increasing hip flexion for both table flexion angles. Anterior displacement of the nerve by approximately 1.5 mm was noted at 40° table flexion compared with 0°.
CONCLUSION: Strain values with table flexion of 40° approached those associated with reduced neural blood flow in animal studies. Table flexion should be minimized to the extent possible when performing L4-L5 LLIF. Additionally, hip flexion to 60° can neutralize the neural strain that occurs with aggressive table flexion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24108277     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

Review 1.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Does the hip positioning matter for oblique lumbar interbody fusion approach? A morphometric study.

Authors:  Kaissar Farah; Henri-Arthur Leroy; Melodie-Anne Karnoub; Louis Obled; Stephane Fuentes; Richard Assaker
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Temporary liver and stomach necrosis after lateral approach for interbody fusion and deformity correction of lumbar spine: report of two cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  Haris S Vasiliadis; Regula Teuscher; Mark Kleinschmidt; Susanne Marrè; Paul Heini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Lumbar plexus nervous distortion in XLIF® approach: an anatomic study.

Authors:  Carlo Mandelli; Elena Virginia Colombo; Giovanni Marco Sicuri; Pietro Mortini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Does the L5 spinal nerve move? Anatomical evaluation with implications for postoperative L5 nerve palsy.

Authors:  Basem Ishak; Shogo Kikuta; Tyler Scullen; Joe Iwanaga; Daniel J Denis; Christopher M Maulucci; Aaron S Dumont; R Shane Tubbs
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Anatomical evaluation of lumbar nerves using diffusion tensor imaging and implications of lateral decubitus for lateral transpsoas approach.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Oikawa; Yawara Eguchi; Atsuya Watanabe; Sumihisa Orita; Kazuyo Yamauchi; Miyako Suzuki; Yoshihiro Sakuma; Go Kubota; Kazuhide Inage; Takeshi Sainoh; Jun Sato; Kazuki Fujimoto; Masao Koda; Takeo Furuya; Koji Matsumoto; Yoshitada Masuda; Yasuchika Aoki; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Lumbar plexus safe working zones with lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dallas E Kramer; Cody Woodhouse; Mena G Kerolus; Alexander Yu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 2.721

8.  Psoas Morphology Differs between Supine and Sitting Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lumbar Spine: Implications for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Aaron J Buckland; Bryan M Beaubrun; Evan Isaacs; John Moon; Peter Zhou; Sam Horn; Gregory Poorman; Jared C Tishelman; Louis M Day; Thomas J Errico; Peter G Passias; Themistocles Protopsaltis
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-02-07

9.  Does the Access Angle Change the Risk of Approach-Related Complications in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion? An MRI Study.

Authors:  Chunneng Huang; Zhengkuan Xu; Fangcai Li; Qixin Chen
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2018-06-26

10.  Initial multi-centre clinical experience with prone transpsoas lateral interbody fusion: Feasibility, perioperative outcomes, and lessons learned.

Authors:  Tyler G Smith; Samuel A Joseph; Benjamin Ditty; Rodrigo Amaral; Antoine Tohmeh; William R Taylor; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2021-03-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.