Literature DB >> 24107353

Adaptive evolution of bat dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (dpp4): implications for the origin and emergence of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus.

Jie Cui1, John-Sebastian Eden, Edward C Holmes, Lin-Fa Wang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The newly emerged Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) that first appeared in Saudi Arabia during the summer of 2012 has to date (20th September 2013) caused 58 human deaths. MERS-CoV utilizes the dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) host cell receptor, and analysis of the long-term interaction between virus and receptor provides key information on the evolutionary events that lead to the viral emergence.
FINDINGS: We show that bat DPP4 genes have been subject to significant adaptive evolution, suggestive of a long-term arms-race between bats and MERS related CoVs. In particular, we identify three positively selected residues in DPP4 that directly interact with the viral surface glycoprotein.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the evolutionary lineage leading to MERS-CoV may have circulated in bats for a substantial time period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24107353      PMCID: PMC3852826          DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-10-304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virol J        ISSN: 1743-422X            Impact factor:   4.099


Main text

Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) [1], first described by the World Health Organization (WHO) on 23rd September 2012 [2,3], has to date (20th September 2013) caused 130 laboratory-confirmed human infections with 58 deaths (http://www.who.int/csr/don/2013_09_20/en/index.html). MERS-CoV belongs to lineage C of the genus Betacoronavirus in the family Coronaviridae, and is closely related to Tylonycteris bat coronavirus HKU4 (BtCoV-HKU4), Pipistrellus bat coronavirus HKU5 (Bt-HKU5) [4,5] and CoVs in Nycteris bats [6], suggestive of a bat-origin [6]. Unlike severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) CoV which uses the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor for cell entry [7], MERS-CoV employs the dipeptidyl peptidase 4 receptor (DPP4; also known as CD26), and recent work has demonstrated that expression of both human and bat DPP4 in non-susceptible cells enabled viral entry [8]. Cell-surface receptors such as DPP4 play a key role in facilitating viral invasion and tropism. As a consequence, the long-term co-evolutionary dynamics between hosts and viruses often leave evolutionary footprints in both receptor-encoding genes of hosts and the receptor-binding domains (RBDs) of viruses in the form of positively selected amino acid residues (i.e. adaptive evolution). For example, signatures of recurrent positive selection have been observed in ACE2 genes in bats [9], supporting the past circulation of SARS related CoVs in bats. To better understand the origins of MERS-CoV, as well as their potentially long-term (compared to short-term which lacks virus-host interaction) evolutionary dynamics with bat hosts [5,10], we studied the molecular evolution of DPP4 across the mammalian phylogeny. We first analyzed the selection pressures acting on bat DPP4 genes using the ratio of nonsynonymous (dN) to synonymous (dS) nucleotide substitutions per site (ratio dN/dS), with dN > dS indicative of adaptive evolution. The complete DPP4 mRNA sequence of the common pipistrelle (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) was downloaded from GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) along with that of the common vampire bat (Desmodus rotundus) from one transcriptome database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/178123). These sequences were then used to mine and extract DPP4 mRNA transcripts from a further five bat genomes (Table 1) using tBLASTn and GeneWise [11]. The complete DPP4 genes of bats and non-bat reference genomes from a range of mammalian species (Table 1) were aligned using MUSCLE [12] guided by translated amino acid sequences (n = 32; 727 amino acids). We then compared a series of models within a maximum likelihood framework [13], incorporating the published mammalian species tree [14-16]. This analysis (the Free Ratio model) revealed that the dN/dS value on the bat lineage (0.96) was four times greater than the mammalian average (Figure 1). The higher dN/dS ratios leading to bats (Table 2) during mammalian evolution accord with the growing body of data [5,6,17,18] that the newly emerged MERS-CoV ultimately has a bat-origin.
Table 1

Sequences used in the evolutionary analysis of

Common nameSpecies nameFamilyAccession no.
Sheep
Ovis aries
Bovidae
XM_004004660
Killer whale
Orcinus orca
Delphinidae
XM_004283621
Cow
Bos taurus
Bovidae
NM_174039
Pig
Sus scrofa
Suidae
NM_214257
Pacific walrus
Odobenus rosmarus divergens
Odobenidae
XM_004410199
Ferret
Mustela putorius furo
Mustelidae
DQ266376
Cat
Felis catus
Felidae
NM_001009838
Horse
Equus caballus
Equidae
XM_001493999
Rhinoceros
Ceratotherium simum
Rhinocerotidae
XM_004428264
Large flying fox
Pteropus vampyrus
Pteropodidae
ENSPVAG00000002634
Black flying fox
Pteropus alecto
Pteropodidae
KB031068
Common vampire bat
Desmodus rotundus
Phyllostomidae
GABZ01004546
Brandt’s bat
Myotis brandtii
Vespertilionidae
KE161360
David’s myotis
Myotis davidii
Vespertilionidae
KB109552
Little brown bat
Myotis lucifugus
Vespertilionidae
GL429772
Common pipistrelle
Pipistrellus pipistrellus
Vespertilionidae
KC249974
Guinea pig
Cavia porcellus
Caviidae
XM_003478564
Degu
Octodon degus
Octodontidae
XM_004629976
Lesser Egyptian jerboa
Jaculus jaculus
Dipodidae
XM_004651712
Mouse
Mus musculus
Muridae
BC022183
Rat
Rattus norvegicus
Muridae
NM_012789
Human
Homo sapiens
Hominidae
NM_001935
Chimpanzee
Pan troglodytes
Hominidae
GABE01002695
Pygmy chimpanzee
Pan paniscus
Hominidae
XM_003820939
Gorilla
Gorilla gorilla gorilla
Hominidae
XM_004032706
Orangutan
Pongo abelii
Hominidae
NM_001132869
Gibbon
Nomascus leucogenys
Hylobatidae
XM_003266171
Olive baboon
Papio anubis
Cercopithecidae
XM_003907539
Rhesus monkey
Macaca mulatta
Cercopithecidae
JU474559
Galago
Otolemur garnettii
Galagidae
XM_003795172
Marmoset
Callithrix jacchus
Cebidae
XM_002749392
American pikaOchotona princepsOchotonidaeXM_004577330
Figure 1

Selection pressures on during mammalian evolution. Ratios of nonsynonymous (dN) to synonymous (dS) nucleotide substitutions per site (dN/dS) are shown on four major ancestral branches; dN and dS numbers are also given in parentheses. Values for individual lineages are given in Table 2. DPP4 sequences of bat origin are shaded.

Table 2

Numbers of nonsynonymous (d) and synonymous (d) substitutions per site genes in different mammals

Common namedNdSdN/dS
Sheep
0.004
0.013
0.280
Killer whale
0.023
0.039
0.595
Cow
0.003
0.016
0.157
Pig
0.027
0.109
0.246
Pacific walrus
0.014
0.053
0.260
Ferret
0.015
0.064
0.235
Cat
0.021
0.081
0.258
Horse
0.016
0.055
0.290
Rhinoceros
0.017
0.044
0.385
Large flying fox
0.005
0.001
3.561
Black flying fox
0.004
0.008
0.487
Common vampire bat
0.042
0.125
0.500
Brandt’s bat
0.006
0.012
0.463
David’s myotis
0.010
0.028
0.380
Little brown bat
0.007
0.007
0.943
Common pipistrelle
0.031
0.066
0.470
Guinea pig
0.018
0.078
0.238
Degu
0.016
0.128
0.122
Lesser Egyptian jerboa
0.023
0.179
0.131
Mouse
0.019
0.093
0.206
Rat
0.027
0.110
0.248
Human
0.001
0.007
0.086
Chimpanzee
0.000
0.002
0.000
Pygmy chimpanzee
0.001
0.000
ND
Gorilla
0.003
0.004
0.863
Orangutan
0.002
0.000
ND
Gibbon
0.003
0.009
0.344
Olive baboon
0.000
0.005
0.000
Rhesus monkey
0.000
0.004
0.000
Galago
0.022
0.149
0.149
Marmoset
0.009
0.053
0.160
American pika0.0360.2290.156

ND: Not determined because no synonymous substitutions are present.

Sequences used in the evolutionary analysis of Selection pressures on during mammalian evolution. Ratios of nonsynonymous (dN) to synonymous (dS) nucleotide substitutions per site (dN/dS) are shown on four major ancestral branches; dN and dS numbers are also given in parentheses. Values for individual lineages are given in Table 2. DPP4 sequences of bat origin are shaded. Numbers of nonsynonymous (d) and synonymous (d) substitutions per site genes in different mammals ND: Not determined because no synonymous substitutions are present. We next analysed the selection pressures at individual amino acid sites in bat DPP4. Using the Bayesian FUBAR method [19] in HyPhy package [20], we identified six codons that were assigned dN/dS > 1 with higher posterior probability (a strict cut-off of 95% in this analysis) (Table 3). To identify those sites under positive selection that may interact directly with MERS-CoV-like spike protein, bat DPP4 (from the common pipistrelle) was modelled against the structure of the human DPP4/MERS-CoV spike complex [21] (Figure 2A). This revealed that three of the six positive selected residues (position 187, 288 and 392) were located at the interface between bat DPP4 and MERS-CoV RBD (receptor binding domain) (Figure 2). These residues therefore provide direct evidence of a long-term co-evolutionary history between viruses and their hosts. We also observed several variable regions (Figure 2B) within the bat RBD, that may also have resulted from virally-induced selection pressure and which merit additional investigation in a larger data set.
Table 3

Putatively positive selected codons in bats

Codon positionaPosterior probabilitybdN/dS
46
0.97
14.95
57
0.97
13.13
112
0.94
10.27
187
0.95
8.55
288
0.98
13.90
3920.9714.63

Codon position corresponding to the human DPP4 (NP_001926) protein sequence.

Posterior probability of residues assigned a dN/dS ratio greater than 1.

Figure 2

Interaction of bat DPP4 and MERS-CoV spike protein receptor-binding domain and the location of positively selected sites. The structure was displayed using PyMol v1.6 (http://www.pymol.org/). (A) Homology model showing the structural interactions between bat DPP4 (from common pipistrelle) coloured grey and MERS-CoV spike protein receptor-binding domain coloured blue. The three positively selected residues (positions 187, 288 and 392) located within the interface where the virus-host interact are highlighted as red. (B) Protein alignment of human DPP4 compared to that of seven bat species showing RBD spanning codons 41 – 400. Conserved and variable positions are shown in black and grey text, respectively, and residues under positive selection are coloured red.

Putatively positive selected codons in bats Codon position corresponding to the human DPP4 (NP_001926) protein sequence. Posterior probability of residues assigned a dN/dS ratio greater than 1. Interaction of bat DPP4 and MERS-CoV spike protein receptor-binding domain and the location of positively selected sites. The structure was displayed using PyMol v1.6 (http://www.pymol.org/). (A) Homology model showing the structural interactions between bat DPP4 (from common pipistrelle) coloured grey and MERS-CoV spike protein receptor-binding domain coloured blue. The three positively selected residues (positions 187, 288 and 392) located within the interface where the virus-host interact are highlighted as red. (B) Protein alignment of human DPP4 compared to that of seven bat species showing RBD spanning codons 41 – 400. Conserved and variable positions are shown in black and grey text, respectively, and residues under positive selection are coloured red. Our analysis therefore suggests that the evolutionary lineage leading to current MERS-CoV co-evolved with bat hosts for an extended time period, eventually jumping species boundaries to infect humans and perhaps through an intermediate host. As such, the emergence of MERS-CoV may parallel that of the related SARS-CoV [22]. Although one bat species, Taphozous erforatus, in Saudi Arabia has been found to harbour a small RdRp (RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase) fragment of MERS-CoV [17], a larger viral sampling of bats and other animals with close exposure to humans, including dromedary camels were serological evidence for MERS-CoV has been identified [23], are clearly needed to better understand the viral transmission route. Alternatively, it is possible that the adaptive evolution present on the bat DPP4 was due to viruses other than MERS-CoVs, and which will need to be better assessed when a larger number of viruses are available for analysis. Overall, our study provides evidence that a long-term evolutionary arms race likely occurred between MERS related CoVs and bats.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

JC and LFW designed the research. JC and JSE analysed the data. JC and ECH drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  23 in total

1.  MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  A molecular phylogeny for bats illuminates biogeography and the fossil record.

Authors:  Emma C Teeling; Mark S Springer; Ole Madsen; Paul Bates; Stephen J O'brien; William J Murphy
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  HyPhy: hypothesis testing using phylogenies.

Authors:  Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond; Simon D W Frost; Spencer V Muse
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-10-27       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood.

Authors:  Ziheng Yang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Evidence for ACE2-utilizing coronaviruses (CoVs) related to severe acute respiratory syndrome CoV in bats.

Authors:  Ann Demogines; Michael Farzan; Sara L Sawyer
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 6.  Mammalian phylogenomics comes of age.

Authors:  William J Murphy; Pavel A Pevzner; Stephen J O'Brien
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  Severe respiratory illness caused by a novel coronavirus, in a patient transferred to the United Kingdom from the Middle East, September 2012.

Authors:  A Bermingham; M A Chand; C S Brown; E Aarons; C Tong; C Langrish; K Hoschler; K Brown; M Galiano; R Myers; R G Pebody; H K Green; N L Boddington; R Gopal; N Price; W Newsholme; C Drosten; R A Fouchier; M Zambon
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2012-10-04

8.  A molecular phylogeny of living primates.

Authors:  Polina Perelman; Warren E Johnson; Christian Roos; Hector N Seuánez; Julie E Horvath; Miguel A M Moreira; Bailey Kessing; Joan Pontius; Melody Roelke; Yves Rumpler; Maria Paula C Schneider; Artur Silva; Stephen J O'Brien; Jill Pecon-Slattery
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in bats, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Ziad A Memish; Nischay Mishra; Kevin J Olival; Shamsudeen F Fagbo; Vishal Kapoor; Jonathan H Epstein; Rafat Alhakeem; Abdulkareem Durosinloun; Mushabab Al Asmari; Ariful Islam; Amit Kapoor; Thomas Briese; Peter Daszak; Abdullah A Al Rabeeah; W Ian Lipkin
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Evolutionary relationships between bat coronaviruses and their hosts.

Authors:  Jie Cui; Naijian Han; Daniel Streicker; Gang Li; Xianchun Tang; Zhengli Shi; Zhihong Hu; Guoping Zhao; Arnaud Fontanet; Yi Guan; Linfa Wang; Gareth Jones; Hume E Field; Peter Daszak; Shuyi Zhang
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: another zoonotic betacoronavirus causing SARS-like disease.

Authors:  Jasper F W Chan; Susanna K P Lau; Kelvin K W To; Vincent C C Cheng; Patrick C Y Woo; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Permissivity of Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Orthologs to Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Is Governed by Glycosylation and Other Complex Determinants.

Authors:  Kayla M Peck; Trevor Scobey; Jesica Swanstrom; Kara L Jensen; Christina L Burch; Ralph S Baric; Mark T Heise
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Exceptional diversity and selection pressure on coronavirus host receptors in bats compared to other mammals.

Authors:  Hannah K Frank; David Enard; Scott D Boyd
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 5.530

4.  The Role of Host Genetic Factors in Coronavirus Susceptibility: Review of Animal and Systematic Review of Human Literature.

Authors:  Marissa LoPresti; David B Beck; Priya Duggal; Derek A T Cummings; Benjamin D Solomon
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2020-06-03

5.  The virus-host interface: Molecular interactions of Alphacoronavirus-1 variants from wild and domestic hosts with mammalian aminopeptidase N.

Authors:  Ximena A Olarte-Castillo; Joana F Dos Remédios; Felix Heeger; Heribert Hofer; Stephan Karl; Alex D Greenwood; Marion L East
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 6.  Receptor-binding domain-based subunit vaccines against MERS-CoV.

Authors:  Naru Zhang; Jian Tang; Lu Lu; Shibo Jiang; Lanying Du
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.303

7.  Filovirus receptor NPC1 contributes to species-specific patterns of ebolavirus susceptibility in bats.

Authors:  Melinda Ng; Esther Ndungo; Maria E Kaczmarek; Andrew S Herbert; Tabea Binger; Ana I Kuehne; Rohit K Jangra; John A Hawkins; Robert J Gifford; Rohan Biswas; Ann Demogines; Rebekah M James; Meng Yu; Thijn R Brummelkamp; Christian Drosten; Lin-Fa Wang; Jens H Kuhn; Marcel A Müller; John M Dye; Sara L Sawyer; Kartik Chandran
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 8.  Evolution, Ecology, and Zoonotic Transmission of Betacoronaviruses: A Review.

Authors:  Herbert F Jelinek; Mira Mousa; Eman Alefishat; Wael Osman; Ian Spence; Dengpan Bu; Samuel F Feng; Jason Byrd; Paola A Magni; Shafi Sahibzada; Guan K Tay; Habiba S Alsafar
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-05-20

Review 9.  MERS: emergence of a novel human coronavirus.

Authors:  V Stalin Raj; Albert D M E Osterhaus; Ron A M Fouchier; Bart L Haagmans
Journal:  Curr Opin Virol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 7.090

10.  Bat consumption in Thailand.

Authors:  Kanokwan Suwannarong; Sidney Schuler
Journal:  Infect Ecol Epidemiol       Date:  2016-01-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.