| Literature DB >> 24106506 |
Alyaa A Kotby1, Manal M Abdel Aziz, Waleed M El Guindy, Amira N Moneer.
Abstract
Background. Tenascin-C (TN-C) is an extracellular matrix glycoprotein that appears at sites of inflammation in cardiac pathologies. Aim of the Work. To evaluate the role of TN-C as a marker for active inflammation in children with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Subjects and Methods. 24 consecutive patients with primary nonfamilial DCM aged 6-72 months (mean 45.19 ± 11.03) were divided into group I, twelve patients with acute onset DCM (<6 months duration), and group II, twelve patients with chronic DCM (>6 months duration), and compared to 20 healthy age- and sex-matched controls. Investigations included estimation of serum TN-C and echocardiographic evaluation using M-mode and 2D speckle tracking echocardiography (STE). Results. Serum TN-C showed a higher significant statistical elevation among patients than controls (P < 0.001) and in group I than group II (P < 0.001). EF was significantly decreased, and LVEDD and EDV increased in patients than controls and in GI than GII. STE showed a statistically significant difference in global peak strain longitudinal (GPSL) average in patients than controls (P < 0.05) and between GI and GII (P < 0.001). STE wall motion scoring showed normokinesia (33.5%), hypokinesia (8.33%), and akinesia (50%) in GI and hypokinesia (100%) in GII. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between serum TN-C and GPSL average. Conclusions. Increased serum TN-C can be used as a marker of inflammation in DCM and is associated with the severity of heart failure and LV dysfunction as detected by STE.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24106506 PMCID: PMC3782834 DOI: 10.1155/2013/608563
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Pediatr ISSN: 1687-9740
A highly significant statistical difference between patients and controls as regard serum tenascin-C level.
| Tenascin-C (ng/mL) | DCM patients | Controls |
|---|---|---|
| Range | 18–90 | 4.5–12.5 |
| Mean | 47.45 | 6.50 |
| ±SD | 15.89 | 1.67 |
|
| 11.472 | |
|
| <0.001 highly significant | |
Serum tenascin-C levels in groups I and II.
| Tenascin-C (ng/mL) | Group I | Group II |
|---|---|---|
| Range | 42.5–90 | 18–47.5 |
| Mean | 59.25 | 35.83 |
| ±SD | 11.82 | 9.45 |
|
| 5.358 | |
|
| <0.001 highly significant | |
M-mode echocardiographic data of patients compared to controls.
| M-mode |
| Mean | ±SD |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVIDD (cm) | Patients | 24 | 3.84 | 1.18 | 4.860 |
|
| Control | 20 | 2.52 | 0.29 | |||
|
| ||||||
| LVIDS (cm) | Patients | 24 | 3.13 | 1.24 | 4.223 |
|
| Control | 20 | 1.95 | 0.06 | |||
|
| ||||||
| EDV (mL) | Patients | 24 | 79.16 | 55.25 | 3.645 |
|
| Control | 20 | 33.90 | 2.26 | |||
|
| ||||||
| ESV (mL) | Patients | 24 | 50.79 | 42.29 | 3.806 |
|
| Control | 20 | 14.70 | 1.78 | |||
|
| ||||||
| EF% | Patients | 24 | 45 | 17.46 | 4.385 |
|
| Control | 20 | 62.25 | 2.44 | |||
|
| ||||||
| FS% | Patients | 24 | 22.91 | 10.72 | 3.855 |
|
| Control | 20 | 32.25 | 1.40 | |||
|
| ||||||
| LA/AO | Patients | 24 | 1.78 | 0.88 | 2.006 | >0.05 |
| Control | 20 | 0.88 | 0.30 | |||
**Highly significant, *Significant. LVIDD: left ventricular internal diameter in diastole, LVIDS: left ventricular internal diameter in systole, EF: ejection fraction, FS: fraction shortening, AO: aortic annulus, LA: left atrium, EDV: end-diastolic volume, ESV: end-systolic volume, LA: left atrium, and Ao: aorta.
M-mode echocardiographic data of group I compared to group II.
| M-mode |
| Mean | ±SD |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVIDD (cm) | Group I | 12 | 4.62 | 0.91 | 4.264 |
|
| Group II | 12 | 3.06 | 0.87 | |||
|
| ||||||
| LVIDS (cm) | Group I | 12 | 4.10 | 0.79 | 5.997 |
|
| Group II | 12 | 2.17 | 0.77 | |||
|
| ||||||
| EDV (mL) | Group I | 12 | 118.6 | 40.5 | 5.013 |
|
| Group II | 12 | 39.66 | 36.5 | |||
|
| ||||||
| ESV (mL) | Group I | 12 | 84.41 | 30.9 | 6.528 |
|
| Group II | 12 | 17.16 | 17.8 | |||
|
| ||||||
| EF% | Group I | 12 | 31.66 | 9.14 | 5.841 |
|
| Group II | 12 | 58.33 | 12.90 | |||
|
| ||||||
| FS% | Group I | 12 | 14.75 | 4.18 | 5.799 |
|
| Group II | 12 | 31.08 | 8.81 | |||
|
| ||||||
| LA/AO | Group I | 12 | 2.20 | 1.08 | 2.558 |
|
| Group II | 12 | 1.37 | 0.26 | |||
**Highly significant, *Significant. LVIDD: left Ventricular internal diameter in diastole, LVIDS: left ventricular internal diameter in systole, EF: ejection fraction, FS: fraction shortening, AO: aortic annulus, LA: left atrium, EDV: end-diastolic volume, ESV: end-systolic volume, LA: left atrium, and Ao: aorta.
G-peak sl ap lax, G peak sl a2c, G peak sl a4c, and G peak sl avg in group I and group II.
| Tissue |
| Range | Mean | ±SD |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G peak sl ap lax | Group I | 12 | −7–−20 | −12.08 | 5.36 | 4.922 | 0.001** |
| Group II | 12 | −16–−24 | −20.50 | 2.50 | |||
|
| |||||||
| G peak sl a4c | Group I | 12 | −4–−20 | −11.91 | 5.35 | 2.042 | <0.05* |
| Group II | 12 | −10–−23 | −15.41 | 2.574 | |||
|
| |||||||
| G peak sl a2c | Group I | 12 | −9–−19 | −14 | 6.53 | 4.227 | 0.001** |
| Group II | 12 | −15–−25 | −24.2 | 5.27 | |||
|
| |||||||
| Peak sl avg | Group I | 12 | −6–−19 | −12.25 | 5.62 | 2.585 | <0.05* |
| Group II | 12 | −18–−24 | −18.41 | 6.05 | |||
**Highly significant, *Significant.
Figure 1A negative correlation between serum tenascin-c level and ejection fraction in patients.
Figure 2A positive correlation between serum tenascin-c and end diastolic volume in patients.
Figure 3A significant positive correlation between serum tenascin-c level and global peak longitudinal strain average in DCM patients.
Figure 4A significant positive correlation between serum tenascin-c and global peak longitudinal strain average in group I.
Figure 5An insignificant negative correlation between serum TN-C and global peak longitudinal strain average in group II.