Literature DB >> 2410571

Relief of pain from a phantom limb by peripheral stimulation.

T Lundeberg.   

Abstract

In the present study, 24 patients suffering pain from a phantom limb were given vibratory stimulation or placebo as a pain-relieving measure. During stimulation, a reduction in pain was reported by 75% of the patients as compared to 44% during placebo. Depending on the phantom sensation, the best pain-reducing site was found to be either the area of pain or the antagonistic muscle. In 90% of the patients the best pain-reducing effect was obtained when stimulation was applied with moderate pressure over a large area. The results of the present study suggest that vibratory stimulation may be a valuable symptomatic treatment measure in patients suffering pain from a phantom limb.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2410571     DOI: 10.1007/bf00313905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  18 in total

1.  The immediate shift of afferent drive to dorsal column nucleus cells following deafferentation: a comparison of acute and chronic deafferentation in gracile nucleus and spinal cord.

Authors:  J O Dostrovsky; J Millar; P D Wall
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Post amputation phantom limb pain.

Authors:  W A Brown
Journal:  Dis Nerv Syst       Date:  1968-05

3.  Substance P in spinal cord dorsal horn decreases following peripheral nerve injury.

Authors:  D Barbut; J M Polak; P D Wall
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1981-02-02       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  The effect of peripheral nerve injury on dorsal root potentials and on transmission of afferent signals into the spinal cord.

Authors:  P D Wall; M Devor
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1981-03-23       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  The pain suppressive effect of vibratory stimulation and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) as compared to aspirin.

Authors:  T Lundeberg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1984-03-05       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  A survey of current phantom limb pain treatment in the United States.

Authors:  R A Sherman; C J Sherman; N G Gall
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Changes in primary afferent depolarization of sensory neurones during peripheral nerve regeneration in the cat.

Authors:  K W Horch; S J Lisney
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  The influence of naloxone on analgesia produced by peripheral conditioning stimulation.

Authors:  B H Sjölund; M B Eriksson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1979-09-14       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Mapping and plasticity of acid phosphatase afferents in the rat dorsal horn.

Authors:  M Devor; D Claman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1980-05-19       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Phantom limb, phantom pain and stump pain in amputees during the first 6 months following limb amputation.

Authors:  T S Jensen; B Krebs; J Nielsen; P Rasmussen
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Optimal treatment of phantom limb pain in the elderly.

Authors:  R Baron; G Wasner; V Lindner
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Patient perceptions of vulvar vibration therapy for refractory vulvar pain.

Authors:  Denniz Zolnoun; Georgine Lamvu; John Steege
Journal:  Sex Relation Ther       Date:  2008-11-01

Review 3.  A review of the management of phantom limb pain: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Cliff Richardson; Jai Kulkarni
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.133

4.  Visually induced analgesia during face or limb stimulation in healthy and migraine subjects.

Authors:  Simona Liliana Sava; Victor de Pasqua; Alain Maertens de Noordhout; Jean Schoenen
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.133

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.