Literature DB >> 24105346

Comparison of 1.5- and 3-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee.

Pieter Van Dyck1, Christoph Kenis, Filip M Vanhoenacker, Valérie Lambrecht, Kristien Wouters, Jan L Gielen, Lieven Dossche, Paul M Parizel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective study was to compare routine MRI scans of the knee at 1.5 and 3 T obtained in the same individuals in terms of their performance in the diagnosis of cartilage lesions.
METHODS: One hundred patients underwent MRI of the knee at 1.5 and 3 T and subsequent knee arthroscopy. All MR examinations consisted of multiplanar 2D turbo spin-echo sequences. Three radiologists independently graded all articular surfaces of the knee joint seen at MRI. With arthroscopy as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 1.5- and 3-T MRI for detecting cartilage lesions and the proportion of correctly graded cartilage lesions within the knee joint were determined and compared using resampling statistics.
RESULTS: For all readers and surfaces combined, the respective sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting all grades of cartilage lesions in the knee joint using MRI were 60, 96, and 87% at 1.5 T and 69, 96, and 90% at 3 T. There was a statistically significant improvement in sensitivity (p < 0.05), but not specificity or accuracy (n.s.) for the detection of cartilage lesions at 3 T. There was also a statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvement in the proportion of correctly graded cartilage lesions at 3 T as compared to 1.5 T.
CONCLUSION: A 3-T MR protocol significantly improves diagnostic performance for the purpose of detecting cartilage lesions within the knee joint, when compared with a similar protocol performed at 1.5 T. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24105346     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2704-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  30 in total

1.  0.2-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of internal lesions of the knee joint: a prospective arthroscopically controlled clinical study.

Authors:  K A Riel; M Reinisch; B Kersting-Sommerhoff; N Hof; T Merl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Reproducibility and reliability of the outerbridge classification for grading chondral lesions of the knee arthroscopically.

Authors:  Michelle L Cameron; Karen K Briggs; J Richard Steadman
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 3.  A systematic approach to magnetic resonance imaging interpretation of sports medicine injuries of the knee.

Authors:  Timothy G Sanders; Mark D Miller
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 4.  A system for grading articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy.

Authors:  F R Noyes; C L Stabler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 5.  The diagnostic performance of MRI in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Menashe; K Hirko; E Losina; M Kloppenburg; W Zhang; L Li; D J Hunter
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 6.  Articular cartilage in the knee: current MR imaging techniques and applications in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Michel D Crema; Frank W Roemer; Monica D Marra; Deborah Burstein; Garry E Gold; Felix Eckstein; Thomas Baum; Timothy J Mosher; John A Carrino; Ali Guermazi
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 7.  Advances in imaging of osteoarthritis and cartilage.

Authors:  Frank W Roemer; Michel D Crema; Siegfried Trattnig; Ali Guermazi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  The evaluation of articular cartilage lesions of the knee with a 3-Tesla magnet.

Authors:  Lars Victor von Engelhardt; Clayton N Kraft; Peter H Pennekamp; Hans Heinz Schild; Alfred Schmitz; Marcus von Falkenhausen
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Comparison of T1rho relaxation times between ACL-reconstructed knees and contralateral uninjured knees.

Authors:  Alexander A Theologis; Bryan Haughom; Fei Liang; Yu Zhang; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link; C Benjamin Ma; Xiaojuan Li
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Diagnosis of chondral lesions of the knee joint: can MRI replace arthroscopy? A prospective study.

Authors:  B Friemert; Y Oberländer; W Schwarz; H J Häberle; W Bähren; H Gerngross; B Danz
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-08-05       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  8 in total

1.  Routine clinical knee MR reports: comparison of diagnostic performance at 1.5 T and 3.0 T for assessment of the articular cartilage.

Authors:  Jacob C Mandell; Jeffrey A Rhodes; Nehal Shah; Glenn C Gaviola; Andreas H Gomoll; Stacy E Smith
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Mapping tibiofemoral gonarthrosis: an MRI analysis of non-traumatic knee cartilage defects.

Authors:  D S Evangelopoulos; M Huesler; S S Ahmad; E Aghayev; M Neukamp; C Röder; A Exadaktylos; H Bonel; S Kohl
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Comparison of clinical, MRI and arthroscopic assessments of chronic ACL injuries, meniscal tears and cartilage defects.

Authors:  L Felli; G Garlaschi; A Muda; A Tagliafico; M Formica; A Zanirato; M Alessio-Mazzola
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-09-14

4.  High resolution MRI imaging at 9.4 Tesla of the osteochondral unit in a translational model of articular cartilage repair.

Authors:  Lars Goebel; Andreas Müller; Arno Bücker; Henning Madry
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Accuracy of cartilage-specific 3-Tesla 3D-DESS magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of chondral lesions: comparison with knee arthroscopy.

Authors:  Sandro Kohl; Simon Meier; Sufian S Ahmad; Harald Bonel; Aristomenis K Exadaktylos; Anna Krismer; Dimitrios Stergios Evangelopoulos
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Cartilage Delamination Flap Mimicking a Torn Medial Meniscus.

Authors:  Gan Zhi-Wei Jonathan; Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak; Mitra Amit Kanta
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2016-12-13

Review 7.  Reporting knee meniscal tears: technical aspects, typical pitfalls and how to avoid them.

Authors:  Nicolae V Bolog; Gustav Andreisek
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2016-02-16

8.  Traumatic Meniscus and Cruciate Ligament Tears in Young Patients: A Comparison of 3T Versus 1.5T MRI.

Authors:  Nasreddine Nouri; Mouna Chelli Bouaziz; Hend Riahi; Meriem Mechri; Abdelhakim Kherfani; Moez Ouertatani; Mohamed Fethi Ladeb
Journal:  J Belg Soc Radiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 1.894

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.