Literature DB >> 24105289

Percutaneous cholecystostomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis in the era of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Mehrdad Nikfarjam1, Lilly Shen, Michael A Fink, Vijayaragavan Muralidharan, Graham Starkey, Robert M Jones, Christopher Christophi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute cholecystitis is a common surgical problem that is optimally managed by early laparoscopic cholecystectomy when possible. Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) has been used in certain high-risk cases as a bridge to surgery or for definitive therapy. The aim of this study was to determine the short-term and long-term outcomes of patients with acute cholecystitis treated by PC. STUDY
DESIGN: Patients with acute cholecystitis treated by PC between 2005 and 2011 in a tertiary hospital were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Outcome differences between patients with acalculous acute cholecystitis (AAC) and those with acute cholecystitis relating to gallstones were determined.
RESULTS: There were 32 cases from a total of 443 patients with acute cholecystitis treated by PC during the study period. The overall 30-day mortality rate after PC was 9%. There were 8 patients with AAC in this series. Ischemic heart disease and chronic renal failure were noted in 47% and 41% of patients, respectively. In all cases, patients were considered unfit for surgery. AAC was more common in male patients. In all other aspects patients with AAC had similar characteristics to those with gallstones. Patients underwent percutaneous drainage a median of 3 days after admission with a direct transperitoneal route used in 16 (75%) cases. Positive bile cultures from the gallbladder were noted in 60% of cases tested. Complications were noted in 53% of patients and were related to the cholecystostomy tube in 19% of cases. Subsequent cholecystectomy was performed in 9 (28%) patients, at a median of 73 days after initial tube insertion. No differences in morbidity and mortality were noted between patients with AAC and those with gallstones. The overall mean and 12 months survival was 43 months and 72%, respectively. Hypotension at presentation (odds ratio 9.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-59.8; P=0.019) and absence of bile duct filling on cholecystography (odds ratio 4.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-16.3; P=0.017) were independently associated with decreased survival.
CONCLUSIONS: PC can be performed safely in patients considered unfit for surgery at presentation. Outcomes are similar in patients with or without gallstones. Hypotension and absence of common bile duct filling on initial cholangiography are markers of decreased long-term survival. A significant number of patients require subsequent definitive cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24105289     DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318290142d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  10 in total

1.  Outcomes in Older Patients with Grade III Cholecystitis and Cholecystostomy Tube Placement: A Propensity Score Analysis.

Authors:  Francesca M Dimou; Deepak Adhikari; Hemalkumar B Mehta; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Outcome of acute perforated cholecystitis: a register study of over 5000 cases from a quality control database in Germany.

Authors:  Stefan Jansen; Johannes Doerner; Susanne Macher-Heidrich; Hubert Zirngibl; Peter C Ambe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  The Treatment of Critically Ill Patients With Acute Cholecystitis.

Authors:  Peter C Ambe; Sarantos Kaptanis; Marios Papadakis; Sebastian A Weber; Stefan Jansen; Hubert Zirngibl
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Surgical management of empyematous cholecystitis: a register study of over 12,000 cases from a regional quality control database in Germany.

Authors:  Peter C Ambe; Stefan Jansen; Susanne Macher-Heidrich; Hubert Zirngibl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy in elderly patients.

Authors:  Stavros A Antoniou; George A Antoniou; Oliver O Koch; Rudolph Pointner; Frank A Granderath
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Percutaneous cholecystostomy… why, when, what next? A systematic review of past decade.

Authors:  M Elsharif; A Forouzanfar; K Oaikhinan; Niraj Khetan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Role of percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute acalculous cholecystitis: clinical outcomes of 271 patients.

Authors:  Seung Yeon Noh; Dong Il Gwon; Gi-Young Ko; Hyun-Ki Yoon; Kyu-Bo Sung
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Tube cholecystostomy before cholecystectomy for the treatment of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Kei Suzuki; Margaret Bower; Sebastiano Cassaro; Rajesh I Patel; Martin S Karpeh; I Michael Leitman
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acalculous cholecystitis in a neutropenic patient after chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Konrad Pielaciński; Anna Ejduk; Tadeusz Wróblewski; Andrzej B Szczepanik
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 1.195

10.  Is Interval Cholecystectomy Necessary After Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in High-Risk Acute Cholecystitis Patients?

Authors:  Cemal Kaya; Emre Bozkurt; Sinan Ömeroğlu; Pınar Yazıcı; Ufuk Oğuz İdiz; Ömer Naci Tabakçı; Özgür Bostancı; Mehmet Mihmanlı
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2018-03-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.