Literature DB >> 24104775

Long-term patient satisfaction with michigan four-wall sacrospinous ligament suspension for prolapse.

Kindra A Larson1, Tovia Smith, Mitchell B Berger, Melinda Abernethy, Susan Mead, Dee E Fenner, John O L DeLancey, Daniel M Morgan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe patient satisfaction after Michigan four-wall sacrospinous ligament suspension for prolapse and identify factors associated with satisfaction.
METHODS: Four hundred fifty-three patients were asked to rate their satisfaction with surgery and complete validated quality-of-life instruments. Postoperative support was extracted from the medical record and assessed when possible. Factors independently associated with patients who were "highly satisfied" were identified with multivariable logistic regression.
RESULTS: Sixty-two percent (242/392) reported how satisfied they were 8.0±1.7 years later. Fifty-seven percent had failed prior prolapse surgery, and 56% had a preoperative prolapse 4 cm or greater beyond the hymen. Ninety percent were satisfied; 76% were "completely" or "very" satisfied and they were considered "highly satisfied" for analysis. Fourteen percent reporting being "moderately" satisfied and they were considered among those "less satisfied." Women with lower scores on the postoperative Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 were more likely to be "highly satisfied." Postoperative anatomic data were available for 67% (162/242) and vaginal support was observed at or above the hymen in 86%. Women with preoperative Baden Walker grade 3 or 4 prolapse were more likely than those with grade 2 prolapse to be "highly satisfied." Women with advanced postoperative prolapse (grade 3 or 4) were less likely and those with grade 2 support were as likely to be "highly satisfied" as those with grade 0 or 1 support.
CONCLUSION: The Michigan four-wall sacrospinous ligament suspension is an anatomically effective approach to vault suspension with a high rate of long-term patient satisfaction. Postoperative vaginal support at the hymen does not negatively affect patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24104775      PMCID: PMC3860104          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a7f0d5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  10 in total

1.  The underutilization of obliterative and constrictive surgery in the surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Tony Bazi
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Joint report on terminology for surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Symptom Relief and Retreatment After Vaginal, Open, or Robotic Surgery for Apical Vaginal Prolapse.

Authors:  Mallika Anand; Amy L Weaver; Kristin M Fruth; Emanuel C Trabuco; John B Gebhart
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 2.091

4.  Analysis of long-term structural failure after native tissue prolapse surgery: a 3D stress MRI-based study.

Authors:  Luyun Chen; Payton Schmidt; John O DeLancey; Carolyn W Swenson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 1.932

Review 5.  Native tissue repair for central compartment prolapse: a narrative review.

Authors:  Dorit Paz-Levy; David Yohay; Joerg Neymeyer; Ranit Hizkiyahu; Adi Y Weintraub
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  The length of anterior vaginal wall exposed to external pressure on maximal straining MRI: relationship to urogenital hiatus diameter, and apical and bladder location.

Authors:  Aisha Yousuf; Luyun Chen; Kindra Larson; James A Ashton-Miller; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Surgical Updates in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Julia Geynisman-Tan; Kimberly Kenton
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2017-04-28

8.  Life after pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a qualitative study in Amhara region, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Janne L Gjerde; Guri Rortveit; Mulat Adefris; Tadesse Belayneh; Astrid Blystad
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  Preoperative level II/III MRI measures predicting long-term prolapse recurrence after native tissue repair.

Authors:  Payton Schmidt; Luyun Chen; John O DeLancey; Carolyn W Swenson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 1.932

10.  The clinical and urodynamic outcomes of single-incision mesh surgery using the Uphold system for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Pei-Chi Wu; Chin-Hu Wu; Yiyin Liu; Zixi Loo; Kun-Ling Lin; Cheng-Yu Long
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.