Sawsan As-Sanie1, Richard E Harris, Steven E Harte, Frank F Tu, Gina Neshewat, Daniel J Clauw. 1. Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Anesthesiology, and Internal Medicine (Rheumatology), University of Michigan Health Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northshore University Health System, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether women with chronic pelvic pain and variable degrees of endometriosis demonstrate altered pain sensitivity relative to pain-free healthy women in a control group and whether such differences are related to the presence or severity of endometriosis or comorbid pain syndromes. METHODS: Four patient subgroups (endometriosis with chronic pelvic pain [n=42], endometriosis with dysmenorrhea [n=15], pain-free endometriosis [n=35], and chronic pelvic pain without endometriosis [n=22]) were each compared with 30 healthy women in a control group in this cross-sectional study. All patients completed validated questionnaires regarding pain symptoms and underwent screening for comorbid pain disorders. Pain sensitivity was assessed by applying discrete pressure stimuli to the thumbnail using a previously validated protocol. RESULTS: While adjusting for age and education, pain thresholds were lower in all subgroups of women with pelvic pain relative to healthy women in the control group (all P values <.01). There was no difference in pain thresholds when comparing patients with endometriosis without pelvic pain with healthy women in the control group (mean difference 0.02 kg/m2, 95% confidence interval -0.43 to 0.47). The presence and severity of endometriosis and number of comorbid pain syndromes were not associated with a difference in pain thresholds. CONCLUSION: Women with chronic pelvic pain demonstrate increased pain sensitivity at a nonpelvic site compared with healthy women in a control group, which is independent of the presence or severity of endometriosis or comorbid pain syndromes. These findings support the notion that central pain amplification may play a role in the development of pelvic pain and may explain why some women with pelvic pain do not respond to therapies aimed at eliminating endometriosis lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether women with chronic pelvic pain and variable degrees of endometriosis demonstrate altered pain sensitivity relative to pain-free healthy women in a control group and whether such differences are related to the presence or severity of endometriosis or comorbid pain syndromes. METHODS: Four patient subgroups (endometriosis with chronic pelvic pain [n=42], endometriosis with dysmenorrhea [n=15], pain-free endometriosis [n=35], and chronic pelvic pain without endometriosis [n=22]) were each compared with 30 healthy women in a control group in this cross-sectional study. All patients completed validated questionnaires regarding pain symptoms and underwent screening for comorbid pain disorders. Pain sensitivity was assessed by applying discrete pressure stimuli to the thumbnail using a previously validated protocol. RESULTS: While adjusting for age and education, pain thresholds were lower in all subgroups of women with pelvic pain relative to healthy women in the control group (all P values <.01). There was no difference in pain thresholds when comparing patients with endometriosis without pelvic pain with healthy women in the control group (mean difference 0.02 kg/m2, 95% confidence interval -0.43 to 0.47). The presence and severity of endometriosis and number of comorbid pain syndromes were not associated with a difference in pain thresholds. CONCLUSION:Women with chronic pelvic pain demonstrate increased pain sensitivity at a nonpelvic site compared with healthy women in a control group, which is independent of the presence or severity of endometriosis or comorbid pain syndromes. These findings support the notion that central pain amplification may play a role in the development of pelvic pain and may explain why some women with pelvic pain do not respond to therapies aimed at eliminating endometriosis lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Authors: J Quentin Clemens; Chris Mullins; A Lenore Ackerman; Tamara Bavendam; Adrie van Bokhoven; Benjamin M Ellingson; Steven E Harte; Jason J Kutch; H Henry Lai; Katherine T Martucci; Robert Moldwin; Bruce D Naliboff; Michel A Pontari; Siobhan Sutcliffe; J Richard Landis Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Andrew Schrepf; Catherine S Bradley; Michael O'Donnell; Yi Luo; Steven E Harte; Karl Kreder; Susan Lutgendorf Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: H Henry Lai; Bruce Naliboff; Alice B Liu; Cindy L Amundsen; Joshua S Shimony; Vincent A Magnotta; Joseph J Shaffer; Robin L Gilliam; Jonathan B Wiseman; Margaret E Helmuth; Victor P Andreev; Ziya Kirkali; Steven E Harte Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-09-21 Impact factor: 2.226