| Literature DB >> 24104596 |
Yukwon Jeon1, Dae-Hwan Park, Joo-Il Park, Seong-Ho Yoon, Isao Mochida, Jin-Ho Choy, Yong-Gun Shul.
Abstract
Design of catalytic materials has been highlighted to build ultraclean use of heavy oil including liquid-to-gas technology to directlyEntities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24104596 PMCID: PMC3793222 DOI: 10.1038/srep02902
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1A. Schematic diagram of the formation of hollow fibrous perovskite B. XRD patterns of the hollow fibers: (a) LaCr0.8Ru0.2O3, (b) LaCr0.8Ru0.1Ni0.1O3, (c) LaCr0.8Ni0.2O3, and (d) LaCrO3.
Figure 2A. SEM images (inset: photograph) and B. HR-TEM images (inset: SAED pattern and height profile) of the hollow fibers: (a) LaCr0.8Ru0.2O3, (b) LaCr0.8Ru0.1Ni0.1O3, and (c) LaCr0.8Ni0.2O3.
Figure 3XPS spectra of A. La 3d, B. Cr 2p3/2, C. O 1s, D. Ru 3p3/2, and E. Ni 3p3/2 of the hollow fibers: (a) LaCr0.8Ru0.2O3, (b) LaCr0.8Ru0.1Ni0.1O3, (c) LaCr0.8Ni0.2O3, and (d) LaCrO3.
Figure 4A. H2–TPR profiles of the hollow fibers: (a) LaCr0.8Ru0.2O3, (b) LaCr0.8Ru0.1Ni0.1O3, (c) LaCr0.8Ni0.2O3, and (d) LaCrO3. B. H2 production (mol%) of as-prepared perovkskite catalysts for ATR reaction using hexadecane (C16H34), with an addition of sulphur, Dibenzothiophene, at content of 100 ppm: (a) LaCr0.8Ru0.1Ni0.1O3 hollow fiber, (b) LaCr0.8Ru0.2O3 hollow fiber, (c) LaCr0.8Ru0.1Ni0.1O3 grain, (d) Pt-GDC, (e) LaCr0.8Ru0.2O3 grain, (f) LaCr0.8Ni0.2O3 hollow fiber, and (g) LaCrO3 hollow fiber. (C16H34 = 0.012 ml·min−1, H2O/O2/C = 1.25/0.4/1, 1027 K, GHSV = 4000 h−1).
Figure 5GC–AED profiles for A. carbon, B. sulfur, and C. nitrogen species of the (a) HGO, (b), MGO (c) LGO, and (d) diesel. D. H2 production for diesel of the (a) LaCr0.8Ru0.2O3 hollow fiber and (b) Pt–GDC. E. H2 production of the (a) LGO (LaCr0.8Ru0.2O3 hollow fiber), (b) MGO (LaCr0.8Ru0.2O3 hollow fiber), (c) HGO (LaCr0.8Ru0.2O3 hollow fiber), (d) HGO (LaCr0.8Ru0.2O3 grain), (e) LGO (Pt–GDC), (f) MGO (Pt–GDC), and (g) HGO (Pt–GDC). F. Recycling test of the LaCr0.8Ru0.2O3 hollow fiber using HGO. (all fuels = 0.012 ml·min−1, H2O/O2/C = 1.25:0.4:1, 1027 K, GHSV = 4000 h−1). G. SEM image and XRD patterns (inset) of the LaCr0.8Ru0.2O3 hollow fiber refreshed after HGO reforming.
Composition of (a) LGO, (b) MGO, and (c) HGO
| Total Aromatics (%) | Sulfur (ppm) | Nitrogen (ppm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reactive | Refractory | Cz | Alkyl-Cz | ||
| (a) | 21 | 4,133.5 | 3,566.5 | 1.4 | 83.6 |
| (b) | 25 | 4,741.4 | 5,858.6 | 3.1 | 94.9 |
| (c) | 32 | 6,500.0 | 10,500.0 | 4.3 | 307.7 |
Elemental analysis by CHNS after ATR of the (a) LGO (LaCr0.8Ru0.2O3 hollow fiber), (b) MGO (LaCr0.8Ru0.2O3 hollow fiber), (c) HGO (LaCr0.8Ru0.2O3 hollow fiber), (d) HGO (LaCr0.8Ru0.2O3 grain), (e) LGO (Pt–GDC), (f) MGO (Pt–GDC), and (g) HGO (Pt–GDC)
| Content (wt%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | |
| Carbon | 11.52 | 15.75 | 18.77 | 25.47 | 34.05 | 35.30 | 39.15 |
| Sulfur | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.21 | 0.40 | 0.78 | 0.99 |