| Literature DB >> 24103706 |
Paschalis Tossios1, Avgerinos Karatzopoulos2, Konstantinos Tsagakis3, Konstantinos Sapalidis4, Vasilios Grosomanidis5, Anna Kalogera6, Konstantinos Kouskouras6, Christophoros N Foroulis2, Kyriakos Anastasiadis2.
Abstract
For cardiothoracic surgeons prosthetic graft infection still represents a difficult diagnostic and treatment problem to manage. An aggressive surgical strategy involving removal and in situ replacement of all the prosthetic material combined with extensive removal of the surrounding mediastinal tissue remains technically challenging in any case. Mortality and morbidity rates following such a major and risky surgical procedure are high due to the nature of the aggressive surgical approach and multi-organ failure typically caused by sepsis. However, removal of the infected prosthetic graft in patients who had an operation to reconstruct the ascending aorta and/or the aortic arch is not always possible or necessary for selected patients according to current alternative treatment options. Rather than following the traditional surgical concept of aggressive graft replacement nowadays a more conservative surgical approach with in situ preservation and coverage of the prosthetic graft by vascular tissue flaps can result in a good outcome. In this article, we review the relevant literature on this specific topic, particularly in terms of graft-sparing surgery for infected ascending/arch prosthetic grafts with special emphasis on staged treatment and the use of omentum transposition.Entities:
Keywords: Aortic arch; Ascending aorta; In situ preservation; Irrigation; Omentum transposition; Prosthetic graft infection
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24103706 DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2013.09.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heart Lung Circ ISSN: 1443-9506 Impact factor: 2.975