Literature DB >> 24103499

Prospect theory in the health domain: a quantitative assessment.

Arthur E Attema1, Werner B F Brouwer, Olivier I'Haridon.   

Abstract

It is well-known that expected utility (EU) has empirical deficiencies. Cumulative prospect theory (CPT) has developed as an alternative with more descriptive validity. However, CPT's full function had not yet been quantified in the health domain. This paper is therefore the first to simultaneously measure utility of life duration, probability weighting, and loss aversion in this domain. We observe loss aversion and risk aversion for gains and losses, which for gains can be explained by probabilistic pessimism. Utility for gains is almost linear. For losses, we find less weighting of probability 1/2 and concave utility. This contrasts with the common finding of convex utility for monetary losses. However, CPT was proposed to explain choices among lotteries involving monetary outcomes. Life years are arguably very different from monetary outcomes and need not generate convex utility for losses. Moreover, utility of life duration reflects discounting, causing concave utility.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  B41; Cumulative prospect theory; D03; I10; Loss aversion; QALY model; Utility of life duration

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24103499     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  11 in total

1.  Predicting medical practices using various risk attitude measures.

Authors:  Sophie Massin; Antoine Nebout; Bruno Ventelou
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-08-31

2.  Preferences for Analgesic Treatments Are Influenced by Probability of the Occurrence of Adverse Effects and the Time to Reach Maximal Therapeutic Effects.

Authors:  Chia-Shu Lin; Shih-Yun Wu; Long-Ting Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  New findings from the time trade-off for income approach to elicit willingness to pay for a quality adjusted life year.

Authors:  Arthur E Attema; Marieke Krol; Job van Exel; Werner B F Brouwer
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-03-08

4.  Ambiguity preferences for health.

Authors:  Arthur E Attema; Han Bleichrodt; Olivier L'Haridon
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Nudging people with Type 2 diabetes towards better self-management through personalized risk communication: A pilot randomized controlled trial in primary care.

Authors:  Thomas Rouyard; Jose Leal; Richard Baskerville; Carmelo Velardo; Dario Salvi; Alastair Gray
Journal:  Endocrinol Diabetes Metab       Date:  2018-06-22

6.  QALYs without bias? Nonparametric correction of time trade-off and standard gamble weights based on prospect theory.

Authors:  Stefan A Lipman; Werner B F Brouwer; Arthur E Attema
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Rabin's paradox for health outcomes.

Authors:  Stefan A Lipman; Arthur E Attema
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Unbiased assessment of disease surveillance utilities: A prospect theory application.

Authors:  Arthur E Attema; Lisheng He; Alasdair J C Cook; Victor J Del Rio Vilas
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2019-05-01

9.  Multivariate risk preferences in the quality-adjusted life year model.

Authors:  Arthur E Attema; Jona J Frasch; Olivier L'Haridon
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Potential determinants of deductible uptake in health insurance: How to increase uptake in The Netherlands?

Authors:  K P M van Winssen; R C van Kleef; W P M M van de Ven
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.